Abstract
Cunningham and Edmonds [4[ have proved that a 2-connected graphG has a unique minimal decomposition into graphs, each of which is either 3-connected, a bond or a polygon. They define the notion of a good split, and first prove thatG has a unique minimal decomposition into graphs, none of which has a good split, and second prove that the graphs that do not have a good split are precisely 3-connected graphs, bonds and polygons. This paper provides an analogue of the first result above for 3-connected graphs, and an analogue of the second for minimally 3-connected graphs. Following the basic strategy of Cunningham and Edmonds, an appropriate notion of good split is defined. The first main result is that ifG is a 3-connected graph, thenG has a unique minimal decomposition into graphs, none of which has a good split. The second main result is that the minimally 3-connected graphs that do not have a good split are precisely cyclically 4-connected graphs, twirls (K 3,n for somen≥3) and wheels. From this it is shown that ifG is a minimally 3-connected graph, thenG has a unique minimal decomposition into graphs, each of which is either cyclically 4-connected, a twirl or a wheel.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bixby, R. E.: Composition and decomposition of matroids and related topics, Ph. D. thesis, Cornell University. 1972.
Bondy, J. A., andU. S. R. Murty:Graph Theory with Applications. American Elsevier, New York. 1976.
Cornuéjols, G., D. Naddef, andW. R. Pulleyblank: Halin graphs and the traveling salesman problem.Mathematical Programming 26 (1983), 287–294.
Cunningham, W. H., andJ. Edmonds: A combinatorial decomposition theory,Canadian Journal of Mathematics 32 (1980), 734–765.
Dawes, R. W.: Minimally 3-connected graphs,Journal of Combinatorial Theory (B) 40 (1986), 159–168.
Halin, R.: On the structure onn-connected graphs. In:Recent Progress in Combinatorics, 91–102. Academic Press, New York, 1969.
Halin, R.: Untersuchungen über minimalen-fach zusammenhangende graphen,Mathematische Annalen 182 (1969), 175–188.
Hopcroft, J. E., andR. E. Tarjan: Dividing a graph into triconnected componentsSIAM Journal on Computing 2 (1973), 135–158.
Kanevsky A., andV. Ramachandran: Improved algorithms for graph fourconnectivity, In:28th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 252–259. IEEE, New York. 1987.
MacLane, S.: A structural characterization of planar combinatorial graphs,Duke Mathematics Journal 3 (1937), 460–472.
Mader, W.: Minimalen-fach zusammenhangende graphen mit maximaler kantenzahl,Journal für die reine angewandte Mathematik 249 (1971), 201–207.
Mader, W.: Ecken vom gradn in minimalemn-fach zusammenhangenden graphen,Archiv der Mathematik 23 (1972), 219–224.
Menger, K.: Zur allgemeinen Kurventheorie,Fundamenta Mathematicae 10 (1927), 96–115.
Rajan, A.: Algorithmic implications of connectivity and related topics in matroid theory, Ph. D. Thesis, Northwestern University. 1986.
Robertson, N.: Minimal cyclic-4-connected graphs,Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 284 (1984), 665–687.
Seymour, P. D.: Decomposition of regular matroids,Journal of Combinatorial Theory (B) 28 (1980), 305–359.
Truemper, K.: A decomposition theory for matroids. I. General results,Journal of Combinatorial Theory (B) 39 (1985), 43–76.
Tutte, W. T.:Connectivity in Graphs. University of Toronto Press, Toronto. 1966.
Whitney, H.: Non-separable and planar graphs,Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 34 (1932), 339–362.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Research partially supported by Office of Naval Research Grant N00014-86-K-0689 at Purdue University.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Coullard, C.R., Gardner, L.L. & Wagner, D.K. Decomposition of 3-connected graphs. Combinatorica 13, 7–30 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01202787
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01202787