Skip to main content
Log in

A note on theΠ 02 -induction rule

  • Published:
Archive for Mathematical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is well-known (due to C. Parsons) that the extension of primitive recursive arithmeticPRA by first-order predicate logic and the rule ofΠ 02 -inductionΠ 02 -IR isΠ 02 -conservative overPRA. We show that this is no longer true in the presence of function quantifiers and quantifier-free choice for numbersAC 0,0-qf. More precisely we show that ℐ :=PRA 2 +Π 02 -IR+AC 0,0-qf proves the totality of the Ackermann function, wherePRA 2 is the extension ofPRA by number and function quantifiers andΠ 02 -IR may contain function parameters.

This is true even forPRA 2 + 01 -IR+Π 02 -IR +AC 0,0-qf, whereΠ 02 -IR is the restriction ofΠ 02 -IR without function parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Feferman, S.: Theories of finite type related to mathematical practise. In: Barwise, J. (ed.) Handbook of Mathematical Logic, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 913–972 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Feferman, S.: Hilbert's program relativized: proof-theoretical and foundational reductions. J. Symbolic Logic53, 364–384 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kohlenbach, U.: Constructions in classical analysis by unwinding proofs using majorizability (abstract from Logic Colloquium 89 Berlin). J. Symbolic Logic57, 307 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kohlenbach, U.: Effective bounds from ineffective proofs in analysis: an application of functional interpretation and majorization. J. Symbolic Logic57, 1239–1273 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kohlenbach, U.: Real growth in standard parts of analysis. Habilitationsschrift, pp. xv+166, Frankfurt (1995)

  6. Mints, G.E.: What can be done with PRA. J. Soviet Math.14, 1487–1492, 1980 [Translation from: Zapiski Nauchuyh Seminarov, LOMI, vol. 60, pp. 93–102 (1976)]

    Google Scholar 

  7. Parsons, C.: On a number theoretic choice schema and its relation to induction. In: Intuitionism and proof theory, pp. 459–473. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1970

    Google Scholar 

  8. Parsons, C.: On n-quantifier induction. J. Symbolic Logic37, 466–482 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sieg, W.: Fragments of arithmetic. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic28, 33–71 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I am grateful to an anonymous referee whose suggestions led to an improved discussion of our results

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kohlenbach, U. A note on theΠ 02 -induction rule. Arch Math Logic 34, 279–283 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01469385

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01469385

Subject classifications

Navigation