Skip to main content
Log in

mwKAT: A meta-tool-generated knowledge acquisition tool for multimedia workstations development

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

mwKAT is an interactive knowledge acquisition tool for acquiring domain knowledge about multimedia components. It constructs knowledge bases for a consulting system that produces the design specification for a multimedia workstation according to the user requirements.mwKAT is generated from and executed inGAS, a primitives-based generic knowledge acquisition meta-tool. It contains three acquisition primitives, namely, parameter proposing, constraint proposing, and fix proposing to construct an intermediate knowledge base represented by a dependency model. These primitives identify necessary domain knowledge and guide users to propose significant components, constraints, and fix methods into the dependency model.mwKAT also invokes knowledge verification and validation primitives to verify the completeness, consistency, compilability, and correctness of the intermediate knowledge base.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J.S. Bennett, “ROGET: A knowledge-based system for acquiring the conceptual structure of a diagnostic expert system,”Journal of Automated Reasoning, vol. 1, pp. 49–74, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P.R. Bono, “A survey of graphics standards and their role in information interchange,”IEEE Computer, pp. 63–75, October 1985.

  3. J.H. Boose, “Personal construct theory and the transfer of human expertise,” inProc. of AAAI-84, Austin, Texas, 1984.

  4. J.H. Boose, “Expertise transfer and complex problems: Using AQUINAS as a knowledge acquisition workbench for expert systems,”International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 3–28, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J.H. Boose and B.R. Gaines,Knowledge Acquisition Tools for Expert Systems, CA: Academic Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.H. Boose, “A survey of knowledge acquisition techniques and tools,”International Journal of Knowledge Acquisition, vol. 1, pp. 3–37, March 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  7. B.G. Buchanan,et al., “Constructing an expert system,” inBuilding Expert Systems, edited by F. Hayes Roth, D.A. Waterman, and D.B. Lenat, Addison Wesley, MA, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  8. T. Bylander and B. Chandrasekaran, “Generic tasks in knowledge-based reasoning: The ‘right’ level of abstraction for knowledge acquisition,”International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, vol. 26, pp. 231–244, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.G. Carbonell, “Introduction: Paradigms for machine learning,”Artificial Intelligence, vol. 40, September 1989.

  10. B. Chandrasekaran, “Generic tasks in knowledge-based reasoning: high-level building blocks for expert system design,”IEEE Expert, vol. 1, pp. 23–30, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S.K. Chang, “Visual languages and iconic systems,” inWorkshop on Visual Languages, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, R.O.C, pp. 1–23, June 1987.

  12. C.C. Chien and C.S. Ho, “A primitives-based approach to knowledge acquisition,” inProc. of IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, October, 1992.

  13. W. Clancey, “Heuristic classification,”Artificial Intelligence, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 289–350, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Eriksson and M. Musen, “Metatools for knowledge acquisition,”IEEE Software, pp. 23–29, May 1993.

  15. L. Eshelman, “MOLE: A knowledge-acquisition tool for cover-and-differentiate systems,” inAutomating Knowledge Acquisition for Expert Systems, edited by S. Marcus, Kluwer Academic Publishers, MA, pp. 37–80, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. Gibbs, D. Tsiechritzis, A. Fitas, D. Konstantas, and Y. Yeorgaroudakis, “Muse: a multimedia filing system,”IEEE Software, pp. 4–15, March 1987.

  17. J. Joaquin, G.L. Aceves, and A.A. Poggio, “Computer-based multimedia communications,”IEEE Computer, pp. 10–11, October 1985.

  18. G. Kahn, S. Nowlan, and J. McDermott, “Strategies for knowledge acquisition,”IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. PAMI-7, no. 5, pp. 511–522, September 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  19. G. Klinker, “KNACK: Sample-driven knowledge acquisition for reporting systems,” inAutomating Knowledge Acquisition for Expert Systems, edited by S. Marcus, Kluwer Academic Publishers, MA, pp. 125–174, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  20. C.Y. Lin, C.C. Chien, and C.S. Ho, “A generic shell-specialized knowledge acquisition tool for developing network management software,”Proc. of 6th International Conference of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, CA, June 1993.

  21. Z. Ma, “New tools to support ODA and ODIF,”Computer Communications, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 15–20, February 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  22. C. MacDonald, “Machine learning: A survey of current techniques,”Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 243–280, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  23. S. Marcus,Automating Knowledge Acquisition for Expert Systems, MA: Kluwer Academic, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  24. S. Marcus and J. McDermott, “SALT: A knowledge acquisition language for propose-and-revise systems,”Artificial Intelligence, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1–37, May 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  25. D. Marqueset al., “Easy programming: empowering people to build their own application,”IEEE Expert, pp. 16–29, June 1992.

  26. K.L. McGraw and K. Harbison-Briggs,Knowledge Acquisition Principles and Guidelines, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc., 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  27. R.S. Mitchalski, J.G. Carbonell, and T.M. Mitchell,Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach, Palo Alto, CA: Tioga Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  28. D. Offutt, “SIZZLE: A knowledge-acquisition tool specialized for the sizing task,” inAutomating Knowledge Acquisition for Expert Systems, edited by S. Marcus, Kluwer Academic Publishers, MA, pp. 37–80, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  29. A.R. Puerta, J.W. Wgar, A.W. Tu, and M.A. Musen, “A multiple-method knowledge-acquisition shell for the automatic generation of knowledge-acquisition tools,”Knowledge Acquisition, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 171–196, June 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  30. J.T. Runkel and W.P. Birmingham, “Knowledge acquisition in the small: building knowledge-acquisition tools from pieces,”Knowledge Acquisition, vol. 5, pp. 221–243, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  31. J.S. Sventek, “An architecture supporting multimedia integration,” inIEEE Computer Society Office Automation Symposium, pp. 45–56, April 1987.

  32. L. Steels, “Components of expertise,”AI Magazine, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 28–49, Summer 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  33. B.J. Wielinga, A.T. Schreiber, and J.A. Breuker,, “KADS: A modeling approach to knowledge engineering,”Knowledge Acquisition, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 5–53, March 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  34. D. Woelk, W. Luther, and W. Kim, “Multimedia applications and database requirements,” inIEEE Computer Society Office Automation Symposium, pp. 180–189, April 1987.

  35. CCITT Recommendations X series, T series, Q series and I series.

  36. NEXPERT OBJECT: User guide and Reference manual, Neuron data, Inc., Palo Alto, CA, January 1991.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chien, CC., Ho, CS. & Lee, HM. mwKAT: A meta-tool-generated knowledge acquisition tool for multimedia workstations development. Appl Intell 5, 51–72 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872783

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872783

Keywords

Navigation