Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative study on linearized robot models

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For representing the input—output behaviour of a robot manipulator by a linear time-invariant model, four direct linearization schemes are: (i) state linearization, (ii) linearization based on an identification method, (iii) linearization based on neglecting velocity-dependent and gravity terms and (iv) linearization based on neglecting the velocity-dependent term only (rate linearization). In order to make an appropriate choice of linear model for the development of real-time control, these schemes are extensively studied in this paper. It is shown that the rate linearization method leads to a satisfactory tradeoff between computation, accuracy, and stability. In the case of high velocity motions, a combination of state linearization and rate linearization is proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Craig, J.J.,Introduction to Robotics: Mechanics and Control, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass. (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fu, K.S., Gonzalez, R.C., and Lee, C.S.G.,Robotics: Control, Sensing, Vision, and Intelligence, McGraw-Hill, Singapore (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Seraji, H., An approach to multivariable control of manipulators,Trans. ASME J. Dynam. System Meas. Control 109, 146–154 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Taha, Z. and Drazan, P.J., Optimal decoupled control of robot,Robotics and Comp-Intgt. Mfg. 5(2/3), 183–189 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goldenberg, A.A. and Bazerghi, A., Synthesis of robot control for assembly processes,Mech. Machine Theory 21(1), 43–62 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Golla, D.F., Garg, S.C., and Hughes, P.C., Linear state-feedback control of manipulators,Mech. Machine Theory 16, 93–103 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Leahy, M.B. Jr., Valavanis, K.P., and Saridis, G.N., Evaluation of dynamic models for PUMA robot control,IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 5(2), 242–245 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Khosla, P.K. and Kanade, T., Real-time implementation and evaluation of computed torque scheme,IEEE Trans. Robot. Automat. 5(2), 245–253 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Balafoutis, C.A. and Patel, R.V.,Dynamic Analysis of Robot Manipulators: A Cartesian Tensor Approach, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston M.A. (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Balafoutis, C.A., Patel, R.V., and Angeles, J., An integrated robot motion simulator: Linearized robot models,ASME Internat. Computers in Engg. Conf., Boston, Mass., pp. 95–100 (1990).

  11. Li, C.J., A new method for linearization of dynamic robot models,IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernet. SMC-20(1), pp. 2–17 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Swarup, A., Gopal, M. Comparative study on linearized robot models. J Intell Robot Syst 7, 287–300 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01257769

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01257769

Key words

Navigation