Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

A comparison of methods for the control of redundantly-actuated robotic systems

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mechanical hands, legged vehicles and cooperating manipulators are robotic systems containing closed kinematic chains which are typically driven by more actuators than required. As a result, the force distribution existing in these systems cannot be determined simply from the governing rigid-body statics or dynamics equations since these equations are underdetermined. Techniques have been proposed to overcome this obstacle — the most common being to formulate an optimization problem whose solution will be a force distribution which is optimal in a prescribed sense. A second approach which has been suggested is one in which the elasticity of the constituent bodies is considered in order to render the force-distribution problem determinate, in a manner analogous to the techniques typically used in structural mechanics to analyze hyperstatic structures. A third approach would be to deactivate certain actuators in order to reduce the number of unknowns so that the problem becomes determinate. In the present paper, these methods are compared and the first is shown to yield the best results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Orin, D. E. and Oh, S. Y.: Control of force distribution in robotic mechanisms containing closed kinematic chains,Trans. ASME, J. Dynamic Systems, Measurement Control,103(2) (1981), 134–141.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nahon, M. and Angeles, J.: Optimization of dynamic forces in mechanical hands,Trans. ASME, J. Mechanical Design,113(2) (1991), 167–173.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gorinevsky, D. M. and Shneider, A. Yu.: Force control in locomotion of legged vehicles over rigid and soft surfaces,Int. J. Robotics Res. 9(2) (1990), 4–23.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Umnov, N. V. and Pogrebniac, A. Y.: Body movement of walking machines during walking (in Russian), inProc. 4th World Congr. Theory of Machines and Mechanisms, Sept. 8–12, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, 1975, pp. 365–369.

  5. Zeghoul, S., Lallemand, J.-P. and Murguet, D.: Modelisation and simulation of mechanical process in hyperstatical gripping withn-contact points, inProc. 6th Romansy, 1987, 139–147.

  6. Lallemand, J.-P., in Boissonnat, J.-D., Faverjon B. and J.-P. Merlet (eds),Techniques de la Robotique, Tome 1. Architectures et Commande, Hermès, Paris, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gao, X. C. and Song, S. M.: Stiffness matrix method for foot force distribution of walking machines, inProc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, Cincinnati, OH, 1990, pp. 1470–1475.

  8. Gao, X. C., Song, S. M. and Zheng, C. Q.: A generalized stiffness matrix method for force distribution of robotic systems with indeterminacy, inProc. 1990 ASME Biennial Mechanisms Conf., Chicago, IL, Vol. DE-24, pp. 457–463.

  9. Mason, M. T.: Compliant motion, in M. Bradyet al. (eds),Robot Motion, MIT Press, MA, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nahon, M. and Angeles, J.: Cooperative control of multi-armed space manipulators,Canad. Aeronautics Space J. 37(2) (1991), 78–86.

    Google Scholar 

  11. McCormac, J. C.:Structural Analysis, Harper and Row, New York, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Matheson, J. A. L.:Hyperstatic Structures, Butterworth, London, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Golub, G. H. and Van Loan, C. F.:Matrix Computations, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Strang, G.:Linear Algebra and its Applications, Academic Press, New York, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tandirci, M., Angeles, J. and Ranjbaran, F.: The characteristic point and the characteristic length of robotic manipulators, inProc. 1992 ASME Biennial Mechanisms Conf., Scottsdale, AZ, Vol. DE-45, pp. 203–208.

  16. Angeles, J. and Gosselin, C.: Détermination du degré de liberté des chaînes cinématiques,Trans. Canad. Soc. Mech. Eng. 12(4) (1988), 219–226.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Popov, E. P.:Mechanics of Materials, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nahon, M. and Angeles, J.: Minimization of power losses in cooperating manipulators,Trans. ASME, J. Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control,114(2) (1992), 213–219.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Victoria, Victoria, B.C., Canada

    Meyer Nahon

Authors
  1. Meyer Nahon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nahon, M. A comparison of methods for the control of redundantly-actuated robotic systems. J Intell Robot Syst 14, 3–20 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01254005

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01254005

Key words