Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Early-connectionism machines

  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper I put forward a reconstruction of the evolution of certain explanatory hypotheses on the neural basis of association and learning that are the premises of connectionism in the cybernetic age and of present-day connectionism. The main point of my reconstruction is based on two little-known case studies. The first is the project, published in 1913, of a hydraulic machine through which its author believed it was possible to simulate certain “essential elements” of the plasticity of nervous connections. The author, S. Bent Russell, was an engineer deeply influenced by the neurological hypotheses on nervous conduction of Herbert Spencer, Max Meyer and Edward L. Thorndike. The second is the project, published in 1929, of an electromechanical machine in which the author, the psychologist J.M. Stephens, believed it was possible to embody Thorndike's law of effect. Thus both Bent Russell and Stephens referred to the principles of learning that Thorndike defined as “connectionist”. Their attempt was that of simulating by machines at least certain simple aspects of inhibition, association and habit formation that are typical of living organisms. I propose to situate their projects within the frame of thediscovery of a simulative (modelling) methodology which I believe might be considered an important topic of the “Culture of the Artificial”. Certain more recent steps toward such a methodology made by both connectionism of the 1950s and present-day connectionism are briefly pointed out in the paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Amit, D. (1995). The Hebbian Paradigm Reintegrated: Local Reverberations as Internal Representations,Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 18. 617–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.A. and Rosenfeld, E. (eds) (1988). Neurocomputing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boakes, R. (1984). From Darwin to Behaviorism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boring, E.G. (1946). Mind and Mechanism,American Journal of Psychology. 59. 173–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P.S. and Sejnowski, T.J. (1992). The Computational Brain. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordeschi, R. (1991). The Discovery of the Artificial: Some Protocybernetic Developments 1930–1940,AI & Society. 5. 218–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordeschi, R. (1998). La scoperta dell'artificiale. Psicologia, neurologia e macchine intorno alla cibernetica. Dunod-France, Milan. An enlarged edition is in preparation, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crevier, D. (1993). AI. The Tumultuous History of the Search for Artificial Intelligence. Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esper, E.A. (1966). Max Meyer: The Making of a Scientific Isolate,Journal for the History of the Behavioral Sciences. 2, 107–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esper, E.A. (1967). Max Meyer in America,Journal for the History of the Behavioral Sciences. 3. 107–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelperin, A., Hopfield, J.J. and Tank D.W. (1985). The Logic ofLimax Learning. In A. Selverston (ed.)Model Neural Networks and Behavior. Plenum, New York, 237–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, J.K. (1961). Self-Organizing systems: A Review and Commentary,Proceedings of the IRE 49. 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, R.D., Abrams, T.W., Carew, T.J. and Kandel, E.R. (1983). A Cellular Mechanism of Classical Conditioning inAplysia: Activity-Dependent Amplification of Pre-synaptic Facilitation,Science. 219. 400–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebb, D.O. (1949). The Organization of Behavior. Wiley and Chapman, New York and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrick, C.J. (1929). The Thinking Machine. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilgard, E.R. (1956). Theories of Learning. Appleton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, C.L. (1943). The Principles of Behavior. Appleton-Century, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology. Holt, New York. (Reprinted 1950, Dover, New York.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonçich, J. (1968). The Sane Positivist: A Biography of Edward L. Thorndike. Wesleyan University Press, Middletown, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, R.G. and Hull, C.L. (1931). An Electro-chemical Parallel to the Conditioned Reflex.Journal of General Psychology. 5, 262–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, W. (1905). Primer of Physiological Psychology. Dent, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, W. (1911). Body and Mind. Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. (1908). The nervous Correlate of Pleasantness and Unpleasantness,Psychological Review. 15. 292–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. (1911). The Fundamental Laws of Human Behavior. Badger, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. (1912). The Present Status of the Problem of the Relation Between Mind and Body,Journal of Philosophy. 9. 365–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. (1913). The Comparative Value of Various Conceptions of Nervous Function Based on Mechanical Analogies,American Journal of Psychology. 24. 555–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. (1934). Frequency, Duration and Recency vs. Double Stimulation,Psychological Review. 41. 177–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G.A., Galanter, E. and Pribram, K.H. (1960). Plans and the Structure of Behavior. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, M.L. and Papert, S. (1969). Perceptrons. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. (Reprinted 1988 with authors' new Prologue and Epilogue.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Negrotti, M. (1999). The Theory of the Artificial. Intellect Books, Exeter, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Donnell, J.M. (1985). The Origins of Behavorism. New York University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postman, L. (1947). The History and Present Status of the Law of Effect,Psychological Bulletin. 44. 489–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, F. (1958). The Perceptron: A Probabilistic Model for Information Storage and Organization in the Brain,Psychological Review. 65. 386–408. (Reprinted in Anderson and Rosenfeld, 1988.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D.E., McClelland, J.L. and the PDP Research Group (1986). Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, 2 vols. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, S.B. (1913). A Practical Device to Simulate the Working of Nervous Discharges,Journal of Animal Behavior. 3, 15–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, S.B. (1916). The Effect of High Resistance in Common Nerve Paths,Psychological Review. 23. 231–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, S.B. (1917a). Compound Substitution in Behavior,Psychological Review. 24, 62–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, S.B. (1917b). Advance Adaptation in Behavior,Psychological Review. 24. 413–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, T. and Cowie, R. (1992). Are Artificial Neural Nets as Smart as a Rat?,Network. 3. 47–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L.D. (1986). Behaviorism and Logical Positivism: A Reassessment of the Alliance. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, H. (1890). The Principles of Psychology (3rd edn). Longman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, J.M. (1929). A Mechanical Explanation of the Law of Effect,American Journal of Psychology.41. 422–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, J.M. (1931). Some Weaknesses in the Explanation of Habit Fixation as Conditioning,Psychological Review. 38, 137–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, J.M. (1967). The Process of Schooling: A Psychological Examination. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesauro, G. (1986). Simple Neural Models of Classical Conditioning,Biological Cybernetics. 55. 187–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesauro, G. (1990). Neural Models of Classical Conditioning: A Theoretical Viewpoint. In Hanson, S.J. and Olson, C.R. (eds)Connectionist Modeling and Brain Function. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 74–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E.L. (1911). Animal Intelligence. Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troland, L.T. (1928). The Fundamentals of Human Motivation. Van Nostrand, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, E.R. (1989). Neural Nets: From Hartley to Hebb and Hinton,Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 33. 348–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S.F. (1990). A Brief History of Connectionism and its Psychological Implications,AI & Society. 4. 17–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J.B. (1914). Behavior. Holt, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Communication Sciences, University of Saleno, I-84084, Fisciano, Italy

    Roberto Cordeschi

Authors
  1. Roberto Cordeschi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto Cordeschi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cordeschi, R. Early-connectionism machines. AI & Soc 14, 314–330 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01205514

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01205514

Keywords