Skip to main content
Log in

The relative consistency of system RRC* and some of its extensions

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a relative consistency proof for second order systemRRC* and for certain important extensions of this system. The proof proceeds as follows: we prove first the equiconsistency of the strongest of such extensions (viz., systemH RRC*+(∃/CP**)) with second order systemT *λ . Now, N. Cocchiarella has shown thatT *λ is relatively consistent to systemT*+Ext; clearly, it follows thatH RRC*+(∃/CP**) is relatively consistent toT*+E xt. As an immediate consequence, the relative consistency ofRRC* and the other extensions also follows, being all of them subsystems ofH RRC*+(∃/CP**).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. B. Cocchiarella,Frege's double correlation thesis and Quine's set theories NF and ML Journal of Philosophical Logic 14 (1985), pp. 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  2. N. B. Cocchiarella,Logical Investigations of Predication Theory and the Problem of Universals Bibliopolis Press, Naples 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. B. Cocchiarella,Conceptualism, ramified logic and normalized predicates Topoi 5 (1986), pp. 75–87.

    Google Scholar 

  4. N. B. Cocchiarella,Quine on classes, set theory and higher-order logic: A critique, Synthese, 1992. Forthcoming.

  5. M. A. Freund, Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University at Bloomington, 1989.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I am grateful to the referee for some modifications suggested to an earlier draft of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Freund, M.A. The relative consistency of system RRC* and some of its extensions. Stud Logica 53, 351–360 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01057932

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01057932

Keywords

Navigation