Skip to main content
Log in

On the danger of half-truths

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Criteria of approximate scientific success are defined within a formal paradigm of empirical inquiry. One consequence of aiming for less than perfect truth is examined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. Blum and M. Blum. Toward a mathematical theory of inductive inference.Information and Control,28:125–155, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. C. Chang and H. J. Keisler.Model Theory (2nd Edition). North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Case and C. Smith. Comparison of identification criteria for machine inductive inference.Theoretical Computer Science,25:193–220, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  4. John Earman and Clark Glymour. Relativity and eclipses: The British eclipse expeditions of 1919 and their predecessors.Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences,11:49–85, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. Enderton.A Mathematical Introduction to Logic. Academic Press, New York, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Paul K. Feyerabend.Against Method NLB, London, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Fulk and S. Jain. Approximate inference and scientific method.Information and Computation, in press.

  8. Clark Glymour and Kevin Kelly. On convergence to the truth and nothing but the truth.Philosophy of Science,56, 1989.

  9. E. M. Gold. Limiting recursion.Journal of Symbolic Logic,30(1):27–48, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. Gaifman, D. Osherson, and S. Weinstein. A reason for theoretical terms.Erkenntnis,32:149–159, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kevin Kelly and Clark Glymour. Inductive inference from theory laden data.Journal of Philosophical Logic, 21:391–444, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kevin Kelly and Clark Glymour. Theory discovery from data with mixed quantifiers.Journal of Philosophical Logic,19:1–33, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kevin Kelly and Cory Juhl. A characterization of almost stable identification over arbitrary inductive settings.Manuscript, 1992.

  14. Thomas S. Kuhn.The Copernican Revolution: planetary astronomy in the development of Western thought. Random House, New York, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Thomas S. Kuhn.The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  16. I. Lakatos. Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In J. Worral and G. Currie, editors,The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, pages 8–101. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge MA, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. Osherson, M. Stob, and S. Weinstein. Mechanical learners pay a price for bayesianism.Journal of Symbolic Logic,53(4):1245–1251, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  18. D. Osherson, M. Stob, and S. Weinstein. A mechanical method of successful scientific inquiry. In M. Fulk and J. Case, editors,Proceedings of the Third Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, pages 187–291. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., 1990.

  19. D. Osherson, M. Stob, and S. Weinstein. A universal inductive inference machine.Journal of Symbolic Logic,56(2):661–672, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  20. D. Osherson, M. Stob, and S. Weinstein. A universal method of scientific inquiry.Machine Learning,9:261–271, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. Osherson, M. Stob, and S. Weinstein. Logic and learning. In S. Hanson, G. Drastal, and R. Rivest, editors,Computational Learning Theory and Natural Learning Systems. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge MA, In press.

  22. D. Osherson and S. Weinstein. Criteria of language learning.Information and Control,52:123–138, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  23. D. Osherson and S. Weinstein. Identification in the limit of first-order structures.Journal of Philosophical Logic,15:55–81, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  24. D. Osherson and S. Weinstein. Identifiable collections of countable structures.Philosophy of Science,18:1–42, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  25. D. Osherson and S. Weinstein. Paradigms of truth-detection.Journal of Philosophical Logic,18:1–42, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  26. D. Osherson and S. Weinstein. Relevant consequence and empirical.Journal of Philosophical Logic,22:437–448, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  27. C. S. Peirce.Collected Papers of C. S. Peirce. (A. W. Burks, Editor) Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  28. K. Popper.The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Hutchinson, London, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hilary Putnam. Trial and error predicates and a solution to a problem of mostowski.Journal of Symbolic Logic,30(1):49–57, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  30. H. Putnam. Probability and confirmation. InMathematics, Matter, and Method. Cambridge University Press, 1975.

  31. H. Rogers.Theory of Recursive Function and Effective Computability. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  32. J. Royer. Inductive inference of approximations.Information and Control,70:156–178, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  33. G. Schurz and P. Weingartner. Verisimilitude defined by relevant consequenceelements. A new reconstruction of Popper's idea. In T. A. Kuipers, editor, What is Closer-to-the-Truth? Rodopi, Amsterdam, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  34. John Watkins.Science and Scepticism. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Osherson, D., Weinstein, S. On the danger of half-truths. J Philos Logic 24, 85–115 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01052732

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01052732

Keywords

Navigation