Skip to main content
Log in

Pumping lemmas for the control language hierarchy

  • Published:
Mathematical systems theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigate a progression of grammatically defined language families, thecontrol language hierarchy. This hierarchy has been studied recently from the perspective of providing a linguistic framework for natural language syntax. We exhibit a progression of pumping lemmas, one for each family in the hierarchy, thereby showing that the hierarchy is strictly separable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. V. Aho. Indexed grammars—an extension to context free grammars.J. Assoc. Comput. Mech., 15:647–671, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Ginsburg and E. H. Spanier, Control sets on grammars.Math. Systems Theory, 2:159–177, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. A. Harrison.Introduction to Formal Language Theory. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. T. Herman and G. Rozenberg.Developmental Systems and Languages. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  5. O. H. Ibarra. Simple matrix languages.Inform, and Control, 17:359–394, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. K. Joshi, L. S. Levy, and M. Takahashi. Tree adjunct grammars.J. Comput. System Sci., 10(1), 1975.

  7. T. Kasai. An hierarchy between context-free and context-sensitive languages.J. Comput. System Sci., 4:492–508, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  8. N. A. Khabbaz. A geometric hierarchy of languages.J. Comput. System Sci., 8:142–157, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. A. Palis and S. Shende. Upper bounds on recognition of a hierarchy of non-context-free languages.Theoret. Comput. Sci., 98(2):289–319, May 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. J. Rozenkrantz. Programmed grammars and classes of formal languages.J. Assoc. Comput. Mech., 16:107–131, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Salomaa. Matrix grammars with a leftmost restriction.Inform, and Control, 20:143–149, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Salomaa.Formal Languages. Academic Press, New York, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. W. Thatcher. Tree automata: an informal survey. In A. V. Aho, editor,Currents in the Theory of Computing, pp. 143–172. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  14. K. Vijay-Shanker. A Study of Tree Adjoining Grammars. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. Vijay-Shanker and D. J. Weir. The equivalence of four extensions of context-free grammars.Math. Systems Theory, 27:511–546, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  16. D. J. Weir. Characterizing Mildly Context-Sensitive Grammar Formalisms. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, September 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. J. Weir. A geometric hierarchy beyond context-free languages.Theoret. Comput. Sci., 104:235–261, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research reported in this paper was conducted in part at the Department of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA, and was supported under ARO Grant DAA29-84-9-0027, NSF Grants MCS-8219116-CER, MCS-82-07294, DCR-84-10413 and MCS-83-05221, and DARPA Grant N00014-85-K-0018.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Palis, M.A., Shende, S.M. Pumping lemmas for the control language hierarchy. Math. Systems Theory 28, 199–213 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01303055

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01303055

Keywords

Navigation