Skip to main content
Log in

Hownot to demarcate cognitive science and folk psychology: A response to Pickering and Chater

  • Critical Exchange
  • Published:
Minds and Machines Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pickering and Chater (P&C) maintain that folk psychology and cognitive science should neither compete nor cooperate. Each is an “independent enterprise,” with a distinct subject matter and characteristic modes of explanation. P&C's case depends upon their characterizations of cognitive science and folk psychology. We question the basis for their characterizations, challenge both the coherence and the individual adequacy of their contrasts between the two, and show that they waver in their views about the scope of each. We conclude that P&C do not so muchdiscover ascreate the gap they find between folk psychology and cognitive science. It is an artifact of their implausible and unmotivated attempt to demarcate the two areas, and of the excessively narrow accounts they give of each.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Bechtel, W. and R.C. Richardson (1993),Discovering Complexity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braine, M.D.S. (1978), ‘On the Relation between the Natural Logic of Reasoning and Standard Logic,’Psychological Review 85: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, B.G. (1985), ‘Steps Toward Mechanizing Discovery’, in Schaffner (1985), 94–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, B.G., G.L. Sutherland, and E.A. Feigenbaum (1969), ‘Heuristic DENDRAL: A Program for Generating Explanatory Processes in Organic Chemistry,’ in B. Meltzer and D. Michie, eds.,Machine Intelligence 4. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, P.W. and K.J. Holyoak (1985), ‘Pragmatic Reasoning Schemas,’Cognitive Psychology 17: 391–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, P.W. and K.J. Holyoak (1989), ‘On the Natural Selection of Reasoning Theories,’Cognition 33: 285–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, P.W. and R.E. Nisbett (1993), ‘Pragmatic Constraints on Causal Deduction,’ in Nisbett (1993), 207–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, P.W., K.J. Holyoak, R.E. Nisbett, and L.M. Oliver (1986), ‘Pragmatic versus Syntactic Approaches to Training Deductive Reasoning,’Cognitive Psychology 18: 293–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M.T.H., P. Feltovic, and R. Glaser (1981), ‘Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices’,Cognitive Science 5: 121–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M.T.H., R. Glaser, and M.J. Farr (1988),The Nature of Expertise. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feigenbaum, E.A. (1989), ‘What Hath Simon Wrought?’ in D. Klahr and K. Kotovsky, eds.,Complex Information Processing, Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 165–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feigenbaum E.A. and J. Feldman (1963),Computers and Thought, New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fong, G.T., D.H. Krantz, and R.E. Nisbett (1993), ‘The Effects of Statistical Training on Thinking about Everyday Problems,’Cognitive Psychology 18: 253–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G. (1991), ‘How to Make Cognitive Illusions Disappear: Beyond ‘Heuristics and Biases’,’European Review of Social Psychology 2: 83–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G. and K. Hug (1992), ‘Domain-specific Reasoning: Social Contracts, Cheating and Perspective Change’,Cognition 43: 127–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J.H., K.J. Holyoak, R.E. Nisbett, and P.R. Thagard (1986),Induction: Process of Inference, Learning and Discovery. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1975), ‘Models of Deduction,’ in R.J. Falmagne, ed.,Reasoning: Representation and Process. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky (1982), ‘On the Study of Statistical Intuitions,’Cognition 11: 237–251; reprinted in D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, and A. Tversky, eds.,Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 493–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langley, P., H.A. Simon, G.L. Bradshaw, and J.M. Zytkow (1987),Scientific Discovery. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, J.H., J. McDermott, D. Simon, and H.A. Simon (1980), ‘Expert and Novice Performance in Solving Physics Problems,’Science 208: 1335–1342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manktelow, K.I. and J.B.T. Evans (1979), ‘Facilitation of Reasoning by Realism: Effect or Noneffect?’British Journal of Psychology 70: 477–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, D. and J. Doyle (1980), ‘Non-monotonic Logic I,’Artificial Intelligence 13: 41–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A., J.C. Shaw, and H.A. Simon (1957), ‘Empirical Explorations with the Logic Theory Machine,’Proceedings of the Western Joint Computer Conference 15: 218–239; reprinted in Feigenbaum and Feldman (1963): 109–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A., J.C. Shaw, and H.A. Simon (1958), ‘Chess Playing Programs and the Problem of Complexity,’IBM Journal of Research and Development 2: 320–335; reprinted in Feigenbaum and Feldman (1963): 39–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A., J.C. Shaw, and H.A. Simon (1972),Human Problem Solving, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R.E. (1993),Rules for Reasoning. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R.E. and L. Ross (1980),Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R.E., D.H. Krantz, D. Jepson, and Z. Kunda (1993), ‘The Use of Statistical Heuristics in Everyday Reasoning’,Psychological Review 90: 339–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osherson, D. (1975), ‘Logic and Models of Logical Thinking’, in R.J. Falmagne, ed.,Reasoning: Representation and Process. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pylyshyn, Z. (1984),Computation and Cognition: Toward a Foundation for Cognitive Science. Cambridge: MIT Press/Bradford Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, S.S. and P. Ruth (1982), ‘Wason's Selection Task: Verification, Falsification and Matching,’British Journal of Psychology 73: 395–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, R. (1980), ‘A Logic for Default Reasoning,’Artifical Intelligence 13: 81–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rips, L. (1983), ‘Cognitive Processes in Propositional Reasoning,’Psychological Review 90: 38–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuel, A.L. (1959), ‘Some Studies in Machine Learning Using the Game of Checkers,’IBM Journal of Research and Development 2: 320–335; reprinted in Feigenbaum and Feldman (1963): 71–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffner, K.F., ed. (1985),Logic of Discovery and Diagnosis in Medicine. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, Claude E. and W. Weaver (1949).The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. (1969),The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. (1979),Models of Thought. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. (1985), ‘Artificial-Intelligence Approaches to Problem Solving and Clinical Diagnosis,’ in Schaffner (1985), 72–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. and K.J. Gilmartin (1973), ‘A Simulation for Chess Positions,’Cognitive Psychology 5: 29–46; reprinted in Simon (1979): 373–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. and M. Barenfield (1969), ‘Information Processing Analysis of Perceptual Processes in Problem Solving,’Psychological Review 76: 473–483; reprinted in Simon (1979): 363–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. and W.G. Chase (1973a), ‘Perception in Chess,’Cognitive Psychology 4: 55–81 reprinted in Simon (1979); 386–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. and W.G. Chase (1973b), ‘The Mind's Eye in Chess,’ in W.G. Chase, ed.,Visual Information Processing (Academic Press), 215–281; reprinted in Simon (1979): 404–427.

  • Suppe, F. (1985), ‘Artificial-Intelligence and Computer Approaches to Clinical Medical Diagnosis; Comments on Simon and Pople,’ in Schaffner (1985), 232–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wason, P. (1966), ‘Reasoning,’ in B.M. Foss, ed.,New Horizons in Psychology. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wason, P. and P.N. Johnson-Laird (1972),Psychology of Reasoning: Structure and Content. London: Batsford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morris, W.E., Richardson, R.C. Hownot to demarcate cognitive science and folk psychology: A response to Pickering and Chater. Mind Mach 5, 339–355 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00974749

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00974749

Key words

Navigation