Skip to main content
Log in

Triggering artefacts

  • Open Forum
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper presents a general critique of the use of conceptual frameworks in design, illustrated by the well known synchronous/asynchronous, co-located/non-co-located framework. It argues that while frameworks are a necessary and inevitable starting point for design, the business of tailoring and adapting them to specific situations need not be ad hoc.Triggering artefacts are a way of systematically challenging both designers' preunderstandings and the conservatism of work practice. Experiences from the Great Belt tunnel and bridge project are used to illustrate howtriggering artefacts change themodality of designing for change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bannon, L. and Schmidt, K. (1989). CSCW: Four Characters in Search of a Context. InProceedings of the EC-CSCW '89. Proceedings of the First European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Gatwick, London, 13–15 September, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentey, R., Hughes, J. A., Randall, D., Rodden, T., Sawyer, P., Shapiro, D. and Sommerville, I. (1992). Ethnographically-Informed Systems Design for Air Traffic Control. InProceedings of ACM CSCW'92 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 123–129.

  • Bignoli, C., De Michelis, G. and Tinini, R. (1991). UTUCS: A support for synchronous and asynchronous communication. In K. Gorling and C. Sattler (Ed.),Proceedings of the International Workshop on CSCW, April 9–11, 1991. Institut für Informatik und Rechentechnik, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjerknes, G. and Bratteteig, T. (1988). The Memoirs of Two Survivors or Evaluation of a Computer System for Cooperative Work. InProceedings of ACM CSCW'88 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 167–177.

  • Coad, P. and Yourdon, E. (1991).Object-Oriented Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Yourdon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSanctis, G. and Gallupe, B. (1987). A foundation for the study of group decision support systems.Management Science, 33(5), 589–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Docherty, P. (1992).CSCW — A Promise Soon to be Realised? Swedish Telecom, K-Corporate Strategy, S-123 86 FARSTA, Sweden.

  • Ehn, P. (1988).Work-Oriented Design of Computer Artifacts. Stockholm, Sweden: Arbetslivscentrum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, S. F. (1987). Strategies for enouraging successful adoption of office communication systems.ACM TOOIS(5).

  • Floyd, C. (1984). A Systematic Look at Prototyping. InApproaches to Prototyping 1–18. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerson, E. M. and Star, S. L. (1986). Analysing Due Process in the Workplace.TOIS, 4(3), 257–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenbaum, J. and Kyng, M. (1991).Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grønbæk, K. (1991)Prototyping and Active User Involvement in System Development: Towards a Cooperative Prototyping Approach. Ph.D. Thesis, Computer Science Dept., University of Aarhus.

  • Grønbæk, K., Hem, J. A., Madsen, O. L. and Sloth, L. (1994). Cooperative Hypermedia Systems: A Dexter-Based Architecture.Communications of the ACM, 37(2), 64–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grønbæk, K., Kyng, M. and Mogensen, P. (1993). CSCW Challenges: Cooperative Design in Engineering Projects.Communications of the ACM, 36(6), 67–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grønbæk, K., Kyng, M. and Mogensen, P. (1995). Cooperative Experimental System Development cooperative techniques beyond initial design and analysis. InProceedings of the Computers in Context '95. Aarhus, Denmark.

  • Grønbæk, K. and Mogensen, P. (1994). Specific Cooperative Analysis and Design in General Hypermedia Development. InProceedings of the Participatory Design Conference (PDC). Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

  • Grønbæk, K. and Trigg, R. H. (1994). Design issues for a Dexter-based hypermedia system.Communications of the ACM, 37(2), 40–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grudin, J. (1989). Why groupware applications fail: problems in design and evaluation.Office: Technology and People, 4(3), 245–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C. and Luff, P. (1991). Collaborative Activity and Technological Design: Task Coordination in London Underground Control Rooms. In L. Bannon, M. Robinson, and K. Schmidt (Eds.),ECSCW '91. Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 65–80. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C. and Luff, P. (1992). Collaboration and Control. Crisis Management and Mutimedia Technology in London Underground Line Control Rooms.Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1(1), 69–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hekmatpour, S. and Ince, D. (1988).Software Prototyping, Formal Methods and VDM. Addison Wesley Ltd, Reading, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollan, J. and Stornetta, S. (1992). Beyond being there. In P. Baversfeld, J. Bennett, and G. Lynch (Ed.)Proceedings of the CHI '92: Striking a Balance. Monteray, CA. ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J., Randall, D. and Shapiro, D. (1991). CSCW: Discipline or Paradigm? A sociological perspective. In L. Bannon, M. Robinson, and K. Schmidt (Eds.),ECSCW '91. Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 309–323. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J., Randall, and Shapiro, D. (1993). From Ethnographic Record System Design — Some experiencies from the field.Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). An International Journal. 1(3), 123–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. A., Randall, D. and Shapiro, D. (1992). Faltering from Ethnography to Design. In J. Turner and R. Kraut (Eds.)Proceedings of ACM CSCW'92 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (115–122) Toronto: ACM.Hutchins, E. (1990). The Technology of Team Navigation. In J. Calegher Kraut, R.E. and Egido, C. (Eds.),Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work 191–220. Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishii, H. and Arita, K. (1991). ClearFace: Translucent Multiuser Interface for Team Work Station. In L. Bannon, M. Robinson, and K. Schmidt (Eds.),ECSCW '91. Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishii, H., Kobayashi, M. and Grudin, J. (1992). Integration of Inter-Personal Space and Shared Workspace: ClearBoard Design and Experiments. InProceedings of ACM CSCW'92 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 33–42.

