Skip to main content
Log in

Near boundary behavior of primal—dual potential reduction algorithms for linear programming

  • Published:
Mathematical Programming Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is concerned with selection of theρ-parameter in the primal—dual potential reduction algorithm for linear programming. Chosen from [n +\(\sqrt n \), ∞), the level ofρ determines the relative importance placed on the centering vs. the Newton directions. Intuitively, it would seem that as the iterate drifts away from the central path towards the boundary of the positive orthant,ρ must be set close ton +\(\sqrt n \). This increases the relative importance of the centering direction and thus helps to ensure polynomial convergence. In this paper, we show that this is unnecessary. We find for any iterate thatρ can be sometimes chosen in a wide range [n +\(\sqrt n \), ∞) while still guaranteeing the currently best convergence rate of O(\(\sqrt n \) L) iterations. This finding is encouraging since in practice large values ofρ have resulted in fast convergence rates. Our finding partially complements the recent result of Zhang, Tapia and Dennis (1990) concerning the local convergence rate of the algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K.M. Anstreicher and R.A. Bosch, “Long steps in an O(n 3 L) algorithm for linear programming,”Mathematical Programming 54 (1992) 251–265.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R.M. Freund, “Polynomial-time algorithms for linear programming based only on primal scaling and projected gradients of a potential function,”Mathematical Programming 51 (1991) 203–222.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C.C. Gonzaga, “An algorithm for solving linear programming problems in O(n 3 L) operations,” in: N. Megiddo, ed.,Progress in Mathematical Programming-Interior Point and Related Methods (Springer, New York, 1989) pp. 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C.C. Gonzaga and M.J. Todd, “An O(\(\sqrt n \) L)-iteration large-step primal—dual affine algorithm for linear programming,” to appear inSIAM Journal on Optimization.

  5. C.-G. Han, P.M. Pardalos and Y. Ye, “Computational aspects of an interior point algorithm for quadratic programming problems with box constraints,” in: T.F. Coleman and Y. Li, eds.,Large-Scale Numerical Optimization (SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 1990) pp. 92–112.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Huang and K.O. Kortanek, “A simultaneous primal—dual potential reduction algorithm for linear programming,” to appear inOperations Research Letters.

  7. S. Huang and K.O. Kortanek, “A hybrid polynomial algorithm for linear programming,” Working Paper Series 89-25, Department of Management Sciences, The University of Iowa (Iowa City, IA, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  8. N. Karmarkar, “A new polynomial-time algorithm for linear programming,”Combinatorica 4 (1984) 373–395.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Kojima, N. Megiddo, T. Noma and A. Yoshise, “A unified approach to interior point algorithms for linear complementarity problems,” Presentation at theSecond Asilomar Workshop on Progress in Mathematical Programming (Asilomar, CA, 1990).

  10. M. Kojima, N. Megiddo and Y. Ye, “An interior point potential reduction algorithm for the linear complementarity problem,”Mathematical Programming 54 (1992) 267–279.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Kojima, S. Mizuno and A. Yoshise, “An O(\(\sqrt n \) L) iteration potential reduction algorithm for linear complementarity problems,”Mathematical Programming 50 (1991) 331–342.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Kojima, S. Mizuno and A. Yoshise, “A polynomial-time algorithm for a class of linear complementarity problems,”Mathematical Programming 44 (1989) 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Kojima, S. Mizuno and A. Yoshise, “A primal—dual interior point method for linear programming,” in: N. Megiddo, ed.,Progress in Mathematical Programming — Interior Point and Related Methods (Springer, New York, 1989) pp. 29–47.

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. Liu and D. Goldfarb, “Interior point potential function reduction algorithms for solving convex quadratic programs,” manuscript, Department of IEOR, Columbia University (New York, NY, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  15. K.A. McShane, C.L. Monma and D.F. Shanno, “An implementation of a primal—dual interior point method for linear programming,”ORSA JOurnal on Computing 1 (1989) 70–83.

    Google Scholar 

  16. N. Megiddo, “Pathways to the optimal set in linear programming,” in: N. Megiddo, ed.,Progress in Mathematical Programming — Interior Point and Related Methods (Springer, New York, 1989) pp. 131–158.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R.C. Monteiro and I. Adler, “An O(n 3 L) primal—dual interior point algorithm for linear programming,”Mathematical Programming 44 (1989) 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R.C. Monteiro, I. Adler and M.C. Resende, “A plynomial-time primal—dual affine scaling algorithm for linear and convex quadratic programming and its power series extension,”Mathematics of Operations Research 15 (1990) 191–214.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Renegar, “A polynomial-time algorithm, based on Newton's method, for linear programming,”Mathematical Programming 40 (1988) 59–93.

    Google Scholar 

  20. K. Tanabe, “Complementary-enforcing centered Newton method for mathematical programming,” in: K. Tone, ed.,New Methods for Linear Programming (The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Tokyo, 1987) pp. 118–144.

    Google Scholar 

  21. M.J. Todd and Y. Ye, “A centered projective algorithm for linear programming,”Mathematics of Operations Research 15 (1990) 508–529.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Y. Ye, “An O(n 3 L) potential reduction algorithm for linear programming,”Mathematical Programming 50 (1991) 239–258.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Y. Ye, “Line search in potential reduction algorithms for linear programming,” manuscript (1989).

  24. Y. Ye, “Bimatrix equilibrium points and potential functions, linear programming,” Working Paper Series 88-16, Department of Management Sciences, The University of Iowa (Iowa City, IA, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Y. Zhang, R.A. Tapia and J.E. Dennis, “On the superlinear and quadratic convergence of primal—dual interior point linear programming algorithms,” TR90-6, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Rice University (Houston, TX, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Research supported in part by NSF Grant DDM-8922636.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ye, Y., Kortanek, K.O., Kaliski, J. et al. Near boundary behavior of primal—dual potential reduction algorithms for linear programming. Mathematical Programming 58, 243–255 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01581269

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01581269

Key words

Navigation