Skip to main content
Log in

Task decoupling in robot manipulators

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Task decoupling in robotic manipulators implies that there is a subset of joints primarily responsible for the completion of a subset of the manipulator task. In this paper, we take a novel and general view of task decoupling in which we identify link subsystems primarily responsible for completion of a subset of the manipulator task components, which is not necessarily position or orientation. Our analysis leads to the discovery of other decoupled manipulator geometries never identified before, wherein the decoupled system is responsible for a subset of degress-of-freedom involving a hybrid combination of both position and orientation. Closed-form inverse kinematic solutions for these manipulator geometries are therefore guaranteed. Task decoupling also implied singularity decoupling wherein singularities of decoupled subsystems are equivalent to the manipulator singularities. The analysis leads to a novel and efficient method for identifying the singularities and solving the inverse kinematics problem of six-axes manipulators with decoupled geometries. The practicality of the concepts introduced is demonstrated through an industrial robot example involving a hybrid position and orientation decoupling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Paul, R. P. and Stevenson, C. N.: Kinematics of robot wrists,Int. J. Robotics Res. 2(1) (1983), 31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pieper, D. L.: The Kinematics of Manipulators Under Computer Control, PhD Thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Featherstone, R.: Position and velocity transformations between robot end-effector coordinates and joint angles,Int. J. Robotics Res. 2(2) (1983), 35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hollerbach, J. M. and Sahar, G.: Wrist-partitioned, inverse kinematic accelerations and manipulator dynamics,Int. J. Robotics Res. 2(4) (1983), 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Elgazzar, S.: Efficient kinematic transformations for the PUMA 560 robot,IEEE J. Robotics and Automation 1(3) (1985), 142–151.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lee, C. S. G. and Ziegler, M.: Geometric approach in solving inverse kinematics of PUMA robots,IEEE Trans. Aerosp., Electr. Syst. 20(6) (1984), 695–706.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gupta, K. C.: Kinematic analysis of manipulators using the zero reference position description,Int. J. Robotics Res. 5(2) (1986), 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gupta, K. C.: Kinematic solutions of robots with continuous three-roll wrists using the zero reference position method, inProc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, Raleigh, NC, 1987, pp. 50–55.

  9. Wang, K. and Lien, T. K.: Structure design and kinematics of a robot manipulator,Robotica (1988), 299–309.

  10. Fijany, A. and Bejczy, A. K.: Efficient Jacobian inversion for the control of simple robot manipulators, inProc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, Philadelphia, PA, 1988, pp. 999–1007.

  11. Paul, R. P.:Robot Manipulators — Mathematics, Programming and Control, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fu, K. S., Gonzalez, R. C., and Lee, C. S. G.:Robotics: Control, Sensing, Vision, and Intelligence, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Craig, J. J.:Introduction to Robotics: Mechanics and Control, Addison—Wesley, Reading, MA, 2nd edn., 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wolovich, W. A.:Robotics: Basic Analysis and Design, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yoshikawa, T.: Analysis and control of robot manipulators with redundancy, in M. Brady and R. P. Paul (eds),Robotics Research: The First International Symposium, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1984, pp. 735–747.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kumar, A. and Waldron, K. J.: The workspace of a mechanical manipulator,Trans. ASME, J. Mechanical Design. 103(2) (1981), 665–672.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Emiris, D. M. and Tourassis, V. D.: Singularity-robust decoupled control of dual-elbow manipulators,J. Intelligent and Robotic Syst. (1993).

  18. Yoshikawa, T.: Translational and rotational manipulability of robotic manipulators, inProc. Amer. Contr. Conf., San Diego, CA, 1990, pp. 228–233.

  19. CRC Handbook of Mathematical Science, CRC Press, West Palm Beach, FL, 1978.

  20. Renaud, M.: Geometric and kinematic models of a robot manipulator: Calculation of the jacobian matrix and its inverse, inProc. 11th Int. Symp. Industr. Robots, Tokyo, 1981, pp. 757–763.

  21. Tourassis, V. D. and Ang Jr, M. H.: Identification and analysis of robot manipulator singularities,Int. J. Robotics Res. 11(3) (1992), 248–259.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tourassis, V. D. and Ang Jr, M. H.: A modular architecture for inverse robot kinematics,IEEE Trans. Robotics and Automation 5(5) (1989), 555–568.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tourassis, V.D., Ang, M.H. Task decoupling in robot manipulators. J Intell Robot Syst 14, 283–302 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01258353

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01258353

Key words

Navigation