  • Jackson, M. (1983).System Development. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jirotka, M., Gilbert, N., Luff, P. (1992). On the Social Organization of Organizations.Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1(1), 95–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, R. (1988).Groupware. Computer Support for Business Teams. The Free Press, New York and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, R., Sibbert, D., Benson, S., Martin, A., Mittman, R. and Saffo, P. (1991).Leading Business Teams. Addison Wesley Ltd, Reading, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaavé, B. (1990)Undersøgelse af brugersamspil i system til produktionsstyring. MSc. diss., Technical University of Denmark.

  • Kyng, M. (1988). Designing for a Dollar a Day.Office, Technology and People, 4, 157–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyng, M. (1991). Designing for cooperation: Cooperating in design.CACM, 34(12), 65–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackay, W. (1990).Users and Customizable Software: A Co-Adaptive Phenomenon. Doctoral dissertation, Sloan School of Management, MIT.

  • Mogensen, P. (1992). Towards a Provotyping Approach in Systems Development.Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 4, 31–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mogensen, P. (1994).Challenging Practice: an Approach to Cooperative Analysis. Ph.D., Ph.D thesis. Aarhus University, Daimi PB-465.

  • Mogensen, P. and Trigg, R. (1992). Arifacts as triggers for participatory analysis. In Kuhn, Muller, and Meskill (Ed.),Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference (PDC). Boston, MA.

  • Reder, S. and Schwab, R. G. (1990). The Temporal Structure of Cooperative Activity. InProceedings of ACM CSCW'90 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 303–316.

  • Robinson, M. (1991a). Double-Level Languages and Co-operative Working.AI & Society, 5, 34–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M. (1991b). Pay Bargaining in a Shared Information Space. In J. Bowers and S. Benford (Eds.),Studies in Computer Supported Cooperative Work: Theory, Practice and Design. Amsterdam, North Holland and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M. (1993). Design for unantcipated use... InProceedings of the ECSCW '93 (3rd. European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Milan, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M. and Bannon, L. (1991). Questoning Representations. In L. Bannon, M. Robinson, and K. Schmidt (Ed.),Proceedings of the ECSCW '91. Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodden, T. (1991). A Survey of CSCW Systems.Interacting with Computers, 3(3), 319–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K. (Ed.). (1993).Developing CSCW Systems: Design Concepts. Report of COST14 ‘CoTech’ Working Group 4. Risø National Laboratory, Cognitive Systems Group, Roskilde, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, K. and Wagner, I. (1993). Constructing the ‘Dossier Representatif’.Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). An International Journal, 1(4), 229–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Søgaard, P. (1988). Object Oriented Programming and Computerised Shared Material. In S. Gjessing and N. Gjessing K. (Ed.),Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Object Oriented Programming (ECOOP '88). Springer Verlag, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. (1987).Plans and situated actions. The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. and Trigg, R. (1991). Understanding Practice: Video as a Medium for Reflection and Design. In J. Greenbaum & M. Kyng (Eds.),Design at Work — Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Tang, J. and Isaacs, E. (1993). Why Do Users Like Video? Studies of Multimedia-Supported Collaboration.Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). An International Journal, 1(3).

  • Thompson, G. (1974). Three characterizations of communications revolutions. In S. Winkler (Ed.),Proceedings of the Computer Communication: Impacts and Implications: International Conference on Computer Communication. New York.

  • Trigg, R. H. (1993). Participatory Design meets the MOP: Informing the design of tailorable computer systems.ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems (submitted).

  • Whitaker, R. (1992)Venues for Contexture: A Critical Analysis and Enactive Reformulation of Group Decision Support Systems. PhD, Umeå University.

  • Wynn, E. (1991). Taking Practice Seriously. In J. Greenbaum and M. Kyng (Eds.),Design at Work 65–89. Lawrence Erlbaum, London and New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yourdon, E. (1982).Managing the System Life Cycle. Youdon Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mike Robinson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mogensen, P., Robinson, M. Triggering artefacts. AI & Soc 9, 373–388 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01210588

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01210588

Keywords

Navigation