Skip to main content
Log in

Rejection rules in theM/G/1 queue

  • Published:
Queueing Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider aM/G/1 queue modified such that an arriving customer may be totally or partially rejected depending on a r.v. (the barricade) describing his impatience and on the state of the system. Three main variants of this scheme are studied. The steady-state distribution is expressed in terms of Volterra equations and the relation to storage processes, dams and queues with state-dependent Poisson arrival rate is discussed. For exponential service times, we further find the busy period Laplace transform in the case of a deterministic barricade, whereas for exponential barricade it is shown by a coupling argument that the busy period can be identified with a first passage time in an associated birth-death process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L.G. Afaneseva, Existence of a limit distribution in queueing systems with bounded sojourn time, Th. Prob. Appl. 10 (1965) 515–522.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Asmussen,Applied Probability and Queues (Wiley, Chichester New York, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Asmussen and D. Perry, On cycle maxima, first passage problems and extreme value theory for queues, Stoch. Models 8 (1992) 421–458.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Asmussen and M. Bladt, Phase-type distributions and risk processes with premiums dependent on the current reserve, to appear in Scand. Act. J.

  5. C.T.H. Baker,The Numerical Solution of Integral Equations (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. Bacelli and A.M. Makowski, Dynamic, transient and stationary behavior of the M/G/1 queue via martingales, Ann. Prob. 17 (1989) 1691–1699.

    Google Scholar 

  7. P.P. Bhattacharya and A. Eprhremides, Stochastic monotonicity of multiserver queues with impatient customers, J. Appl. Prob. 28 (1991) 673–682.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P.P. Bhattacharya and A. Eprhemides, Optimal scheduling under strict deadlines, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 34 (1989) 721–728.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Browne and K. Sigman, Work-modulated queues with applications to storage processes, J. Appl. Prob. 29 (1992) 699–712.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.W. Cohen, Single server queue with restricted accessibility, J. Eng. Math. 3 (1969) 265–285.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J.W. Cohen,The Single Server Queue, revised ed. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  12. D.J. Daley, Single server queueing system with uniformly limited queuing time, J. Aust. Math. Soc. 4 (1964) 489–505.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gavish and P.J. Schweitzer, The Markovian queue with bounded waiting time, Man. Sci. 23 (1977) 1349–1357.

    Google Scholar 

  14. B.V. Gnedenko and I.N. Kovalenko,Introduction to Queueing Theory, 2nd Ed. (Birkhäuser, Basel, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  15. J.M. Harrison and S.I. Resnick, The stationary distribution and first exit probabilities of a storage process with general release rule, Math. Oper. Res. 1 (1976) 347–358.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Keilson, A gambler's ruin type problem in queueing theory, Oper. Res. 11 (1963) 570–576.

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. Kaspi and D. Perry, Inventory systems of perishable commodities, Adv. Appl. Prob. 15 (1983) 674–685.

    Google Scholar 

  18. H. Kaspi and D. Perry, Inventory systems of perishable commodities with renewal input and Poisson output, Adv. Appl. Prob. 16 (1984) 402–421.

    Google Scholar 

  19. C. Knessl, B.J. Matowsky, Z. Schuss and C. Tier, Busy period distribution on state-dependent queues, Queing Systems 2 (1987) 285–305.

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. Loeve,Probability Theory, 3rd ed. (Van Nostrand, Princeton, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. Miyazawa, The intensity conservation law for queues with randomly changed service rates, J. Appl. Prob. 22 (1985) 408–418.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M.F. Neuts,Matrix-Geometric Solutions in Stochastic Models (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. London, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. Neveu,Martingales á Temps Discret (Masson, Paris, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  24. D. Perry and M.J.M. Posner, Analysis of production/inventory systems with several production rates, Stoch. Models 6 (1990) 99–116.

    Google Scholar 

  25. W.A. Rosenkranzt, Calculation of the Laplace transform of the length of the busy period for the M/GI/1 queue via martingales, Ann. Prob. 11 (1989) 817–818.

    Google Scholar 

  26. S. Schock Petersen, Calculation of ruin probabilities when the premium depends on the current reserve, Scand. Act. J. (1988).

  27. D. Sonderman, Comparing multi-server queues with finite waiting rooms, I, II, Appl. Prob. 11 (1979) 439–455.

    Google Scholar 

  28. D. Stoyan,Comparison Method for Queues and Other Stochastics Models (Wiley, 1983).

  29. W. Whitt, Comparing counting processes and queues, Adv. Appl. Prob. 13 (1981) 207–220.

    Google Scholar 

  30. R.W. Wolff, An upper bound for multi-channel queues, J. Appl. Prob. 14 (1977) 884–888.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Perry, D., Asmussen, S. Rejection rules in theM/G/1 queue. Queueing Syst 19, 105–130 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01148942

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01148942

Keywords

Navigation