Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation: An assessment

  • Published:
Machine Translation

Abstract

The primary aim of this contribution is to provide an editorial introduction to this Special Issue ofMachine Translation dedicated to Evaluation. The intention is to describe the rationale for the Issue, outline the various contributions of the papers in this issue, and try to situate them in a wider context. As part of providing this wider context, we give an overview and assessment of the main current approaches to Evaluation of Natural Language Processing, and especially Machine Translation systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • L. Balkan, M. Jaäschke, L. Humphreys, S. Meijer and A. Way (1991) Declarative Evaluation of an MT System: Practical Experiences,Applied Computer Translation, 1(3), 49–59

    Google Scholar 

  • M. King and K. Falkedal (1990) Using Test Suites in Evaluation of Machine Translation Systems,13th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Helsinki, 211–216

  • Dan Flickinger, John Nerbonne, Ivan Sag and Tom Wasow (1987) Toward Evaluation of NLP Systems,Ms delivered at Session of 25th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

  • Giovanni Guida and Giancarlo Mauri (1986) Evaluation of Natural Language Processing Systems: Issues and Approaches,Proceedings of the IEEE, 74 (7), 1026–1035.

    Google Scholar 

  • John A. Hawkins (1985)A Comparative Typology of English and German: Unifying the Contrasts, Croom Helm, London

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Humphreys, M. Jaäschke, A. Way, L. Balkan, and S. Meijer (1991) Operational Evaluation of MT,Working Papers in Language Processing 22, Dept. of Language and Linguistics, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margaret King (1989)A Practical Guide to the Evaluation of Machine Translation Systems, ms. ISSCO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • John Lehrberger and Laurent Bourbeau (1987)Machine Translation: Linguistic Characteristics of MT Systems and General Methodology of Evaluation, Amsterdam, John Benjamin

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Nagao, J. Tsujii, and J. Nakamura (1988). The Japanese Government Project for Machine Translation. In: J. Slocum (ed.).Machine Translation Systems, Cambridge: University Press Cambridge 141–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Martha Palmer and Tim Finin (1990) Workshop on the Evaluation of Natural Language Processing Systems,Computational Linguistics, 16 (3), 175–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • John R. Pierce and John B. Carroll (1966)Language and Machines - Computers in Translation and Linguistics (ALPAC Report), Washington D.C.

  • G. van Slype (1982) Conception d'une méthodologie générale d' évaluation de la traduction automatique,Multilingua, 1(4), 221–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Muriel Vasconcellos (1989), Long-term Data for an MT Policy,Literary and Linguistic Computing, 4(3), 203–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard Vauquois and Christian Boitet (1988) Automated Translation at Grenoble University. In: J. Slocum (ed.)Machine Translation Systems, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 85–110

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Way (1991), A Practical Developer-Oriented Evaluation of Two MT Systems. Working Papers in Language Processing, 26, Department of Language and Linguistics, University of Essex, Colchester, UK

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arnold, D., Sadler, L. & Humprheys, R.L. Evaluation: An assessment. Mach Translat 8, 1–24 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00981238

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00981238

Keywords

Navigation