Skip to main content
Log in

A review ofL=λW and extensions

  • Invited Paper
  • Published:
Queueing Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A fundamental principle of queueing theory isL=λW (Little's law), which states that the time-average or expected time-stationary number of customers in a system is equal to the product of the arrival rate and the customer-average or expected customer-stationary time each customer spends in the system. This principle is now well known and frequently applied. However, in recent years there have been extensions, such as H=λG and the continuous, distributional, ordinal and central-limit-theorem versions, which show that theL=λW relation, when viewed properly, has much more power than was previously realized. Moreover, connections have been established between H=λG and other fundamental relations, such as the rate conservation law and PASTA (Poisson arrivals see time averages), which show that there is a much greater unity in the overall theory than was previously realized. This paper provides a review.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. F. Baccelli and P. Brémaud,Palm Probabilities and Stationary Queueing Systems, Lecture Notes in Statistics 41 (Springer, New York, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  2. D.J. Bertsimas and D. Nakazato, The general distributional Little's law, Operations Research Center, MIT (1990).

  3. P. Brémaud, Characteristics of queueing systems observed at events and the connection between stochastic intensity and Palm probability, Queueing Systems 5 (1989) 99–112.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. Brémaud, An elementary proof of Sengupta's invariance relation and a remark on Miyazawa's conservation principle, J. Appl. Prob., to appear.

  5. P. Brémaud, R. Kannurpatti and R. Mazumdar, Event and time averages: a review and some generalizations, Adv. Appl. Prob. 23 (1991), to appear.

  6. P.H. Brill and M.J.M. Posner, Level crossing in point processes applied to queues: single-server case, Oper. Res. 25 (1977) 662–674.

    Google Scholar 

  7. P.H. Brill and M.J.M. Posner, The system point method in exponential queues: a level crossing approach, Math. Oper. Res. 6 (1981) 31–49.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S.L. Brumelle, On the relation between customer and time averages in queues, J. Appl. Prob. 8 (1971) 508–520.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S.L. Brumelle, A generalization ofL=λW to moments of queue length and waiting times, Oper. Res. 20 (1972) 1127–1136.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.P. Buzen, Fundamental operational laws of computer system performance, Acta Informatica 7 (1976) 167–182.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J.S. Carson and A.M. Law, Conservation equations and variance reduction in queueing simulations, Oper. Res. 28 (1980) 535–546.

    Google Scholar 

  12. K.L. Chung,A Course in Probability Theory, 2nd ed. (Academic Press, New York, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Cobham, Priority assignment in waiting line problems, Oper. Res. 2 (1954) 70–76.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J.W. Cohen, On up- and downcrossings, J. Appl. Prob. 14 (1977) 405–410.

    Google Scholar 

  15. P.J. Denning, and J.P. Buzen, The operational analysis of queueing network models, Comp. Surveys 10 (1978) 225–261.

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. Eilon, A simpler proof ofL=λW, Oper. Res. 17 (1969) 915–917.

    Google Scholar 

  17. S.N. Ethier and T.G. Kurtz,Markov Processes, Characterization and Convergence (Wiley, New York, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  18. H. Eves and C.V. Newson,An Introduction to the Foundations and Fundamental Concepts of Mathematics, 2nd ed. (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  19. J.M. Ferrandiz and A.A. Lazar, Rate conservation for stationary processes, J. Appl. Prob., to appear.

  20. P. Franken, Some applications of the theory of stochastic point processes in queueing theory, Math. Nachr. 70 (1976) 303–319 (in German).

    Google Scholar 

  21. P. Franken, D. König, U. Arndt, and V. Schmidt,Queues and Point Processes, (AkademieVerlag, Berlin, 1981, and Wiley, New York, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  22. P.W. Glynn and W. Whitt, A central limit theorem version ofL=λW, Queueing Systems 1 (1986) 191–215.

    Google Scholar 

  23. P.W. Glynn and W. Whitt, Sufficient conditions for functional-limit-theorem versions ofL=λW, Queueing Systems 1 (1987) 279–287.

