Skip to main content
Log in

Scandinavian human-centred systems design: Theoretical reflections and challenges

  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Currently there is a clear trend towards questioning the traditional sovereign human self which for two hundred years has had an undisputed central status within European culture and philosophy. This challenges the tradition of anthropocentrism which in a Scandinavian computer science context has had two theoretical foundations: the workoriented design theory represented by the Scandinavian participatory design philosophy, and the idea of the computer to a rather passive medium for human communication. The process, reducing the computer to a rather passive medium for human communication. The paper firstly examines these two theoretical anthropocentric positions. Secondly it outlines the trend towards challenging the status of the human self within different research contexts. This trend represents a challenge for Human-centred systems design. Finally, it discusses the new demands for conceptualising basic IT research phenomena created by this development, with particular focus on the issue of human-centredness as a systems design strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Peter Bøgh Andersen (1990). A Theory of Computer Semiotics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter Bøgh Andersen, Berit Holmqvist and Jens F. Jensen (eds.) (1993). The Computer as Medium. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel Bell (1973) The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter L. Berger and Thomas Luckmann (1967). The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York.

  • Susanne Bødker (1991). Through the Interface — a Human Activity Approach to User Interface Design. Lawrence Erlbaum Ass. Publ., Hillsdale, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bo Dahlbom (ed.) (1993). Dennett and his Critics. Demystifying Mind. Blackwell, Oxford, UK and Cambridge, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bo Dahlbom (ed.) (1995). The Infological Equation. Essays in Honor of Börje Langefors. Gothenburg Studies in Information Systems. Report 6, March 1995, Göteborg.

  • Tom DeMarco (1978). Structured Analysis and System Specification. Yourdon Press, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel C. Dennett (1991). Consciousness Explained. Little, Brown and Co., Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Réné Descartes (1912). A Discourse on Method and Selected Writings. J. M. Dent and Sons, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Émile Durkheim (1895). Les règles de la méthode sociologique. Paris.

  • Pelle Ehn (1988). Work-Oriented Design of Computer Artifacts. Arbetslivscentrum, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niels Ole Finnemann (1994). Tanke, sprog og maskine. Akademisk Forlag, Aarhus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinz von Foerster (1993). Für Niklas Luhmann: Wie Rekursiv ist Kommunikation? in: Teoria Sociologica 1, 2.

  • Hans Ulrich Gumbrecht und K. Ludwig Pfeiffer (eds.) (1988). Materialität der Kommunikation. Frankfurt a. M.

  • Edmund Husserl (1973). Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität, erster Teil: 1905–1920, zweiter Teil: 1921–28, dritter Teil: 1929–35, Husserliana Bd. XIII–XV, Martinus Nijhoff, Den Haag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmund Husserl (1987). Cartesianische Meditationen. Felix Meiner Verlag, Hamburg, 2. edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Søren Kierkegaard (1968–70). Søren Kierkegaards papirer. Copenhagen.

  • Ole Fogh Kirkeby (1996). Omkring Heideggers teknologiopfattelse. Institut for Ledelse, Politik og Filosofi, Copenhagen Business-School.

  • Klaus Krippendorff (1994). A Recursive Theory of Communication, in: David Crowley and David Mitchell (eds.). Communication Theory Today. Polity Press, Cambridge UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Börje Langefors (1966). Theoretical Analysis of Information Systems. Studentlitteratur, Lund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenda Laurel (1993). Computers as Theatre. Addison-Wesley, Reading MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svend Erik Larsen (1996). Naturen er ligeglad. Naturopfattelser i kulturel sammenhæng.Munksgaard/Rosinante, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niklas Luhmann (1981). Wie ist soziale Ordnung möglich?, in Luhmann, Niklas: Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik II. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, Niklas (1984). Soziale Systeme. Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp. Translated into English,cf. Niklas Luhmann (1995). Social Systems. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niklas Luhmann (1992). What is Communication, in Communication Theory 2(3).

  • Niklas Luhmann (1995). Instead of a Preface to the English Edition: On the Concepts ‘Subject’ and ‘Action’, in: Niklas Luhmann: Social Systems. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R., & F. J. Varela (1980). Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Boston: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. & Varela, F. J. (1984). The Tree of Knowledge. Boston, MA: New Science Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marvin Minsky (1986). The Society of Mind. Simon & Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon Pask (1979). A Conversation Theoretic Approach to Social Systems, in F. Geyer and J. van der Zouwen (eds.): Sociocybernetics: An Actor Oriented Social Systems Theory. Martinus Nijhodd, Social Systems Section, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon Pask (1980). Developments in Conversation Theory—Part 1, in: International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 13.

  • Lars Qvortrup (1996). How is society Possible? The Epistemology of Social Constructivism, in: Cybernetics & Human Knowing 3(4).

  • Walter Schulz (1984). Philosophie in der veränderten Welt. Pfullingen.

  • John Searle (1995). The Construction of Social Reality. Penguin, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georg Simmel (1890). Über sociale Differenzierung. Sociologische und psychologische Untersuchungen. Duncker und Humblot, Leizpig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terry Winograd and Fernando Flores (1986). Understanding Computers and Cognition. A New Foundation for Design. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Yourdon (1982). Managing the System Life Cycle. Yourdon Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dan Zahavi (ed.) (1994). Subjektivitet og livsverden i Husserls fænomenologi.Modtryk, Aarhus.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars Qvortrup.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Qvortrup, L. Scandinavian human-centred systems design: Theoretical reflections and challenges. AI & Soc 10, 164–180 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01205280

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01205280

Keywords

Navigation