Abstract
The aim of this paper is to introduce a logically grounded approach to action semantics and action interpretation. The main idea is to present the context of action as a set of questions demanding an action to answer. I introduce (a) a basic procedure of action interpretation, which is a reformulation of Hilpinen's semantical procedure for imperatives; (b) a procedure of what-interpretation; (c) a procedure of why-interpretation. The conditions of mutual reducibility of interpretation procedures are explicated. The paper concludes by putting forth the problem of interpretive bounds of moral responsibility.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blum, Lawrence: 1991, ‘Moral Perception and Particularity’,Ethics 101, 701–25.
Coyne, Margaret U.: 1984, ‘Role and Rational Action’,Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 14, 259–75.
Deutsch, Harry: 1990, ‘Real Possibility’,Noûs 24, 751–55.
Follesdal, Dagfinn: 1981, ‘Understanding and Ratlonality’ inMeaning and Understanding, in H. Parret and J. Bouveresse (eds.),The Semantics of Imperatives and Deontic Logic, University of Turku, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin (Preprint).
Hilpinen, Risto: 1985,The Semantics of Imperatives and Deontic Logic, University of Turku (Preprint).
MacIntyre, Alasdair: 1981,After Virtue, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.
MacIntyre, Alasdair: 1986, ‘The Intelligibility of Action’, in J. Margoliset al. (eds.),Rationality, Relativism and Human Sciences, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 63–80.
Omelyanchik, Valentin: 1991,Possibility, Structure, Action: An Introduction to Modal Realism, Naukova Dumka, Kiev.
Rorty, Amelie: 1986, ‘How to Interpret Actions’, in J. Margoliset al. (eds.),Rationality, Relativism and the Human Sciences, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 81–90.
Searle, J. R.: 1990, ‘Collective Intentions and Actions’, in P. R. Cohenet al. (eds.),Intentions in Communication, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 401–415.
Tiles, J. E.: 1982, ‘Ability, Possibility and Responsibility’, in G. Floistad (ed.),Contemporary Philosophy, A New Survey,3, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, pp. 73–105.
Tuomela, Raimo: 1982, ‘Explanation of Action’, in G. Floistad (ed.),Contemporary Philosophy: A New Survey,3, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, pp. 15–43.
Wright, George H.: 1971,Explanation and Understanding, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vasylchenko, A. Interpreting action as an answer. Synthese 100, 39–48 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01063920
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01063920