Skip to main content
Log in

A self-organized model for the control, planning and learning of nonlinear multi-dimensional systems using a sensory feedback

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new approach is presented to deal with the problem of modelling and simulating the control mechanisms underlying planned-arm-movements. We adopt a synergetic view in which we assume that the movement patterns are not explicitly programmed but rather are emergent properties of a dynamic system constrained by physical laws in space and time. The model automatically translates a high-level command specification into a complete movement trajectory. This is an inverse problem, since the dynamic variables controlling the current state of the system have to be calculated from movement outcomes such as the position of the arm endpoint. The proposed method is based on an optimization strategy: the dynamic system evolves towards a stable equilibrium position according to the minimization of a potential function. This system, which could well be described as a feedback control loop, obeys a set of non-linear differential equations. The gradient descent provides a solution to the problem which proves to be both numerically stable and computationally efficient. Moreover, the addition into the control loop of elements whose structure and parameters have a pertinent biological meaning allows for the synthesis of gestural signals whose global patterns keep the main invariants of human gestures. The model can be exploited to handle more complex gestures involving planning strategies of movement. Finally, the extension of the approach to the learning and control of non-linear biological systems is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. Luenberger,Optimization by Vector Space Methods, John Wiley, 1970.

  2. H. Haken,Advanced Synergetics, Springer Verlag, 1983.

  3. D. Bullock and S. Grossberg, “Neural dynamics of planned-arm movements: emergent invariants and speed accuracy properties during trajectory formation,” inNeural Networks and Natural Intelligence, S. Grossberg, MIT Press, 1988.

  4. S. Grossberg and M. Kuperstein,Neural Dynamics of Adaptive Sensory-Motor Control (expanded edition), Pergamon Press, 1989.

  5. J.Ch. Gille, P. Decaulne, and M. Pélegrin,Systèmes asservis non linéaires, Dunod (5e édition), 1988.

  6. P. Viviani and C. Terzuolo, “The organization of movement in handwriting and typing,” inLanguage production II, Butterworth Ed., 1983.

  7. P. Viviani and M. Cenzato, “Segmentation and coupling in complex movements,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, pp. 828–845.

  8. L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifshitz,Mechanics. A course of theoretical physics, Vol. 1, Pergamon Press, 1976.

  9. S. Gibet, “Gestural control of sound synthesis processes,” I.N.R.I.A. (Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique), Annual Report, 1990.

  10. L. Ljung, Söderström,Theory and practice of Recursive Identification, MIT Press, 1983.

  11. D.E. Rumelhart, G.E. Hinton, and R.J. Williams, “Learning internal representations by error propagation,” inParallel distributed processing, Vol. 1, edited by D.E. Rumelhart & J.L. McClelland, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 318–363, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Jordan, “Indeterminate motor skill learning problems,” inAttention and Performance XIII, edited by Jeannerod, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  13. J. Albus, “A New Approach to Manipulator Control: The Cerebellar Model Articulation Controller,” Transactions of ASME,Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, Vol. 97, pp. 220–227, September 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Elsey, “Neural Network mechanisms for generation and learning of motor programs,”IEEE Conf. on Neural Networks, Vol. II, pp. 584–587, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  15. V. Gullapalli, “A Stochastic Reinforcement Learning Algorithm for Learning Real-Valued Function,”Neural Networks, Vol. 3, pp. 671–692, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Kawato, K. Furukawa, and R. Suzuki, “Hierarchical Neural-Network for Control and Learning of Voluntary Movement,”Biol. Cybern., Vol. 57, pp. 169–185, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Kuperstein, “Adaptive Visual-Motor Coordination in Multijoint Robots Using Parallel Architecture,”Proceedings of the 1987 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1595–1601, Raleigh, March 1987.

  18. W.T. Miller, “Sensor-based Control of Manipulation Robots Using a General Learning Algorithm,”IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, Vol. RA-3, pp. 157–165, April 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. Railbert and J. Craig, “Hybrid position/force control of manipulators,”Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, 102, 126–133, June 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  20. H. Ritter, T. Martinetz, and K. Schulten, “Topology-conserving Maps for Learning Visuomotor Coordination,”Neural Networks, Vol. 2, pp. 159–168, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  21. B. Horne, M. Jamshidi, and N. Vadiee, “Neural Networks in Robotics: A Survey,”Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, Vol. 3, pp. 51–66, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gibet, S., Marteau, PF. A self-organized model for the control, planning and learning of nonlinear multi-dimensional systems using a sensory feedback. Appl Intell 4, 337–349 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872473

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872473

Keywords

Navigation