Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Decisions under risk and uncertainty: A survey of recent developments

  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This paper reviews recently proposed axiomatic models of choice under uncertainty and risk. The presentation focuses on the various models of transitive preferences which abandon the expected utility hypothesis by weakening the strong separability assumption known as the sure thing principle in the case of uncertainty and as the independence axiom in the case of risk. Special emphasis is on the remarkable similarities held in common by both the approaches to decisions under uncertainty and under risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allais M (1953) Le Comportement de l'Homme Rationnel Devant le Risque: Critique des Postulats et Axiomes de l'Ecole Americaine. Econometrica 21:503–546

    Google Scholar 

  • Anscombe FJ, Aumann RJ (1963) A Definition of Subjective Probability. Ann Math Stat 34:199–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Aumann RJ (1962) Utility Theory without the Completeness Axiom. Econometrica 30:445–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell D (1982) Regret in Decision Making under Uncertainty. Operat Res 30:961–981

    Google Scholar 

  • Chateauneuf A (1990) On the Use of Comonotonicity in the Axiomatization of EURDP Theory for Arbitrary Consequences. Paper presented at the V. International Conference on the Foundation and Application of Utility, Risk and Decision Theories, Durham (North Carolina)

  • Chew SH (1983) A Generalization of the Quasilinear Mean with Applications to the Measurement of Income Inequality and Decision Theory Resolving the Allais Paradox. Econometrica 51:1065–1092

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew SH (1989a) Axiomatic Utility Theories with the Betweenness Property. Ann Oper Res 19:273–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew SH (1989b) An Axiomatic Generalization of the Quasilinear Mean and Gini Mean with Application to Decision Theory. Johns Hopkins University and Tulane University; rewritten version of: An Axiomatization of the Rank-Dependent Quasilinear Mean Generalizing the Gini Mean and the Quasilinear Mean (1985). Working Paper 156, John Hopkins University

  • Chew SH, Waller WS (1986) Empirical Tests of Weighted Utility Theory. J Math Psych 30:55–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew SH, Epstein LG (1989a) The Structure of Preferences and Attitudes Towards the Timing of the Resolution of Uncertainty. Intern Econ Rev 30:103–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew SH, Epstein LG (1989b) A Unifying Approach to Axiomatic Non-Expected Utility Theories. J Econ Theory 49:207–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew SH, Epstein LG (1990) Nonexpected Utility Preferences in a Temporal Framework with an Application to Consumption-Savings Behaviour. J Econ Theory 50:54–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew SH, Epstein LG, Zilcha I (1988) A Correspondence Theorem between Expected Utility and Smooth Utility. J Econ Theory 46:186–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew SH, Karni E, Safra Z (1987) Risk Aversion in the Theory of Expected Utility with Rank-Dependent Probabilities. J Econ Theory 42:370–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Choquet G (1955) Theory of Capacities. Annales de l'Institut Fourier 5:131–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Debreu G (1954) Representation of a Preference Ordering by a Numerical Function. In: Thrall RM Coombs CH, Davis RL (eds) Decision Processes. Wiley, New York, pp 159–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekel E (1986) An Axiomatic Characterization of Preferences under Uncertainty: Weakening the Independence Axiom. J Econ Theory 40:304–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekel E (1989) Asset Demands without the Independence Axiom. Econometrica 57:163–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellsberg D (1961) Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms. Quarterly J Econ 75:643–669

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn PC (1970) Utility Theory for Decision Making. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn PC (1978) On Handa's New Theory of Cardinal Utility and the Maximization of Expected Return. J Polit Econ 86:321–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn PC (1982) Nontransitive Measurable Utility. J Math Psych 26:31–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn PC (1984) SSB Utility Theory and Decision-Making under Uncertainty. Math Social Sci 8:253–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn PC (1986) A New Model for Decisions under Uncertainty. Econ Letters 21:127–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn PC (1988) Nonlinear Preference and Utility Theory. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn PC, LaValle IH (1987) A Nonlinear, Nontransitive and Additive-Probability Model for Decisions under Uncertainty. Ann Stat 15:830–844

