Skip to main content
Log in

Convex composite multi-objective nonsmooth programming

  • Published:
Mathematical Programming Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines nonsmooth constrained multi-objective optimization problems where the objective function and the constraints are compositions of convex functions, and locally Lipschitz and Gâteaux differentiable functions. Lagrangian necessary conditions, and new sufficient optimality conditions for efficient and properly efficient solutions are presented. Multi-objective duality results are given for convex composite problems which are not necessarily convex programming problems. Applications of the results to new and some special classes of nonlinear programming problems are discussed. A scalarization result and a characterization of the set of all properly efficient solutions for convex composite problems are also discussed under appropriate conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Ben-Tal and J. Zowe, “Necessary and sufficient optimality conditions for a class of nonsmooth minimization problems,”Mathematical Programming 24 (1982) 70–91.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.V. Burke, “Decent methods for composite nondifferentiable optimization,”Mathematical Programming 33 (1985) 260–279.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J.V. Burke, “Second order necessary and sufficient conditions for composite NDO,”Mathematical Programming 38 (1987) 287–302.

    Google Scholar 

  4. K.L. Chew and E.U. Choo, “Pseudolinearity and efficiency,”Mathematical Programming 28 (1984) 226–239.

    Google Scholar 

  5. E.U. Choo, “Proper efficiency and linear fractional vector maximum problem,”Operations Research 32 (1984) 216–220.

    Google Scholar 

  6. F.H. Clarke,Optimization and Nonsmooth Analysis (Wiley, New York, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  7. B.D. Craven,Mathematical Programming and Control Theory (Chapman and Hall, London, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Fletcher,Practical Methods of Optimization (Wiley, New York, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Fletcher, “A model algorithm for composite nondifferentiable optimization problems,”Mathematical Programming Study 17 (1982) 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A.M. Geoffrion, “Proper efficiency and the theory of vector maximization,”Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 22 (1968) 618–630.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M.A. Hanson, “On sufficiency of the Kuhn—Tucker conditions,”Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 80 (1981) 644–550

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. Hartley, “Vector and parametric programming,”Journal of Operations Research Society 36 (1985) 423–432.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A.D. Ioffe, “Necessary and sufficient conditions for a local minimum 2: conditions of Levitin—Milutin—Osmoloviskii type,”SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization 17 (1979) 251–265.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Jahn, “Scalarization in multi-objective optimization,”Mathematical Programming 29 (1984) 203–219.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Jahn and W. Krabs, “Applications of multicriteria optimization in approximation theory,” in: W. Stadler, ed.,Multicriteria Optimization in Engineering and in the Sciences (Plenum Press, New York, 1988) pp. 49–75.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Jahn and E. Sachs, “Generalized quasiconvex mappings and vector optimization,”SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization 24 (1986) 306–322.

    Google Scholar 

  17. V. Jeyakumar, “Compsosite nonsmooth programming with Gâteaux differentiability,”SIAM Journal on Optimization 1(1991) 30–41.

    Google Scholar 

  18. V. Jeyakumar, “On optimality conditions in nonsmooth inequality constrained minimization,”Numerical Functional Analysis and Optimization 9 (1987) 535–546.

    Google Scholar 

  19. V. Jeyakumar, “Convexlike alternative theorems and mathematical programming,”Optimization 16 (1985) 643–652.

    Google Scholar 

  20. V. Jeyakumar, “Infinite dimensional convex programming with applications to constrained approximation,”Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 75 (1992).

  21. V. Jeyakumar and H. Wolkowicz, “Zero duality gaps in infinite dimensional programming,”Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 67 (1990) 87–108.

    Google Scholar 

  22. D.T. Luc,Theory of Vector Optimization (Springer, Berlin, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  23. O.L. Mangasarian, “A simple characterization of solution sets of convex programs,”Operations Research Letters 7 (1988) 21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  24. R.R. Merkovsky and D.E. Ward, “Constraint qualifications in nondifferentiable programming,”Mathematical Programming 47 (1990) 389–405.

    Google Scholar 

  25. P. Michel and J.P. Penot, “Calcul sous-differentiel pour des fonctions lipschitziennes et non lipschitziennes,”Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences Paris 298 (1984) 269–272.

    Google Scholar 

  26. R.T. Rockafellar,Convex Analysis (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  27. R.T. Rockafellar, “First and second order epi-differentiability in nonlinear programming,”Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 307 (1988) 75–108.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Y. Sawaragi, H. Nakayama and T. Tanino,Theory of Multiobjective Optimization (Academic Press, New York, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  29. A. Schy and D.P. Giesy, “Multicriteria optimization techniques for design of aircraft control systems,” in: W. Stadler, ed.,Multicriteria Optimization in Engineering and in the Sciences (Plenum Press, New York, 1988) pp. 225–262.

    Google Scholar 

  30. W. Stadler,Multicriteria Optimization in Engineering and in the Sciences (Plenum Press, New York, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  31. W. Stadler, “Multicriteria optimization in mechanics: A survey,”Applied Mechanics Reviews 37 (1984) 277–286.

    Google Scholar 

  32. T. Weir and B. Mond, “Generalized convexity and duality in multiple objective programming,”Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society 39 (1989) 287–299.

    Google Scholar 

  33. D.J. White,Optimality and Efficiency (Wiley, New York, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  34. D.J. White, “Multi-objective programming and penalty functions,”Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 43 (1984) 583–599.

    Google Scholar 

  35. W.I. Zangwill,Nonlinear Programming (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was partially supported by the Australian Research Council grant A68930162.

This author wishes to acknowledge the financial support of the Australian Research Council.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jeyakumar, V., Yang, X.Q. Convex composite multi-objective nonsmooth programming. Mathematical Programming 59, 325–343 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01581251

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01581251

Key words

Navigation