Skip to main content
Log in

Observation levels and units of time: A critical analysis of the main assumption of the theory of the artificial

  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Negrotti's theory of the artificial is based on the fundamental assumption that the human being cannot select more than one observation level per unit of time. Since this assumption has important consequences for the theory of knowledge — knowledge cannot be synthesised but only further differentiated — its plausibility is tested against two aspects that characterise any theory of knowledge: knowledge production and knowledge application. The way in which the human being produces and applies knowledge is analysed, and a model of mind based on the transitoriness of its elements is proposed. The analysis confirms that only one observation level can be selected per unit of time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baars, B.J. (1995). A Cognitive Theory of Consciousness. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK (originally published 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertasio, D. (1993). Ars ex machina: L'artificiale e il dualismo della cultura. Quattroventi, Urbino.

  • Bertasio, D. (1996). Studi di sociologia dell'arte: L'esperienza estetica fra rappresentazione e generazione di artificiale. Franco Angeli, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertasio, D. (ed.) (1997). Professione artista: Un'indagine sociologica sulla creatività in pittura. Clueb, Bologna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertasio, D. (1998). Fra il bello e il brutto. In Bertasio, D. (ed.)Immagini sociali dell'arte. Dedalo, Bari.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccato, S. (1964). Un tecnico tra i filosofi: Come filosofare. Marsilio, Padua.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccato, S. (1966). Un tecnico tra i filosofi: Come non filosofare. Marsilio, Padua.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccato, S. (1972). La mente vista da un cibernetico. Eri, Turin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccato, S. (1987). La fabbrica del bello. Rizzoli, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccato, S. (1988). Il perfetto filosofo. Laterza, Rome and Bari.

    Google Scholar 

  • Civita, A. (1993). Saggio sul cervello e la mente. Guerini and Ass, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crick, F.H. (1994). The Astonishing Hypothesis: The Scientific Search for the Soul. Scribner, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crick, F.H. and Koch C. (1992). The Problem of Consciousness,Scientific American. 267. 111–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dascal, M. (1989). Artificial Intelligence and Philosophy: The Knowledge of Representation,Systems Research,6. 39–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, G.M. (1989). The Remembered Present: A Biological Theory of Consciousness. Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1983). The principles of Psychology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. (Originally published 1890, Holt, New York.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1983). Mental Models: Toward a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linguiti, G.L. (1980). Macchine e pensiero: Da Wiener alla terza cibernetica. Con un intervento di Silvio Ceccato, Feltrinelli, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G.D. (1983). On the Ability to Inhibit Simple Thoughts and Actions. I. Stop-Signal Studies of Decision and Memory,Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition.11. 675–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G. D. (1985). On the Ability to Inhibit Simple Thoughts and Actions. II. Stop-Signal Studies of Repetition Priming, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition.9. 585–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G.D. and Cowan, W.B. (1984). On the Ability to Inhibit Thought and Action: A Theory of an Act of Control,Psychological Review.91. 295–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti, G. (1993). The Mechanics of the Mind. Espansione, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti, G. (1994). A Mind Theory for the Human-Centredness Paradigm,AI & Society.8(4). 363–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti, G. (1997). La macchina estetica. Il percorso operativo nella costruzione dell' atteggiamento estetico. Franco Angeli, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti, G. (1998). Sociologia dell'arte e obiettività scientifica: un binomio non impossibile. In Bertasio (ed.)Immagini sociali dell'arte. Dedalo, Bari.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negrotti, M. (1993a). Per una teoria dell' artificiale,Prometheus.13. 21–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negrotti, M. (1993b). Towards a Theory of the Artificial,Cybernetics & Human Knowing 2. 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negrotti, M. (ed.) (1994). Understanding the Artificial. On the Future Shape of Artificial Intelligence. Springer, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negrotti, M. (ed.) (1995). Artificialia. La dimensione artificiale della natura umana. Clueb, Bologna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negrotti, M. (1996). L'osservazione musicale. L'artificiale fra soggetto e oggetto. Franco Angeli, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negrotti, M. (1997). La terza realtà. Introduzione alla teoria dell'artificiale. Dedalo, Bari.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D.A. and Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to Action: Willed and Automatic Control of Behavior. In Davidson, R.J., Schwartz, G.E. and Shapiro, D. (eds) Consciousness and Self-Regulation: Advances in Research, Vol. 4. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noton, D. and Stark, L. (1971). I movimenti degli occhi e la percezione visivaLe Scienze.37. 22–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qvortrup, L. (1995). Sistemi naturali, sociali e artificiali: verso una tassonomia dell'artificiale. In Negrotti, M. (ed.)Artificialia: La dimensione artificiale della natura umana. Clueb, Bologna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeke, G.N. and Edelman, G.M. (1995). A Darwinist View of the Prospects for Conscious Artifacts. In Trautteur, G. (ed.)Consciousness: Distinction and Reflection. Bibliopolis, Naples.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G. (1949). The Concept of Mind. Hutchinson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shallice, T. (1988). From Neuropsychology to Mental Structure. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B.C. (1996). On the Origin of Objects. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somenzi, V. (1995). Naturale e artificiale,Atti della LXIII riunione della SIPS. 121–131.

  • Styles, E.A. (1997). The Psychology of Attention. Psychology Press, Hove, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umiltà, C. (1988). The Control Operations of Consciousness. In Marcel, A.J. and Bisiach E. (eds)Consciousness in Contemporary Science. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umiltà, C. (1994). Attenzione e coscienza In Legrenzi, P. (ed.)Manuale di psicologia generale. il Mulino, Bologna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaccarino, G. (1974a). L'errore dei filosofi. G. d'Anna, Messina and Florence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaccarino, G. (1981). Analisi dei significati. Armando Armando, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaccarino, G. (1988). Scienza e semantica costruttivista. Clup, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaccarino, G. (1997). Prolegomeni. Società Stampa Sportiva, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F.J. et al. (1981). Perceptual framing and cortical alpha rhythm,Neuropsychologia.19, 675–686.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F.J., Thompson, E. and Rosch E. (1991). The Embodied Mind. Cognitive Science and Human Experience. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Glasersfeld, E. (1987). Wissen, Sprache und Wirklichkeit. Friedr. Vieweg, Braunschweig/Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. (1977). Psychological Principles. University Publications of America, Washington, DC. (Originally published 1920, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zambelloni, F. (1995). La metamorfosi dell' “esemplare’. In Negrotti, M. (ed.)Artificialia: La dimensione artificiale della natura umana. Clueb, Bologna.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giorgio Marchetti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marchetti, G. Observation levels and units of time: A critical analysis of the main assumption of the theory of the artificial. AI & Soc 14, 331–347 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01205515

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01205515

Keywords

Navigation