Skip to main content
Log in

Proactive management of distributed organisational computing: Prevention always pays, doesn't it?

  • Open Forum
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Organisations have eagerly adopted the new opportunities provided by distributed computing technology. These opportunities have also created new dependency on the technology and threats of technical problems. Information technology (IT) management has to choose its position towards these new technical risks. Should the problems be prevented proactively in advance or settled reactively afterwards?

This paper draws conclusions from an action research case study aimed at proactive versus reactive end-user support. Between 1994 and 1997 one of the business units in Nokia Telecommunications required a new approach for its distributed information systems (IS) to facilitate rapid organisational growth. The distributed IS and its end-user support were established and organised during a 30-month re-engineering process.

These results provide a new view to the dependencies between business processes and IT. The new distributed IT has become, often insidiously, a necessity for vital business processes. Therefore, risk management should be adopted as a standard tool for IS management to identify such dependencies. Proactive actions should be aimed at those areas where IT-related business risks are identified. Proactivity should be supplemented by reactive support to provide daily assistance for the end-users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austin, T. et al. (1997). Industry Trends Scenario: Rethinking the IT Investment Paradigm. InStrategic Analysis Report. Gartner Group, 28 March 1997.

  • Barney, J.B. (1997). Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bento R.F. (1996). Life in the Middle: An Analysis of Information Centers from the Perspective of their Major Stakeholders,Information & Management.30. 101–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, K.-E. (1994). Yrityksen riskinhallinta [Managing Business Risks]. Suomen vakuutusalan koulutus ja kustannus Oy.

  • Bödker, S. (1994). Understanding Computing Applications in Use: A Human Activity Analysis. Draft, January 1994.

  • Broadbent, M., Weill, P., O'Brien, T. and Neo, B.S. (1996). Firm Context and Patterns of IT Infrastructure Capability. In DeGross Jarvenpaa and Srinivasan (eds) Proceedings of the 17th ICIS, 16–18 December 1996, Cleveland, OH. ACM, New York, 174–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, N. (1995). Effective User Support: How to Manage the IT Help Desk. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappuccio, D., Kirwin, W. and Pawlick, L. (1996). Total Cost of Ownership: Reducing PC/LAN Costs in the Enterprise.Gartner Group Strategic Analysis Report, 9 February 1996.

  • Champy, J., and Hammer, M. (1993). Re-engineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution. HarperCollins, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortada, J.W. (1998). Best Practices in Information Technology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsman, L. (1997). Re-engineering End-User Support within Distributed Organizational Computing. InProceedings of the SCI '97. Caracas, Venezuela, July 1997.

  • Heikkilä, J. (1995). The Diffusion of a Learning Intensive Technology into Organisations. Helsinki School of Economics and Business Administration (A-104).

  • Iivari, J. (1992). The Organizational Fit of Information Systems,Journal of Information Systems.2. 3–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kast, F. and Rosenzweig, J. (1973). Contingency Views of Organization and Management. Science Research Associates, Chicago, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcella, R. and Middleton, I. (1996). The Role of the Help Desk in the Strategic Management of Information systems,OCLC Systems & Services.12(4). 4–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, J. (1996). Managing Client/Server Environments. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. (1997). Readers rate Software Support and Satisfaction,PC Magazine.16 (13).

  • Orfali, R., Harkey, D. and Edwards, J. (1994). Essential Client/Server Survival Guide. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panko, R.R. (1988). End User Computing: Management, Applications and Technology. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, J.H. (1993). The End-User's Desktop: New Center of the Computing Universe. In CAUSE'93 Annual Conference, San Diego, CA (http://cause-www.colorado.edu/).

  • Raynolds, E. (1997). Client/Server Impact on Enterprise Support: An Overview, Presentation No. 812 on Support Services Conference East, Help Desk Institute, March 9–12, 1997, Audio tape.

  • Raynovich, R.S. (1997). Looking for E-mail,LAN Times.14(10). 33–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, B. (1986). The IBM Way. Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmela, H. (1996). The Requirements for Information Systems Planning in a Turbulent Environment. Turku School of Economics and Business Administration, Series A-1: 1996, Turku, Finland.

  • Strassmann, P. (1997). The Squandered Computer. Information Economic Press, New Canaan, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil, P. and Olson, M. (1989). An Assessment of the Contingency Theory of Management Information Systems,Journal of Management Information Systems.6 (1) 59–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wysocki, R.K. and DeMichiell, R.L. (1997). Managing Information Across the Enterprise. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yohe, M.J. (1996). Information Technology Support Services: Crisis or Opportunity,Cause/Effect.19 (3). 6–13 (http://cause-www.colorado.edu/); (http://www.educause.edu/).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lauri Forsman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Forsman, L. Proactive management of distributed organisational computing: Prevention always pays, doesn't it?. AI & Soc 12, 328–345 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01179805

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01179805

Keywords

Navigation