Skip to main content
Log in

Palmtop computerized reminding devices: The effectiveness of the temporal properties of warning signals

  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An intention requires us to carry out an action at a certain time or in an unscheduled time frame. In recent years, palmtop computerized devices with special functions have been developed that enable individuals to better remember their intentions. People record their intention in the device and are later reminded of their intention by a warning signal, such as an audible beep, that is presented along with a message about what is to be done. The present research investigated the psychological effects of the warning signals provided by palmtop reminding devices. Four experiments demonstrated that the effectiveness of an audible warning signal in the form of a signal was greatest early in the day. The interval between the signal and time to carry out the act, called here the anticipatory lag, did not significantly influence the timeliness of responses and remembering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrzejewski, S. J., Moore, C. M., Corvette, M., and Herrmann, D. (1991). Prospective memory skills.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 29, 304–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, W. (1994). The validity of autobiographical recall. In N. Schwarz and S. Sudman (eds.)Autobiographical Memory and the Validity of Retrospective Reports. New York: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceci, S. J. and Bronfenbrenner, U. (1985). “Don't forget to take the cupcakes out of the oven”: Prospective memory, strategic time-monitoring, and context.Child Development. 56, 152–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn, J. (1996). Assessemnt and treatment of prospective memory deficits. In M. Brandimonte, G. Einstein, and McDaniel (eds.) Prospective memory:Theory and applications. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorner, D. (1987) Memory systems and the regulation of behavior. In E. van der Meer and J. Hoffmann (eds.)Knowledge Aided Information Processing. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, J. (1996). Prospective memory or the realization of delayed intentions. In M. Brandimonte, G. Einstein, and McDaniel (eds.)Prospective memory: Theory and applications. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folkard, S. (1979). Time of day and level of processing.Memory and Cognition. 7, 247–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, R., Hart, J., and Sheehan, M. (1972). A prosthetic memory: An application of the prosthetic environment concept.Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin. 15, 80–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorayska, B., and Mey, J. L. (1996). Of minds and men. In B. Gorayska and J. L. Mey (eds.)Cognitive Technology: In search of a human interface. 1–24. Amsterdam: Elservier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J.E. (1980a). Memory aids people use: Two interview studies.Memory and Cognition. 8, 31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J.E. (1980b). We have ways of helping you to remember.Journal of the British Association for Service to the Elderly. 17 (May). 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J.E. (1984b). Methods of improving memory. In B.A. Wilson and N. Moffatt (eds.)Clinical Management of Memory Problems. Beckenham: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J.E. and Wilkins, A.J. (1982). Remembering to do things: A theoretical framework and an illustrative experiment.Human Learning, 1, 123–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, I.M.L. (1957).Memory. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, D. (1996). Improving Prospective Memory. In M. Brandimonte, G. Einstein, and McDaniel (eds.) Prospective memory: Theory and applications. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, D., Yoder, C., Wells, J., and Raybeck, D. (1996). Portable electronic scheduling and reminding devices.Cognitive Technology. 1, 36–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, D. (1994). The validity of retrospective reportes as a function of thedirectness of retrieval processes. InN. Schwarz andS. Sudman (Eds..Autobiographical Memory and the Validity of Retrospective Reports. New York: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, D. J. and Petro, S. (1990). Commercial memory aids.Applied Cognitive Psychology. 4, 439–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intons-Peterson, M.J. and Fournier, J. (1986). External and internal memory aids: When and how often do we use them?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 115, 267–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intons-Peterson, M.J. (1993). External and internal memory aids: When and how often do we use them? In C. Izawa (ed.)Applied Cognitive Psychology. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapur, N. (1995). Memory aids in the rehabilitation of memory disordered patients. In A. D. Baddeley, B. A. Wilson, and F. N. Watts (eds)Handbook of Memory Disorders. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurlychek, R. T. (1983). Use of a digital alarm chronograph as a memory aid in early dementia.Clinical Gerontologist. 1, 93–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leirer, V. O., Morrow, D. G., Tanke, E., and Pariante, G. M. (1991). Elder's nonadherence: Its assessment and medication reminding by voice mail.Gerontology. 31, 514–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantyla, T. (1994). Remembering to remembering: Adult age differences in prospective memory.Journal of Gerontology. 49, 276–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, M. A. and Einstein G. O. (1992). Aging and prospective memory: Basic findings and applications. In T. E. Scruggs and M. A. Mastropieri (eds.)Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities. 7, 87–105. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meacham, J. A. and Leiman, B. (1982). Remembering to perform future actions. In U. Neisser (ed.)Memory Observed: Remembering in natural contexts. 327–336. San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naugle, R., Prevey, M., Naugle, C., and Delaney, R. (1988) New digital watch as a compensatory device for memory dysfunction.Cognitive Rehabilitation. 6, 22–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parente, R. and Herrmann, D. (1996).Retraining Cognition. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, D. C., and Kidder, D. P. (1996). Prospective memory and medication adherence. In M. Brandimonte, G. Einstein, and McDaniel (eds.)Prospective memory: Theory and applications. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petro, S., Herrmann, D., Burrows, D., and Moore, C. (1991). Usefulness of commercial memory aids as a function of age.International Journal of Aging and Human Development. 33, 295–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, A. B. and Harris, J. L. (1991). Use of external aids with a head injured patient.The American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 46, 163–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searleman, A., and Herrmann, D. (1994).Memory from a Broader Perspective. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagenaar, W. A. (1986). My memory: A study of autobiographical memory over six years.Cognitive Psychology. 18, 225–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer, B. J. (1962).Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglas Herrmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Herrmann, D., Sheets, V., Wells, J. et al. Palmtop computerized reminding devices: The effectiveness of the temporal properties of warning signals. AI & Soc 10, 289–302 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01174604

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01174604

Keywords

Navigation