Skip to main content
Log in

Adaptive systems: A solution to usability problems

  • Published:
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Improving the usability of computer systems is perhaps the most important goal of human-computer interaction research. Current approaches to usability engineering tend to focus on simply improving the interface. An alternative is to build intelligence into the system. However, in order to do this a more comprehensive analysis is required and systems must be designed so that they can be made adaptive. This paper examines the implications for systems analysis, design and usability specification if adaptive systems are to be a realistic solution to usability problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnard, P.: 1987, ‘Interacting Cognitive Subsystems’. In: J. M. Carroll (ed.): Interfacing Thought: Cognitive Aspects of Human-Computer Interaction. MIT Press.

  • Benyon, D. R.: 1990,Information and Data Modelling, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benyon, D. R.: 1992, ‘The Role of Task Analysis in Systems Design’.Interacting with Computers,4(1), 102–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benyon, D. R.: 1993, ‘Accommodating Individual Differences through an Adaptive User Interface’. In: M. Schneider-Hufschmidt, T. Kühme, and U. Malinowski (eds.):Adaptive User Interfaces — Results and Prospects. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benyon D. R. and D. M. Murray: 1993, ‘Applying User Modelling to Human-Computer Interaction Design’.Artificial Intelligence Review 6, 43–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, D. P., P. A. Totterdell, and M. A. Norman: 1990,Adaptive User Interfaces. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catterall, B. J., B. C. Taylor, and M. D. Galer: 1991, ‘The HUFIT Planning, Analysis and Specification Toolset: Human Factors as a Normal Part of the I.T. Product Design Processing’. In: J. Karat (ed.):Taking Software Design Seriously. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. and M. Jones: 1989, ‘Incorporating User Models into Expert Systems for Educational Diagnosis’. In: A. Kobsa and W. Wahlster (eds.):User Models in Dialog Systems. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMarco, T.: 1979,Structured Analysis, System Specification. Prentice-Hall.

  • Dennett, D.: 1989,The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaper, D. (ed.): 1989,Task Analysis for Human-Computer Interaction. Chichester, UK: Ellis Horwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, R. F.: 1985,Individual Differences in Cognition Volume 2. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, R. F. and R. R. Schmeck: 1983,Individual Differences in Cognition Volume 1. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds, E. A.: 1987, ‘Adaptation, Response and Knowledge’.Knowledge-Based Systems 1(1), editorial.

  • Egan, D. E.: 1988, ‘Individual Differences in Human-Computer Interaction’. In: M. Helander (ed.):Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction. Elsevier-Science, 1988.

  • Greenberg, S. and I. H. Witten: 1985, ‘Adaptive Personalized Interfaces — A Question of Viability’.Behaviour and Information Technology 4(1).

  • Greenberg, S., I. Darragh, D. Maulsby, and I. H. Witten: 1991, ‘Predictive Interfaces. What Will They Think of Next?’. Presented atCHI '91 (unpublished).

  • Jennings, F. and D, R. Benyon: (in press) ‘Database Systems. Different Interfaces for Different Users’. Available as Computing Department Report. Open University.

  • Jennings, F., D. R. Benyon, and D. M. Murray: 1991, ‘Adapting Systems to Individual Differences in Cognitive Style’.Acta Psychologica 78 (1–3), 243–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobsa, A. and W. Wahlster: 1989,User Models in Dialog Systems. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macaulay, L. A., C. J. H. Fowler, M. A. R. Kirby, and A. F. T. Hutt: 1990, ‘USTM: A New Approach to Requirements Specification’.Interacting with Computers 2 (1), 92–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, M. V.: 1986, ‘Adaptive Command Prompting in an On-Line Documentation System’.International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 25, 33–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morik, K.: 1989, ‘User Models and Conversational Settings: Modelling the User's Wants’. In: A. Kobsa, and W. Wahlster (eds.):User Models in Dialog Systems. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pylyshyn, Z. W.: 1984,Computation and Cognition. Cambridge, Ma.: MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackel, B.: 1990, ‘Human Factors and Usability’. In: J. Preece and L. Keller (eds.):Human-Computer Interaction. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spark Jones, K.: 1988, ‘Realism about User Modelling’. In: A. Kobsa and W. Wahlster (eds.):User Models in Dialog Systems. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J.: 1985,Human Abilities. An Information Processing Approach. New York: Freeman and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thimbleby, H.: 1990,User Interface Design. Wokingham: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteside, J., J. Bennett, and K. Holtzblatt: 1988, ‘Usability Engineering: Our Experience and Evolution’. In: M. Helander (ed.): Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction. Elsevier-Science.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Benyon, D. Adaptive systems: A solution to usability problems. User Model User-Adap Inter 3, 65–87 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01099425

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01099425

Key words

Navigation