    Google Scholar 

  24. P.W. Glynn and W. Whitt, Ordinary CLT and WLLN versions ofL=λW, Math. Oper. Res. 13 (1988) 674–692.

    Google Scholar 

  25. P.W. Glynn and W. Whitt, An LIL version ofL=λW, Math. Oper. Res. 13 (1988) 693–710.

    Google Scholar 

  26. P.W. Glynn and W. Whitt, Indirect estimation viaL=λW, Oper. Res. 37 (1989) 82–103.

    Google Scholar 

  27. P.W. Glynn and W. Whitt, Extensions of the queueing relationsL=λW and H=λG, Oper. Res. 37 (1989) 634–644.

    Google Scholar 

  28. P.W. Glynn and W. Whitt, The asymptotic efficiency of simulation estimators, Oper. Res. 40 (1992), to appear.

  29. S. Halfin and W. Whitt, An extremal property of the FIFO discipline via an ordinal version ofL=λW, Commun. Statist.-Stochastic Models 5 (1989) 515–529.

    Google Scholar 

  30. R. Haji and G.F. Newell, A relation between stationary queue and waiting-time distributions, J. Appl. Prob. 8 (1971) 617–620.

    Google Scholar 

  31. D.P. Heyman and M.J. Sobel,Stochastic Models in Operations Research, vol. 1 (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  32. D.P. Heyman and S. Stidham, Jr., The relation between customer and time averages in queues, Oper. Res. 28 (1980) 983–994.

    Google Scholar 

  33. W.S. Jewell, A simple proof ofL=λW, Oper. Res. 15 (1967) 1109–1116.

    Google Scholar 

  34. J. Keilson and L.D. Servi, A distributional form of Little's law, Oper. Res. Lett. 7 (1988) 223–227.

    Google Scholar 

  35. J. Keilson and L.D. Servi, The distributional form of Little's law and the Fuhrmann-Cooper decomposition, Oper. Res. Lett. 9 (1990) 239–247.

    Google Scholar 

  36. D. König and V. Schmidt, Imbedded and non-imbedded stationary characteristics of queueing systems with varying service rate and point processes, J. Appl. Prob. 17 (1980) 753–767.

    Google Scholar 

  37. D. König and V. Schmidt, Relationships between time and customer stationary characteristics of queueing systems, in:Point Processes and Queueing Systems, eds. P. Bartfai and J. Tomko (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1981) pp. 181–225.

    Google Scholar 

  38. D. König and V. Schmidt, EPSTA: the coincidence of time-stationary and customer-stationary distributions, Queueing Systems 5 (1989) 247–264.

    Google Scholar 

  39. M. Krakowski, Conservation methods in queueing theory, Rev. Franc. Automat. Inform. Rech. Oper. 7 (1973) 63–83.

    Google Scholar 

  40. A.M. Law, Efficient estimators for simulated queueing systems, Manag. Sci. 22 (1975) 30–41.

    Google Scholar 

  41. E.D. Lazowska, J. Zahorjan, G.S. Graham and K.C. Sevcik,Quantitative System Performance, Computer System Analysis Using Queueing Network Models (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  42. J.D.C. Little, A proof for the queueing formula:L=λW, Oper. Res. 9 (1961) 383–387.

    Google Scholar 

  43. W.L. Maxwell, On the generality of the equationL=λW, Oper. Res. 18 (1970) 172–174.

    Google Scholar 

  44. R. Mazumdar, R. Kannurpatti and C. Rosenberg, On rate conservation law for non-stationary processes, J. Appl. Prob., to appear.

  45. J. McKenna, A generalization of Little's law to moments of queue lengths and waiting times in closed, product-form queueing networks, J. Appl. Prob. 26 (1989) 121–133.

    Google Scholar 

  46. B. Melamed and W. Whitt, On arrivals that see time averages, Oper. Res. 38 (1990) 156–172.

    Google Scholar 

  47. M. Miyazawa, Time and customer processes in queues with stationary inputs, J. Appl. Prob. 14 (1977) 349–357.

    Google Scholar 

  48. M. Miyazawa, A formal approach to queueing processes in the steady state and their applications, J. Appl. Prob. 16 (1979) 332–346.

    Google Scholar 

  49. M. Miyazawa, The derivation of invariance relations in complex queueing systems with stationary inputs, Adv. Appl. Prob. 15 (1983) 874–885.

