Skip to main content
Log in

Book reviews

  • Published:
Minds and Machines Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Bruner, Jerome (1986),Actual Minds, Possible Worlds, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burke, Kenneth (1969),A Grammar of Motives, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chafe, Wallace (ed.) (1980),The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production, Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Greimas, A.-J., and Courtès, J. (1976), ‘The Cognitive Dimension of Narrative Discourse,’New Literary History 7: 433–447.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Segal, Erwin M.; Duchan, Judith F.; and Scott, Paula J. (1991), ‘The Role of Interclausal Connectives in Narrative Structuring: Evidence from Adults' Interpretations of Simple Stories,’Discourse Processes 14: 27–54.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vygotsky, Lev S. (1978)Mind in Society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Davidson, Donald (1967), ‘Truth and Meaning’,Synthese 17: pp 304–323; reprinted in D. Davidson,Truth and Interpretation (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Davidson, Donald (1970), ‘Mental Events’, in L. Foster and J. Swanson (eds.),Experience and Theory (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press), pp. 79–101.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Davidson, Donald (1973), ‘Radical Interpretation’,Dialectica 27: 313–328; reprinted in D. Davidson,Truth and Interpretation (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Davidson, Donald (1984), ‘Belief and the Basis of Meaning’, in D. Davidson.Truth and Interpretation (Oxford: Clarendon Press), pp. 141–154.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Grandy, Richard (1973), ‘Reference, Meaning, and Belief’,Journal of Philosophy 70: 439–452.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schiffer, Stephen (1987),Remnants of Meaning (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stich, Stephen P. (1983),From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Dretske, Fred (1985), ‘Machines and the Mental’,Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 59, 23–33.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Matson, Wallace (1976),Sentience, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Robinson, J. Alan (1965), ‘A Machine Oriented Logic Based on the Resolution Principle’,Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery 12, pp. 23–41.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Winston, Patrick H. (1984),Artificial Intelligence, 2nd ed. (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ballard, Dana H. and Brown, Christopher M. (1982),Computer Vision (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Dreyfus Hubert (1972),What Computers Can't Do: The Limits of Artificial Intelligence (New York: Harper & Row).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fodor, Jerry (1978), ‘Tom Swift and His Procedural Grandmother’,Cognition 6, 229–247.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Johnson-Laird, Philip (1977), ‘Procedural Semantics’,Cognition 5, 189–214.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wilks, Yorick (1982), ‘Some Thoughts on Procedural Semantics’, in W.G. Lehnert & M.H. Ringle (eds.),Strategies for Natural Language Processing (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum), 492–516.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Winograd, Terry (1972),Understanding Natural Language (New York: Academic Press).

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Dretske, Fred (1981),Knowledge and the Flow of Information, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fodor, Jerry A. (1975),The Language of Thought, New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fodor, Jerry A. (1981),RePresentations: Philosophical Essays on the Foundations of Cognitive Science, Brighton, Eng.: Harvester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fodor, Jerry A. (1987),Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hintikka, Jaakko (1981), ‘Semantics: A Revolt against Frege’, in G. Fløistad (ed.),Contemporary Philosophy: A New Survey, Vol. 1, Philosophy of Language, Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 57–82.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Irigaray, Luce (1989), ‘Is the Subject of Science Sexed?’, trans. by C. M. Bové, in N. Tuana (ed.),Feminism and Science, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 58–68.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rorty, Richard (1979),Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stampe, Dennis (1975), ‘Show and Tell’, in B. Freed, A. Marras, and P. Maynard (eds.),Forms of Representation, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 221–245.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Burge, Tyler (1979), ‘Individualism and the Mental’,Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4, 73–121.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fodor, Jerry A. (1968),Psychological Explanation, New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fodor, Jerry A. (1980), ‘Methodological Solipsism Considered as a Research Strategy in Cognitive Science’,Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, 63–109.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fodor, Jerry A. (1987),Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fodor, Jerry A. (1990),Theory of Content and Other Essays, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fodor, Jerry A. and McLaughlin, Brian (1990), ‘Connectionism and the Problem of Systematicity: Why Smolensky's Solution Doesn't Work’,Cognition 35, 183–204.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Marras, Ausonio (1987), ‘The Weak and the Strong RTM: Stich's Interpretation of Fodor’,Dialogue 26, 249–355.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Putnam, Hilary (1975), ‘The Meaning of “Meaning”’, inMind, Language, and Reality, Vol. 2, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 215–271.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stich, Stephen (1983),From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Segal, E.M., Williams, M., Cole, D.J. et al. Book reviews. Mind Mach 3, 335–375 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00976286

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00976286