Abstract
In this paper recent research involving interdisciplinary ethnography is presented as an exploration of its contribution to studies of people and technology in the workplace. Three main patterns of interaction between ethnography and ‘the others’ are examined. First, the influence of ethnography in promoting people-oriented perspectives of technology is discussed with reference to workplace studies in manufacturing. Second, ethnography contribution to the development of hybrid methods for the design and implementation of technology for use in the workplace is illustrated by several examples of such frameworks. Third, the influence of ethnographic research to providing a theoretical basis for computer-mediated communication is explored and documented by analyses of design teams working together as part of construction projects. From a practical point of view, this exploration has resulted in a brief discussion of the broad range of ‘users’ in the real-life workplace who benefit from ethnographic research. Future work in this area will rely on a reflexive stance on the part of the ethnographer in relation to both users of technology and users of ethnography.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, B., Button, G. and Sharrock, W. (1993). Supporting the Design Process Within an Organisational Context. In De Michaelis, Simone and Schmidt (eds)Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Computer-Supported Co-operative Work, Milan, Italy, 13–17 September. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 47–59.
Bardram, J (1997). The Role of Workplace Studies in Design of Groupware. Position paper forWorkshop on Workplace Studies: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives, ECSCW'97, Lancaster University.
Beck, E. (1997). Ethnography and Political Awareness in CSCW. Position paper forWorkshop on Workplace Studies: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives, ECSCW'97, Lancaster University.
Boxer, P. and Cohen, B. (1997). Analysing the Lack of Demand Organisation. Position paper forWorkshop on Workplace Studies: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives, ECSCW'97, Lancaster University.
Brown, B. (1997). From the User to Use and Back Again: What Software Developers Do with the Concept of ‘the User’, and Some Suggestions on How this Might Help Ethnographers to Influence Systems Design. Position paper forWorkshop on Workplace Studies: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives, ECSCW'97, Lancaster University.
Bucciarelli, L.L. (1988): An Ethnographic Perspective on Engineering Design.Design Studies.9(3), 159–168.
Bucciarelli, L.L. (1994): Designing Engineers. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Coakes, J. (1999). The Budget Management System. Position paper forThird Human-Centred Technology Postgraduate Worshop, Brighton, 28–30 September.
Checkland, P. and Scholes, J (1990). Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Wiley, Chichester.
Cheung, L., and Holden, T. (1992). Systems, Knowledge and Design Process. Information Engineering Division, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, UK.
Clark, H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Clark, H. and Brennan, S. (1991). Grounding in Communication. 127–149 In Resnick, L.B., Levine, J.M. and Teasley, S.D. (eds)Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. American Psychological Association.
Clark, H. and Schaefer, E. (1989). Contributing to Discourse,Cognitive Science.13. 259–292.
Cohen, B. (1989). Justification of Formal Methods for System Specification,Software Engineering Journal. January.
Croft, R. (1997). Hybrid Methodologies for Practical Use. Position paper forWorkshop on Workplace Studies: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives, ECSCW'97, Lancaster University.
Devlin, K. and Rosenberg, D. (1996).Language at Work: Analyzing Communication Breakdown in the Workplace to Inform Systems Design. CSLI Lecture Notes 66, CSLI Publications, Stanford University.
Fitzpatrick, G. and Kaplan, S. (1997). Locale-Based Framework: Using Ethnography for Systems Design. Position paper forWorkshop on Workplace Studies: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives, ECSCW'97, Lancaster University.
Fruchter, R. (1998). Roles of Computing in P5BL: Problem-, Project-, Product-, Process-, and People Based Learning,Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design and Manufacturing.12. 65–67.
Heath, C. and Luff, P. (1991). Collaborative Activity and Technological Design: Task Coordination in London Underground Control Rooms. In Bannon, Robinson and Schmidt (eds)Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Computer Supported Co-operative Work, 25–27 September, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 65–80.
Hindmarsh, J., Fraser, M., Heath, C., Benford, S. and Greenhalgh, C. (1998). Fragmented Interaction: Establishing Mutual Orientation in Virtual Environments. InACM'98 Proceedings of CSCW'98, Seattle, 14–18 November, 217–226.
Hovenden, F. (1996). Exploring a Phenomenological Approach to Software Development. Unpublished PhD thesis, Brunel University.
Hughes, J.A., Randall, D. and Shapiro, D. (1992). Faltering from Ethnography to Design. In Turner and Kraut (eds)CSCW 92: Sharing Perspectives: Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Co-operative Work, 31 October–4 November, Toronto, Canada. ACM Press, New York, 115–122.
