Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

CROSBY: Financial data interpretation as model-based diagnosis

  • Published:
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Analyzing the recent financial history of a firm is an important step in the annual audit cycle and in many other financial reasoning tasks. Auditors and other analysts performing this task have available to them a variety of mathematical models to fit to a set of historical and current period financial statement data. They also have expectations about the likelihoods and magnitudes of errors in that current period financial statement. Given these models and expectations, they must find the combination of models and statement errors that is most consistent with the numbers in the current period statement. A crucial difficulty in this task is in keeping track of the various models being tried and coping with the multiplicity of consistent combinations. This is a hard and general problem, and an important one in any uncertain environment in which human analysts must “juggle” many incompatible possibilities to arrive at a consistent view of the world. The program discussed in this paper prototypes a solution mechanism with potential to deal with this class of problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J.C. Bedard and S.F. Biggs, Processes of pattern recognition and hypothesis generation in analytical review, Working Paper, Department of Accounting, School of Business Administration, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06268 (September 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Davis and W.C. Hamscher, Model-based reasoning: Troubleshooting, in: H.E. Shrobe (ed.),Exploring Artificial Intelligence: Survey Talks from the National Conferences on Artificial Intelligence (Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, Calif., 1988) pp. 297–346. Also in: P.H. Winston and S.A. Shellard (eds.),Artificial Intelligence at MIT: Expanding Frontiers (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1990), Vol. 1, pp. 380–429, and in: W.C. Hamscher, J. de Kleer and L. Console (eds.),Readings in Model-based Diagnosis (Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1992) pp. 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. de Kleer and B.C. Williams, Diagnosis with behavioral model, in:Proc. 11th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, Detroit, MI, 1989, pp. 1324–1330. Also in: W.C. Hamscher, J. de Kleer and L. Console (eds.),Readings in Model-based Diagnosis (Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1992) pp. 124–130.

  4. V. Dhar, B. Lewis and J. Peters, A knowledge-based model of audit risk, AI Magazine 9(3) (1988) 57–63.

    Google Scholar 

  5. W.C. Hamscher, Business as a domain for model-based reasoning: A proposal to use explicit representation of the structure and behavior of business entities to assess audit risk, Technical Report 4, Price Waterhouse Technology Centre, Menlo Part, CA 94025 (May 1989). Also in:Working Notes of the Workshop on Model-based Reasoning, Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park, CA, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  6. W.C. Hamscher, Explaining unexpected financial results, Technical Report 11, Price Waterhouse Technology Centre, Menlo Park, CA 94025 (January 1990). Also in:Working Notes of the Spring Symposium on Automated Abduction (AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, 1990) pp. 96–100.

    Google Scholar 

  7. W.C. Hamscher, ACP: Reason maintenance and inference control for constraint propagation over intervals, in:Proc. 9th National Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, Anaheim, CA, July 1991, pp. 506–511. Also in: W.C. Hamscher, J. de Kleer and L. Console (eds.),Readings in Model-based Diagnosis (Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1992) pp. 212–217.

  8. W.C. Hamscher, L. Console and J. de Kleer (eds.),Readings in Model-based Diagnosis (Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  9. P.E. Hart, A. Barzilay and R.O. Duda, Qualitative reasoning for financial assessments: A prospectus, AI Magazine 7(1) (1986) 62–68.

    Google Scholar 

  10. E.A. Helfert,Techniques of Financial Analysis (Homewood, 1986).

  11. S. Kaufman, Report Finds Massive Fraud at MiniScribe, San Jose Mercury News (September 12, 1989) p. 4D.

  12. MiniScribe, Summary of Report of the Independent Evalution Committee of the Board of Directors of MiniScribe Corporation, Exhibit provided in 8-K Disclosure (September 12, 1989).

  13. P. Struss, Extensions to ATMS-based diagnosis, in: J.S. Gero (ed.),Artificial Intelligence in Engineering: Diagnosis and Learning (Elsevier and Computational Mechanics Publ. Amsterdam, and Boston, 1988) pp. 3–27. Also in: W.C. Hamscher, L. Console and J. de Kleer (eds.),Readings in Model-based Diagnosis (Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Zipser, How Pressure to Raise Sales Led MiniScribe to Falsify Numbers, Wall Street Journal (September 11, 1989). p. 1.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Price Waterhouse Technology Centre, 68 Willow Rd, 94025, Menlo Park, CA, USA

    Walter Hamscher

Authors
  1. Walter Hamscher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hamscher, W. CROSBY: Financial data interpretation as model-based diagnosis. Ann Math Artif Intell 11, 511–524 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01530757

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01530757

Keywords

Search

Navigation