Skip to main content
Log in

A recognition network model-based approach to dynamic image understanding

  • Published:
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we present definitions for a dynamic knowledge-based image understanding system. From a sequence of grey level images, the system produces a flow of image interpretations. We use a semantic network to represent the knowledge embodied in the system. Dynamic representation is achieved by ahypotheses network. This network is a graph in which nodes represent information and arcs relations. A control strategy performs a continuous update of this network. The originality of our work lies in the control strategy: it includes astructure tracking phase, using the representation structure obtained from previous images to reduce the computational complexity of understanding processes. We demonstrate that in our case the computational complexity, which is exponential if we only use a purely data-driven bottom-up scheme, is polynomial when using the hypotheses tracking mechanism. This is to say that gain improvement in computation time is a major reason for dynamic understanding. The proposed system is implemented; experimental results of road mark detection and tracking are given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. T. Binford, Survey of a model-based image analysis system, Int. J. Robotics 1(1982)587–633.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A.F. Bobick and R.C. Bolles, Representation space: An approach to the integration of visual information,Proc. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, San Diego, CA, 1989, pp. 492–499.

  3. R.M. Bolle, A. Califano and R. Kjeldsen, A complete and extendable approach to visual recognition, Pattern Anal. Machine Intellig. 14(1992)534–548.

    Google Scholar 

  4. E.D. Dickmanns and B.D. Mysliewietz, Recursive 3D road and relative ego-state recognition, Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intellig. 14(1992)199–213.

    Google Scholar 

  5. B.A. Draper, R.T. Collins, J. Brolio, A.R. Hanson and E.M. Riseman, The schema system, Int. J. Comp. Vision 2(1989)209–250.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.A. Feldman and D.H. Ballard, Connexionist models and their properties, Cognitive Sci. 6(1981) 205–254.

    Google Scholar 

  7. W.E. Crimson, The combinatoric of heuristic search termination for object recognition in cluttered environment, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intellig. 13(1991)920–935.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P.R. Cohen and E.H. Feigenbaum (eds.),The Handbook of Artificial Intelligence (Heuris Tech Press, Stanford, CA, 1987) pp. 181–189.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Horaud and F. Veillon, Finding geometric and relational structures in an image,Proc. Computer Vision ECCV 1990, France, 1990, pp. 374–384.

  10. F. Jurie, P. Rives, J. Gallice and J.L. Brame, High speed vehicle guidance based on vision,Proc. IFAC IAV, Southampton, England, 1993, pp. 205–210.

  11. J.W. Modestino and J. Zhang, A Markov random field model-based approach to image interpretation, IEEE Pattern Anal. Machine Intellig. 14(1992)606–615.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. Mohan and R. Nevatia, Segmentation and description based on perceptual organisation,Proc. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1989, pp. 333–341.

  13. R. Mohan and R. Nevatia, Perceptual organisation for scene segmentation and description, IEEE Pattern Anal. Machine Intellig. 14(1992)616–635.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Nagao and T. Matsuyama,A Structural Analysis of Complex Aerial Photographs (Plenum, New York, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Y. Ohta,Knowledge-based Interpretation of Outdoor Natural Color Scenes (Pitman, Boston, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  16. G. Reynolds and J.R. Beveridge, Search for geometric structures,Proc. Image Understanding Workshop Paper Advanced Research Project Agency, Los Angeles, 1987, pp. 257–271.

  17. D. Sabbah, Computing with connections in visual recognition of origami objects, Cognitive Sci. 9(1985)25–50.

    Google Scholar 

  18. T.M. Strat and M.A. Fischler, Context bases vision: Recognising objects from both 2D and 3D imagery, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intellig. 13(1991)1050–1065.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J.K. Tsotsos, Representational axes and temporal cooperative processes,Vision, Brain and Computation, eds. M.A. Arbib and A.A. Hanson (MIT Press, 1987) pp. 361–417.

  20. J.K. Tsotsos, On the relative complexity of active vs. passive visual search, Int. J. Comp. Vision 7(1992)127–141.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jurie, F., Gallice, J. A recognition network model-based approach to dynamic image understanding. Ann Math Artif Intell 13, 317–345 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01530834

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01530834

Keywords