Hughes, J., King, V., Rodden, T. and Anderson, H. (1994). Moving Out from the Control Room: Ethnography in System Design. InProc. CSCW'94. ACM Press, New York.
Hutchison, C.S. and Rosenberg, D. (1994). The Organisation of Organisations,Journal of Information Technology (Special Issue on Organizational Perspectives on Collaborative Working).9, 1–19.
Lynch, M. (1991). Method: Measurement — Ordinary and Scientific Measurement as Ethnomethodological Phenomena. In Button, G. (ed.)Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Lynch, M. (1992). Extending Wittgenstein: The Pivotal Move from Epistemology to the Sociology of Science. In Pickering, A. (ed.)Science as Practice and Culture. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 215–265.
Lynch, M. (1993). Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action: Ethnomethodology and Social Studies of Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Komito, L. (1997). Groupware and a Study of Lotus Notes. Position paper forWorkshop on Workplace Studies: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives, ECSCW'97, Lancaster University.
Murray, D. (1993). An Ethnographic Study of Graphic Designers. In De Michaelis, G., Simone, C and Schmidt, K (eds)Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 13–17 September, Milan, Italy. Kluwer: Netherlands, 295–309.
Nardi, B.A. and Miller, J.R. (1989). Twinkling Lights and Nested Loops: Distributed Problem Solving and Spreadsheet Development.International Journal of Man-Machine Systems.34. 161–184.
Norman, D.A. (1993). Cognition in the Head and in the World: An Introduction to the Special Issue on Situated Action.Cognitive Science.17, 1–6.
Perry, M.J. (1998). Distributed Cognition and Computer Supported Collaborative Design: The Organisation of Work in Construction Engineering. Unpublished PhD thesis, Brunel University.
Perry, M., Fruchter, R. and Rosenberg, D. (1999). Co-ordinating Distributed Knowledge: A Study into the Use of an Organisational Memory,Cognition, Technology and Work: 142–152
Persson, P. (1997). Constraint Management in Distributed Military Command and Control Teams. Position paper forWorkshop on Workplace Studies: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives, ECSCW'97, Lancaster University.
Plowman, L., Rogers, Y. and Ramage, M. (1995). What are Workplace Studies For? In Mamolin, H., Sundblad, Y. and Schmidt, K (eds)Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on CSCW. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Pycock, J. and Bowers, J. (1996). Getting Others to Get it Right: Ethnography of Design Work in the Fashion Industry. In Ackerman (ed.)Conference on Computer-Supported Co-operative Work, Boston, MA. ACM Press, New York, 219–228.
Rauch-Hindin, W.B. (1988). A Guide to Commercial Artificial Intelligence. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Remboldt, U., Blume, C. and Dillman, R. (1985). Computer Integrated Manufacturing: Technology And Systems. Marcel Dekker, New York.
Robinson. M., 1993, ‘Design for unanticipated use’ inProceedings of the third European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Eds, De Michaelis, Simone & Schmidt. September 13–17, Milan, Italy, 187–202. Kluwer, Netherlands.
Rogers, Y. (1993). Co-ordinating computer-mediated work,Computer Supported Co-operative Work.1. 295–315.
Rosenberg, D. (1994). Design for Co-operation. Unpublished PhD thesis, Brunel University.
Schmidt, K. and Bannon, L. (1992). Taking CSCW Seriously: Supporting Articulation Work in CSCW, Vol. 1 Nos 1-2. Kluwer, Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Sharrock, W. and Anderson, R. (1986). The Ethnomethodologists. Tavistock, London.
Suchman, L. Plans and situated Actions. The problem of human machine communication. Cambridge University Press, 1987.
Star, S. L. (1989). The Structure of Ill-Structured Solutions: Boundary Objects and Heterogenous Distributed Problem Solving. In Gasser, M. and Huhns, S. (eds)Distributed Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 2. Pitman, London, 37–54.
van Maanen, J. (1979). The Fact of Fiction in Organisational Ethnography,Administrative Science Quarterly.24. 539–550.
Watson, C.W. (ed.) (1999). Being There: Fieldwork in Anthropology. Pluto Press, London.
Woolgar, S. (1988). Science: The Very Idea. Ellis Horwood, Chichester.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rosenberg, D. Three steps to ethnography: A discussion of interdisciplinary contributions. AI & Soc 15, 295–315 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01206112
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01206112