Abstract
The relationship between organizational learning and organizational design is explored. In particular, we examine the information processing aspects of organizational learning as they apply to a two-valued decision making task and the relation of such aspects to organizational structure. Our primary contribution is to extend Carley's (1992) model of this process. The original model assumes that all data input into the decision making processes are of equal importance or “weight” in determining the correct overall organizational decision. The extension described here allows for the more natural situation of non-uniform weights of evidence. Further extensions to the model are also discussed. Such organizational learning performance measures provide an interesting framework for analyzing the recent trend towards flatter organizational structures. This research suggests that flatter structures are not always better, but rather that data environment, ultimate performance goals, and relative need for speed in learning can be used to form a contingency model for choosing organizational structure.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Ashby, W. R. (1968), “Principles of Self-Organizing Systems,” in Walter Buckley (Editor),Modern Systems Research for the Behavioral Scientist, Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Ben-Horim, M. and H. Levy (1975),Statics: Decisions and Applications in Business & Economics, New York, NY: Random House.
Brown, J.S., and P. Duguid (1991), “Organizational Learning and Communities of Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation,”Organization Science, 2(1), 40–56.
Carley, K.M. (Jan. 1990), “Coordinating for Success: Trading Information Redundancy for Task Simplicity,” inProceedings of the 23rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, Kona, Hawaii.
Carley, K.M. (1992), “Organizational Learning and Personnel Turnover,”Organization Science, 3(1), 20–46.
Cohen, M.D. (1991), “Individual Learning and Organizational Routine: Emerging Connections,”Organization Science, 2(1), 135–139.
Cyert, R.M., and J.G. March (1963),A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Drucker, P.F. (April 18, 1988), “Tomorrow's Restless Managers,”Industry Week, 25.
Fiol, C.M., and M.A. Lyles (1985), “Organizational Learning,”Academy of Management Review, 10, 803–813.
Garvin, D.A. (July–Aug. 1993), “Building a Learning Organization,”Harvard Business Review, 78–91.
Huber, G. P. (1990), “A Theory of the Effects of Advanced Information Technologies on Organizational Design, Intelligence, and Decision Making,”Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 47–71.
Huber, G.P. (1991), “Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures,”Organization Science, 2(1), 88–115.
Kim, D.H. (Fall 1993), “The Link between Individual and Organizational Learning,”Sloan Management Review, 37–50.
Lawrence, P.R., and J. Lorsch (1967),Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration, Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
Levitt, B., and J.G. March (1988), “Organizational Learning,”Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319–340.
March, J.G., and J.P. Olsen (1975), “The Uncertainty of the Past: Organizational Learning Under Ambiguity,”European Journal of Political Research, 3, 147–171.
March, J.G., and H.A. Simon (1958),Organizations, New York, NY: John Wiley.
March, J.G., L.S. Sproull, and M. Tamuz (1991), “Learning from Samples of One or Fewer,”Organization Science, 2(1), 1–13.
Norusis, M. J. (1988),SPSS PC Guide, Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.
Senge, P.M. (1994),The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, New York, NY: Doubleday/Currency.
Simon, H.A. (1947),Administrative Behavior, New York, NY: MacMillan.
Stinchcombe, A.L. (1990),Information and Organizations, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mihavics, K.W., Ouksel, A.M. Learning to align organizational design and data. Comput Math Organiz Theor 1, 143–155 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01299066
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01299066