Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of various basis image priors on MR Image MAP restoration

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We extend a previously reported technique for Magnetic Resonance Image (MRI) restoration, using a physical model (spin equation) and corresponding basis images. We determine the basis images (proton density and nuclear relaxation times) from the MRI data and use them to obtain excellent restorations.

Magnetic Resonance Images depend nonlinearly on proton density,ρ, two nuclear relaxation times,T 1 andT 2, and two control parameters, TE and TR. We model images as Markov random fields and introduce four maximuma posteriori (MAP) restorations, nonlinear techniques using several different prior terms which reduce the correlated noise in the basis images, thereby reducing the noise in the restored MR images. The “product” and “sum” forms for basis (signal) and spatial correlations are discussed, compared and evaluated for various situations and features.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C.J.G. Bakker and C.N. De Graff, “Precision in calculatedρ, T 1 andT 2 images as a function of data analysis method,”Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 6:3–8, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G.L. Bilbro, W.E. Snyder, S.J. Garnier, and J.W. Gault, “Mean field annealing: a formalism for constructing GNC-like algorithms,”IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 3(1):131–138, January 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Griff L. Bilbro and Wesley E. Snyder, “Applying mean field annealing to image noise removal,”Journal of Neural Network Computing, 1990.

  4. S.A. Bobman, S.J. Riederer, J.N. Lee, S.A. Suddarth, H.Z. Wang, B.P. Drayer, and J.R. MacFall, “Cerebral magnetic resonance image synthesis,”American Journal of Neuroradiology, 6:265–269, March/April 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S.A. Bobman, S.J. Riederer, J.N. Lee, S.A. Suddarth, H.Z. Wang, and J.R. MacFall, “Synthesized MR images: Comparison with acquired images,”Radiology, 155(3):731–738, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S.J. Garnier,Recovering Resolution and Reducing Noise in Basis Images via Optimization Methods using physical Models, PhD thesis, North Carolina State University, 1994.

  7. S.J. Garnier, G.L. Bilbro, J.W. Gault, and W.E. Snyder, “Magnetic resonance image restoration,”Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 5: 1994.

  8. D. Geman and S. Geman, “Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images,”IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, PAMI-6(6):721–741, November 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Just, H.P. Higer, and P. Pfannenstiel, “Errors inT 1-determination using multislice technique and Gaussian slice profiles,”Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 6:53–56, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.B. Kneeland, A. Shimakawa, and F.W. Wehrli, “Effect of intersection spacing on MR image contrast and study time,”Radiology, 158:819–822, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Liu, A.O.K. Nieminen, and J.L. Koenig, “Calculation ofT 1,T 2, and proton spin density images in nuclear magentic resonance imaging,”Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 85:95–110, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J.R. MacFall, S.J. Riederer, and H.Z. Wang, “An analysis of noise propagation in computedT 2, pseudodensity, and synthetic spin-echo images,”Medical Physics, 13(3):285–292, May/June 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Majumdar, H.D. Sostman, and J.R. Macfall, “Contrast and accuracy of relaxation time mesurements in acquired and synthesized multislice magnetic resonance images,”Investigative Radiology, 24(2):119–127, February 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R.C. Wright, S.J. Riederer, J.N. Lee, F. Farzaneh, and J.B. De Castro, “High-speed techniques for estimatingT 1,T 2, and density images,”IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, MI-6(2):165–168, June 1987.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garnier, S.J., Bilbro, G.L., Gault, J.W. et al. The effects of various basis image priors on MR Image MAP restoration. J Math Imaging Vis 5, 21–41 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01250251

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01250251

Keywords

Navigation