    Google Scholar 

  50. M. Miyazawa, The intensity conservation law for queues with randomly changed service rate, J. Appl. Prob. 22 (1985) 408–418.

    Google Scholar 

  51. M. Miyazawa, Derivation of Little's and related formulas by rate conservation law with multiplicity, Department of Information Sciences, Science University of Tokyo (1990).

  52. P.M. Morse,Queues, Inventories and Maintenance (Wiley, New York, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  53. G.F. Newell,Applications of Queueing Theory (Chapman and Hall, London, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  54. A. Nozari and W. Whitt, Estimating average production intervals using inventory measurements: Little's law for partially observable processes, Oper. Res. 36 (1988) 308–323.

    Google Scholar 

  55. M.G. Ramalhoto, J.A. Amaral, and M.T. Cochita, A survey of J. Little's formula, Int. Stat. Rev. 51 (1983) 255–278.

    Google Scholar 

  56. S.O. Rice, Single-server systems — I. relations between some averages, Bell Sys. Tech. J. 11 (1962) 269–278.

    Google Scholar 

  57. T. Rolski,Stationary Random Processes Associated with Point Processes, Lecture Notes in Statistics 5 (Springer, New York, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  58. T. Rolski and S. Stidham, Jr., Continuous versions of the queueing formulasL=λW and H=λG, Oper. Res. Lett. 2 (1983) 211–215.

    Google Scholar 

  59. K. Sigman, A note on a sample-path rate conservation law and its relationship with H=λG, Department of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research, Columbia University (1990).

  60. S. Stidham, Jr.,Static Decision Models for Queueing Systems with Non-Linear Waiting Costs, Ph.D. dissertation and Tech. Rept. 9, Department of Operations Research, Stanford University (1968).

  61. S. Stidham, Jr., On the optimality of the single-server queueing system, Oper. Res. 18 (1970) 708–732.

    Google Scholar 

  62. S. Stidham, Jr.,L=λW: a discounted analogue and a new proof, Oper. Res. 20 (1972) 1115–1126.

    Google Scholar 

  63. S. Stidham, Jr., Regenerative processes in the theory of queues, with applications to the alternating-priority queue, Adv. Appl. Prob. 4 (1972) 542–577.

    Google Scholar 

  64. S. Stidham, Jr., A last word onL=λW, Oper. Res. 22 (1974) 417–421.

    Google Scholar 

  65. S. Stidham, Jr., On the relation between time averages and customer averages in stationary random marked point processes, Technical Report 79-1, Department of Industrial Engineering, North Carolina State University (1979).

  66. S. Stidham, Jr., Sample-path analysis of queues, in:Applied Probability -Computer Science: The Interface, vol. 2, eds. R.L. Disney and T.J. Ott (Birkhäuser, Boston, 1982) pp. 41–70.

    Google Scholar 

  67. S. Stidham, Jr., On the relation between time averages and customer averages in queues, in:Variational Methods and Stochastic Analysis, eds. H.-J. Kimn and D.M. Chung,Proc. Workshop in Pure Mathematics 9 (1990) pp. 243–278.

  68. S. Stidham, Jr. and M. El-Taha, Sample-path analysis of processes with imbedded point processes, Queueing Systems 5 (1989) 131–166.

    Google Scholar 

  69. J. Walrand,An Introduction to Queueing Networks (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  70. R.W. Wolff, Poisson arrivals see time averages, Oper. Res. 30 (1982) 232–233.

    Google Scholar 

  71. R.W. Wolff, Sample-path derivations of the excess, age and spread distributions, J. Appl. Prob. 25 (1988) 432–436.

    Google Scholar 

  72. R.W. Wolff,Stochastic Modeling and the Theory of Queues (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  73. M.A. Zazanis, Sample path analysis of level crossings for the workload process, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences, Northwestern University.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper is dedicated to the memory of our colleague Professor Peter Franken (1937–1989), who contributed greatly to the subject of this paper and to queueing theory more generally.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Whitt, W. A review ofL=λW and extensions. Queueing Syst 9, 235–268 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01158466

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01158466

Keywords

Navigation