Skip to main content
Log in

Neural network models for breast cancer prognosis

  • Articles
  • Published:
Neural Computing & Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Estimating the risk of relapse for breast cancer patients is necessary, since it affects the choice of treatment. This problem involves analysing data of times to relapse of patients and relating them to prognostic variables. Some of the times to relapse will usually be censored.We investigate various ways of using neural network models to extend traditional statistical models in this situation. Such models are better able to model both non-linear effects of prognostic factors and interactions between them, than linear logistic or Cox regression models. With the dataset used in our study, however, the prediction of the risk of relapse is not significantly improved when using a neural network model. Predicting the risk that a patient will relapse within three years, say, is possible from this data, but not when any relapse will happen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL. The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. New York, Wiley, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baxt WG. Use of an artificial neural network for data analysis in clinical decision-making: the diagnosis of acute coronary occlusion. Neur Comp 1990; 2: 480–489

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baxt WG, Skora J. Prospective validation of artificial neural network trained to identify acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 1996; 347: 12–15

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bounds DG, Lloyd PJ, Mathew BG. A comparison of neural network and other pattern recognition approaches to the diagnosis of low back disorders. Neur Networks 1990; 3: 583–591

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lippmann RP, Kukolich L, Shinlan D. Predicting the risk of complications in coronary bypass operations using neural networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 7, Tesauro G, Touretzky DS, Leen TK (eds), Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1995, pp 1055–1062

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tarassenko L, Whitehouse R, Gasparini G, Harris AL. Neural network prediction of relapse in breast cancer patients. Neur Comput Appl 1996; 4: 105–113

    Google Scholar 

  7. Burke HB, Rosen DB, Goodman PH. Comparing the prediction accuracy of artificial neural networks and other statistical models for breast cancer survival. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 7, Tesauro G, Touretzky DS, Leen TK (eds), Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1995; 1063–1067

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ravdin PM, Clark GM. A practical application of neural network analysis for predicting outcome of individual breast cancer patients. Breast Canc Res Trt 1992; 22: 285–293

    Google Scholar 

  9. Akaike H. Prediction and entropy. In A Celebration of Statistics. The ISI Centenary Volume, Atkinson AC, Fienberg SE (eds), New York, Springer-Verlag, 1985, pp 1–24

    Google Scholar 

  10. MathSoft, Inc. S-PLUS system for statistical analysis, based on the S language developed at the (then) AT&T's Bell Laboratories, (now) Lucent Technologies. Marketed by the Data Analysis Products division of MathSoft, Inc, 1996

  11. Venables WN, Ripley BD. Modern Applied Statistics with S-Plus. New York, Springer-Verlag, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ripley BD. S-Plus package multinom. Available at URL http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/S, 1994 [S-Plus code for multiple logistic regression]

  13. Gill PE, Murray W, Wright MH. Practical Optimization, London, Academic Press, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables (with discussion). J Roy Stat Soc B 1972; 34: 187–220

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fleiss JL. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. New York, Wiley, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dawid AP. Probability forecasting. In Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, vol 7, Kotz S, Johnson NL, Read CB (eds), 7: 210–218. New York, Wiley, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cleveland WS, Grosse E, Shyu WM. Local regression models. In Statistical Models in S, Chambers JM, Hastie TJ (eds), Pacific Grove, CA, Wadsworth and Brooks/Cole, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ripley BD. Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ripley RM. Neural network models for breast cancer prognosis. PhD thesis, University of Oxford, 1998 (Available at http://www.robots.ox.ac.uk/∼ruth)

  20. Gasparini G, Harris AL. Clinical importance of the determination of tumour angiogenesis in breast carcinoma: Much more than a new prognostic tool. J Clinical Oncology 1995; 13: 765–782

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tesauro G, Touretzky DS, Leen TK. (eds) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 7. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1995

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ripley, R.M., Harris, A.L. & Tarassenko, L. Neural network models for breast cancer prognosis. Neural Comput & Applic 7, 367–375 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01428127

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01428127

Keywords

Navigation