Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Book review

  • Published:
Artificial Intelligence and Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Bench-Capon, T. 1989. Deep Models, Normative Reasoning and Legal Expert Systems. InProceedings of the Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 37–45, Vancouver, B.C.

  • Bench-Capon, T. (ed.) 1991.Knowledge-Based Systems and Legal Applications. Academic Press: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, R. & Obel, B. 1980. A Computer Simulation Test of the m-Form Hypotheses.Administrative Science Quarterly 25: 457–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clancey, W. 1985. Heuristic Classification.Artificial Intelligence 27: 289–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, A. 1987.An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Legal Reasoning. Bradford Books/MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenleaf, G., Mowbray, A. & Tyree, A. 1991. The Datalex Legal Workstation — Integrating Tools for Lawyers. InProceedings of the Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Oxford, England.

  • Mausch, M. & LaPotin, P. 1989. Beyond Garbage Cans: An AI Model of Organizational Choice.Administrative Science Quarterly 34: 38–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, L. T. 1990. Artificial Intelligence and Law: How to Get There from Here. InRatio Juris 3: 189–200. Also inWorkshop Notes from the Eighth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence: Adversarial Reasoning and Artificial Intelligence and Legal Reasoning, Boston: American Association for Artificial Intelligence.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, L. T. 1991. On the Role of Prototypes in Appellate Legal Argument. InProceedings of the Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Oxford, England.

  • Newell, A. 1982. The Knowledge Level.Artificial Intelligence 18: 87–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, M. & Waterman, D. 1985. Rule-Based Models of Legal Expertise. InComputing Power and Legal Reasoning, ed. C. Walters, 627–659. West Publishing Company: Minneapolis, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susskind, R. 1987.Expert Systems in Law: A Jurisprudential Inquiry. Clarendon Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susskind, R. E. 1989. The Latent Damage System: A Jurisprudential Analysis. InProceedings of the Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Vancouver, B.C.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Branting, L.K. Book review. Artif Intell Law 2, 233–238 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00871891

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00871891

Navigation