Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cognitive ability and information retrieval: When less is more

  • Published:
Virtual Reality Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the use of virtual environments as a means of conveying semantic information relating to the contents of computerised textual databases. two empirical studies are reported that investigated the influence of individual differences in cognitive ability on search task performance. In the first experiment, objects (each representing a type of animal) were placed ordinally in a three-dimensional cube arrangement based on ratings of semantic similarity. Participants were required to locate a series of randomly selected objects. Contrary to prediction, participants with high associative memory were comparatively poorer performers. In a second experiment ‘true’ rating distances were used to locate objects in virtual space. High spatial ability was associated with better performance and, in contrast with the results of Experiment 1, this pattern also was replicated for associative memory. Implications are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fischer G, Stevens C. Information access in complex, poorly structured information space. In: Proceedings of CHI '91 ; 63–70

  2. Furnas GW. Navigation-by-query, query-by-navigation, and other tricks to try. In: Browsing vs. search: can we find a synergy. Panel (Mackinlay et al, eds), Proceedings of CHI '95; 180

  3. Mukherjea S, Foley JD. Showing the context of nodes in the World Wide Web. In: Proceedings of CHI '95; 326–327

  4. Chalmers M, Chiston P. Bead: explorations in information visualisation. In: Proceedings of SIGIR. London: Springer, 1992; 330–337

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen C. Bridging the gap: the use of pathfinder networks in visual navigation. Journal of Visual Language and Computing 1988; 9: 267–286

    Google Scholar 

  6. Krohn U. Visualization of navigational retrieval in virtual information spaces. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on New Paradigms in Information Visualization and Manipulation. Baltimore, MD, 2 December 1995; 26–32

  7. Mariani JA, Lougher R. Triplespace: an experiment in a 3D graphical interface to a binary relational database. Interacting with Computers 1992; 4: 147–162

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dillon A, McKnight C, Richardson J. Navigation in hypertext: a critical review of the concept. In: Proceedings of INTERACT '90. Amsterdam: North Holland 1990; 587–592

  9. Tolman EC. Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review 1948; 55: 189–208

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chen C, Czerwinski M. Spatial ability and visual navigation: an empirical study. The New Review for Hypertext and Multimedia 1997; 3: 40–66

    Google Scholar 

  11. Westerman SJ, Cribbin T. Mapping semantic information in virtual space: dimensions, variance, and individual differences. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, in press

  12. Egan DE. Individual differences in human-computer interaction. In: Handbook of human-computer interaction. Hellander M, ed. Elsevier Science: North Holland; 543–569

  13. Westerman SJ. Individual differences in human-computer interaction. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. Birmingham: Aston University, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  14. Carroll JB. Human cognitive abilities: a survey of factor analytic studies. Cambridge University Press, 1993

  15. Campagnoni FR, Erlich K. Information retrieval using a hypertext-based help system. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 1989; 7: 271–291

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vicente KJ, Hayes BC, Williges RC. Assaying and isolating individual differences in searching a hierarchical file system. Human Factors 1987; 29; 349–359

    Google Scholar 

  17. Westerman SJ. A comparison of the cognitive demands of navigating two- vs three-dimensional spatial database layouts. Ergonomics 1998; 41: 207–216

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chen C. Individual differences in a spatial-semantic virtual environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 2000; 51: 529–542

    Google Scholar 

  19. Battig WF, Montague WE. Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph 1969: 80: 1–46

    Google Scholar 

  20. Westerman SJ, CRibbin T. Navigating virtual information spaces: individual differences in cognitive maps. In: Proceedings of UK Virtual Reality Special Interest Group. Manchester, 1999; 95–105

  21. Smith P. Towards a practical measure of hypertext usability. Interacting with Computers 1996; 8: 365–381

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vidulich MA, Tsang PS. Collecting NASA workload ratings: a paper and pencil package. Working Paper. Moffett Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ekstrom RB, French JW, Harman HH. Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, 1976

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychology Institute, Aston University, B4 7ET, Birmingham, UK

    S. J. Westerman & T. Cribbin

Authors
  1. S. J. Westerman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. Cribbin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. J. Westerman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Westerman, S.J., Cribbin, T. Cognitive ability and information retrieval: When less is more. Virtual Reality 5, 1–7 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01418971

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01418971

Keywords

Search

Navigation