Abstract
Product optimization involves selecting design, manufacturing, and support attributes that can produce the best system. Producibility or manufacturability is the term often used to describe the relative ease of manufacturing a product. In complex systems, productibility optimization is a very difficult process, particularly when the values of many attributes are restricted by constraints. One challenge is to develop more universal producibility metrics for the conceptual design phase when design information is limited and drawings are nondimensional. This paper develops a new method for producibility optimization in conceptual design based on a combination of both decision theoretic and expert system techniques. Decision theoretic techniques provide the means to model the design for producibility problem in a manner that can deal with risk, uncertainty, and user (or corporate) preferences, and can effectively integrate diverse factors to provide a measure of the overall worth of a design. The particular decision theoretic approach employed is based on multi-attribute utility theory. An illustrative example of the methodology is applied to the conceptual design of a structural composite part.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arai, E. and Iwata, K. (1988) Product logic for an intelligent product modeling system.Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 4, 499–510.
Dlesk, D. C. and Liebman, J. S. (1983) Multiple objective engineering design.Engineering Optimization 6, 161–75.
Holtzman, S. (1989)Intelligent Decision Systems, Addison Wesley, Mass.
Keeney, R. L. (1982) Decision analysis: an overview.Operations Research 30, 803–38.
Keeney, R. L. and Raiffa, H. (1976)Decisions with Multiple objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.
Kim, S. H., Hom, S. and Perthasarathy, S. (1988) Design and manufacturing advisor for turbine disks.Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 4, 585–92.
Kirkwood, C. W. and van der Feltz, L. C. (1987) Personal computer programs for multi-objective decision analysis using power-additive utility functions.Technical Report DIS-87/88-1. Arizona State University.
Lopez, L. A., Elam, S. and Reed, K. (1989) Software concept for checking engineering designs for conformance with codes and standards.Engineering with Computers 5, 63–78.
Maddux, K. C. and Jain, S. C. (1986) CAE for the manufacturing engineer: the role of process simulation in concurrent engineering.Manufacturing Simulation and Processes, ASME,20, New York, 1–15.
Marvin, L. J. B. (1990) Intelligent decision support systems: assisting decision makers in multiple domains, Masters thesis, The University of Texas at Arlington.
Nevins, J. L. and Whitney, D. E. (eds) (1989)Concurrent Design of Products and Processes, McGraw-Hill Publishing Co., New York.
Priest, J. and Sanchez, J. (1990) An empirical methodology for measuring producibility early in product development.International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, in press.
Samson, D. (1988)Managerial Decision Analysis, Richard D. Irwin Inc., Illinois.
Tse, E. and Cralley, W. (1988) Management of Uncertainty in the Product Development Process, inProceedings of the Second Annual Conference on Design for Manufacturability, Florida.
Ulrich, K. and Seering, W. (1988) Computation and conceptual design.Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 4, 309–15.
Yoshimura, M., Itani, K. and Hitomi, K. (1988) Integrated optimization of machine product design and process design.International Journal of Production Research 27, 1241–56.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Burnell, L.J., Priest, J.W. & Briggs, K. An intelligent decision theoretic approach to producibility optimization in conceptual design. J Intell Manuf 2, 189–196 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01471365
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01471365