Skip to main content
Log in

Directional differentiability of optimal solutions under Slater's condition

  • Published:
Mathematical Programming Submit manuscript

Abstract

For convex parametric optimization problems it is shown that the optimal solution is directionally differentiable provided that a strong second-order sufficient optimality condition and Slater's condition are satisfied for the unperturbed problem. This directional derivative is equal to the optimal solution of a certain quadratic programming problem. For the construction of this quadratic problem, a preliminary choice of a “suitable” KKT-multiplier is necessary, which under additional assumptions may be taken as a vertex of the set of KKT-multipliers of the unperturbed problem. In the last part of this paper, the contingent derivative of the optimal solution is investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J.-P. Aubin and I. Ekeland,Applied Nonlinear Analysis (Wiley, New York, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. Bank, J. Guddat, D. Klatte, B. Kummer and K. Tammer,Non-linear Parametric Optimization (Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J.F. Bonnans, “A semistrong sufficiency condition for optimality in non-convex programming and its connection to the perturbation problem,”Journal on Optimization Theory and Applications 60 (1989) 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. Collatz and W. Wetterling,Optimierungsaufgaben (Springer, Berlin, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  5. B. Cornet and J.-Ph. Vial, “Lipschitzian solutions of perturbed non-linear programming problems,”SIAM Journal on Control Optimization 24 (1986) 1123–1137.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Dempe, “On the directional derivative of the optimal solution mapping without linear independence constraint qualification,”Optimization 20 (1989) 401–414. [Corrigendum:ibid. 22 (1991) 417.]

    Google Scholar 

  7. V.F. Dem'yanov, C. Lemarechal and J. Zowe, “Approximation to a set—valued mapping I. A proposal,”Applied Mathematics on Optimization 14 (1986) 203–214.

    Google Scholar 

  8. V.F. Dem'yanov and A.M. Rubinov,Quasidifferential Calculus (Optimization Software, New York, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  9. M.E. Dyer and L.G. Proll, “An algorithm for determining all extreme points of a convex polytope,”Mathematical Programming 12 (1977) 81–96.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A.V. Fiacco,Introduction to Sensitivity and Stability Analysis in Non-linear Programming (Academic Press, New York, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Gauvin, “A necessary and sufficient regularity condition to have bounded multipliers in nonconvex programming,”Mathematical Programming 12 (1977) 136–139.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Gauvin and R. Janin, “Directional behavior of optimal solutions in nonlinear mathematical programming,”Mathematics of Operations Research 13 (1988) 629–649.

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. Gfrerer, J. Guddat and Hj. Wacker, “A globally convergent algorithm based on imbedding and parametric optimization,”Computing 30 (1983) 225–252.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Janin, “Directional derivative of the marginal function in nonlinear programming,”Mathematical Programming Study 21 (1984) 110–126.

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. Jittorntrum, “Solution point differentiability without strict complementarity in nonlinear programming,”Mathematical Programming Study 21 (1984) 127–138.

    Google Scholar 

  16. H.Th. Jongen, D. Klatte and K. Tammer, “Implicit functions and sensitivity of stationary points,”Mathematical Programming 41 (1990/91) 123–138.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A.J. King and R.T. Rockafellar, “Sensitivity analysis for nonsmooth generalized equations,”Mathematical Programming 55 (1992) 193–212

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Kojima, “Strongly stable stationary solutions in nonlinear programs”, in: S.M. Robinson, ed.,Analysis and Computation of Fixed Points (Academic Press, New York, 1980) pp. 93–138.

    Google Scholar 

  19. P. Malanowski, “Differentiability with respect to parameters of solutions to convex programming problems,”Mathematical Programming 33 (1985) 352–361.

    Google Scholar 

  20. O.L. Mangasarian and S. Fromowitz, “The Fritz John necessary optimality conditions in the presence of equality and inequality constraints,”Journal on Mathematical Analysis and Applications 17 (1967) 37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  21. S.M. Robinson, “Strongly regular generalized equations,”Mathematics of Operations Research 5 (1980) 43–62.

    Google Scholar 

  22. S.M. Robinson, “Generalized equations and their solutions, part II: Applications to nonlinear programming,”Mathematical Programming Study 19 (1982) 200–221.

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. Shapiro, “Second order sensitivity analysis and asymptotic theory of parametrized nonlinear programs,”Mathematical Programming 33 (1985) 280–299.

    Google Scholar 

  24. A. Shapiro, “Sensitivity analysis of nonlinear programs and differentiability properties of metric projections,”SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization 26 (1988) 628–645.

    Google Scholar 

  25. A. Shapiro, Private communication.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dempe, S. Directional differentiability of optimal solutions under Slater's condition. Mathematical Programming 59, 49–69 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01581237

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01581237

Key words