Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Maximum likelihood sequence estimation of differentially encoded PSK signals transmitted over Rayleigh frequency-flat fading channels

  • Technical Papers
  • Published:
International Journal of Wireless Information Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The problem of maximum likelihood (ML) detection of differentially encodedM-PSK signals on Rayleigh fading channels is investigated. It is shown that the solution to this problem can be easily related to previous results [1] and leads to the implementation of a receiver structure based on the Viterbi algorithm and employing per-survivor processing. The error rate performance of this receiver is evaluated by means of computer simulations for both coded and uncoded systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. M. Vitetta and D. P. Taylor, Maximum likelihood sequence estimation of uncoded and coded PSK signals transmitted over Rayleigh flat-fading channels,Conf. Rec. ICC'94, New Orleans, LA, pp. 1–7, 1994.

  2. J. G. Proakis,Digital Communications, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Divsalar and M. K. Simon, Multiple-symbol differential detection of MPSK,IEEE Transactions on Communications, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 300–308, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Wilsonet al., Multi-symbol detection of M-DPSK,Conf. Rec. GLOBECOM'89, Dallas, TX, pp. 1692–1697, 1989.

  5. F. Edbauer, Bit error rate of binary and quaternary DPSK signals with multiple differential feedback detection,IEEE Transactions on Communications, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 457–460, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. Leib and S. Pasupathy, The phase of a vector perturbed by Gaussian noise and differentially coherent receivers,IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, Vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 1491–1501, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  7. F. Adachi and M. Sawahashi, Viterbi decoding differential detection of DPSK,Electronics Letters, Vol. 28, No. 23, pp. 2196–2198, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Ho and D. Fung, Error performance of multiple-symbol differential detection of PSK signals transmitted over correlated Rayleigh fading channels,IEEE Transactions on Communications, Vol. 40, No. 10, pp. 1566–1569, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. Yu and P. Ho, Trellis Coded modulation with multiple symbol differential detection,Conf. Rec. ICC'93, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 1414–1418, 1993.

  10. C. W. Therrien,Discrete Random Signals and Statistical Signal Processing, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. V. Eyuboglu and S. U. H. Qureshi, Reduced-state sequence estimation with set partition and decision feedback,IEEE Transactions on Communications, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 13–20, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. R. Chevillat and E. Eleftheriou, Decoding of trellis-encoded signals in the presence of intersymbol interference and noise,IEEE Transactions on Communications, Vol. 37, No. 7, pp. 669–676, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Raheliet al., The principle of per-survivor processing: a general approach to approximate and adaptive MLSE,Conf. Rec. GLOBECOM'91, Phoenix, AZ, pp. 33.3.1–33.3.6, 1991.

  14. D. Divsalar and M. K. Simon, The performance of trellis coded multilevel DPSK on a fading mobile satellite channel,IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 78–91, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  15. F. Edbauer, Performance of interleaved trellis-coded differential 8-PSK modulation over fading channels,IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Vol. 7, No. 9, pp. 1340–1346, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. Leib and S. Pasupathy, Trellis-coded differentially coherent (TCDC) MPSK with carrier-phase-noise,IEEE Transactions on Communications, Vol. 39, No. 6, pp. 877–886, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. Makrakiset al., A sequential decoder for differential detection of trellis-coded PSK signals,Conf. Rec. ICC'88, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 1433–1438, 1988.

  18. D. Makrakis and P. T. Mathioupoulos, Optimal decoding in fading channels: a combined envelope, multiple differential and coherent detection approach,Conf. Rec. GLOBECOM'89, Dallas, TX, pp. 1551–1557, 1989.

  19. G. Ungerboeck, Channel coding with multilevel/phase signals,IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 55–67, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  20. G. H. Golub and C. F. Van Loan,Matrix Computations, 2nd ed., The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  21. W. C. Dam and D. P. Taylor, An adaptive maximum likelihood receiver for correlated Rayleigh fading channels,IEEE Transactions on Communications, Vol. 42, No. 9, pp. 2684–2692, September 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. H. Painter and S. C. Gupta, Recursive ideal observer detection of knownM-ary signals in multiplicative and additive Gaussian noise,IEEE Transactions on Communications, Vol. 21, No. 8, pp. 948–953, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vitetta, G.M., Taylor, D.P. Maximum likelihood sequence estimation of differentially encoded PSK signals transmitted over Rayleigh frequency-flat fading channels. Int J Wireless Inf Networks 2, 71–81 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01464457

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01464457

Key words