Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An analysis of setup cost reduction in a two stage system

  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of investing in setup cost reduction in a two stage manufacturing process. Closed form relationships are developed for the cases of investment in primary stage setup cost reduction, investment in finishing stage setup cost reduction, and simultaneous investment in setup cost reduction in both stages. Numerical results are presented which compare each of the models to the basic model. These results indicate that when investment in both stages is feasible, it is most effective to simultaneously invest in setup cost reduction. Failing this, the next best alternative is to invest in setup cost reduction in the finishing stage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beek PV, Putten CV (1987) OR contributions to flexibility improvement in production/inventory systems. Europ J Oper Res 31:52–60

    Google Scholar 

  2. Billington PJ (1987) The classic economic production quantity model with setup cost as a function of capital expenditure. Decision Sci 18(1):25–42

    Google Scholar 

  3. Esrock YP (1985) The impact of reduced setup time. Production and Inventory Management 26(4):94–106

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hall R (1983) Zero Inventories. Dow Jones-Irwin, Homewood, Illinois

    Google Scholar 

  5. Monden Y (1981) What makes the Toyota production system really tick? Industrial Engineering, pp 36–46

  6. Monden Y (1981) Toyota Production Systems: Practical Approach to Production Management. Industrial Engineering and Management Press, Atlanta, Georgia

    Google Scholar 

  7. Paknejad MJ, Affisco JF (1987) The effect of investment in new technology on optimal batch quantity. Proceedings of the Northeast Decision Sciences Institute, pp 118–120

  8. Paknejad MJ, Nasri F (1988) Setup cost reduction in the classical production lot size with backorders model. Proceedings of the Northeast Decision Sciences Institute, pp 82–86

  9. Peterson R, Silver EA (1979) Decision Systems for Inventory Management and Production Planning. Wiley: New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Porteus E (1985) Investing in reduced setups in the EOQ model. Management Sci 31(8):998–1010

    Google Scholar 

  11. Porteus E (1986) Investing in new parameter values in the discounted EOQ model. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 33:39–48

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schonberger R (1982) Japanese Manufacturing Techniques — Hidden Lessons in Simplicity. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sugimori Y, Kusunoki K, Cha F, Uchikowa S (1977) Toyota production systems and kanban System — Materialization of Just-In-Time and Respect for Human systems. Inter J Prod Res 15:553–564

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paknejad, M.J., Nasri, F. & Affisco, J.F. An analysis of setup cost reduction in a two stage system. ZOR - Methods and Models of Operations Research 35, 505–532 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01415992

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01415992

Keywords