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilboa I (1987) Expected Utility with Purely Subjective Non-Additive Probabilities. J Math Econ 16:65–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandmont JM (1972) Continuity Properties of von Neumann-Morgenstern Utility. J Econ Theory 4:45–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Green JR (1987) Making Book Against Oneself. The Independence Axiom, and Nonlinear Utility Theory. Quart J Econ 98:785–796

    Google Scholar 

  • Green JR, Jullien B (1988) Ordinal Independence in Nonlinear Utility Theory. J Risk Uncert 1:355–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond PJ (1988) Consequentalist Foundations for Expected Utility. Theory and Decision 25:25–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazen GB (1987) Subjectively Weighted Linear Utility. Theory and Decision 23:261–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica 47:263–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Karni E, Safra Z (1989) Dynamic Consistency, Revelations in Auctions and the Structure of Preferences. Rev Econ Stud 56:421–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomes G, Sugden R (1982) Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice under Uncertainty. Econ J 92:805–824

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomes G, Sugden R (1987) Some Implications of a more General Form of Regret Theory. J Econ Theory 41:270–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Machina M (1982) ‘Expected Utility’ Analysis without the Independence Axiom. Econometrica 50:277–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Machina M (1987) Choice under Uncertainty: Problems Solved and Unsolved. J Econ Perspect 1:127–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Machina M (1989a) Comparative Statics and Non-expected Utility Preferences. J Econ Theory 47:393–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Machina M (1989b) Dynamic Consistency and Non-expected Utility Models of Choice under Uncertainty. J Econ Literat 27:1622–1668

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCrimmon KR, Larsson S (1979) Utility Theory: Axioms versus Paradoxes. In: Allais M, Hagen O (eds) Expected Utility Hypothesis and the Allais Paradox. Reidel, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura Y (1990) Subjective Expected Utility with Non-additive Probabilities on Finite State Spaces. J Econ Theory 51:346–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Puppe C (1990a) Preference Functionals with Prize-Dependent Distortion of Probabilities. Econ Letters 33:127–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Puppe C (1990b) Reduction of Decision Problems: Some Remarks on Rank-Dependent Utility Theory. Paper presented at the V. International Conference on the Foundation and Application of Utility, Risk, and Decision Theories, Durham (North Carolina)

  • Quiggin J (1982) A Theory of Anticipated Utility. J Econ Behavior and Organization 3:323–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein A (1988) Similarity and Decision-making under Risk (Is there a Utility Theory Resolution to the Allais Paradox?). J Econ Theory 46:145–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage LJ (1954) The Foundations of Statistics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmeidler D (1989) Subjective Probability and Expected Utility without Additivity. Econometrica 57:571–587 (First version 1982)

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal U (1987) Some Remarks on Quiggin's Anticipated Utility. J Econ Behavior and Organization 8:145–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal U (1989) Anticipated Utility: A Measure Representation Approach. Ann Operat Res 19:359–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal U (1990) Two-Stage Lotteries without the Reduction Axiom. Econometrica 58:349–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal U, Spivak A (1990) First Order versus Second Order Risk Aversion. J Econ Theory 51:111–125

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1944) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2nd edition (1947)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakker PP (1989) Additive Representations of Preferences. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakker PP (1990a) Under Stochastic Dominance Choquet-Expected Utility and Anticipated Utility are Identical. Theory Decis, forthcoming

  • Wakker PP (1990b) Additive Representations of Preferences on Rank-Ordered Subsets of Cartesian Products; Part I: The Algebraic Approach and Part II: The Topological Approach. Working Papers 9001 and 9002. Duke University, Fuqua School of Business

  • Weber M, Camerer C (1987) Recent Developments in Modelling Preferences under Risk. OR Spektrum 9:129–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaari M (1987) The Dual Theory of Choice under Risk. Econometrica 55:95–115

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kischka, P., Puppe, C. Decisions under risk and uncertainty: A survey of recent developments. ZOR - Methods and Models of Operations Research 36, 125–147 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01417213

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01417213

Keywords