Skip to main content
Log in

Constraint classification in mathematical programming

  • Published:
Mathematical Programming Submit manuscript

Abstract

Consider a set of algebraic inequality constraints defining either an empty or a nonempty feasible region. It is known that each constraint can be classified as either absolutely strongly redundant, relatively strongly redundant, absolutely weakly redundant, relatively weakly redundant, or necessary. We show that is is worth making a distinction between weakly necessary constraints and strongly necessary constraints. We also present afeasible set cover method which can detect both weakly and strongly necessary constraints.

The main interest in constraint classification is due to the advantages gained by the removal of redundant constraints. Since classification errors are likely to occur, we examine how the removal of a single constraint can affect the classification of the remaining constraints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H.C.P. Berbee, C.G.E. Boender, A.H.G. Rinnooy Kan, C.L. Scheffer, R.L. Smith and J. Telgen, “Hit-and-run algorithms for the identification of nonredundant linear inequalities,”Mathematical Programming 37 (1987) 184–207.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Boneh, “Identification of redundancy by a set covering equivalence,” in: J.P. Brans, ed.,Operational Research '84, Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Operational Research (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1984) pp. 404–422.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Boneh and A. Golan, “Constraints redundancy and feasible region boundedness by a random feasible point generator (RFPG),” contributed paper,EURO III, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, April 1979.

  4. R.J. Caron, J.F. McDonald and C.M. Ponic, “A degenerate extreme point strategy for the classification of linear constraints as redundant or necessary,”Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 62 (1989) 225–237.

    Google Scholar 

  5. V. Chvatal, “A greedy heuristic for the set-covering problem,”Mathematics of Operations Research 4 (1979) 233–235.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Gleeson and J. Ryan, “Identifying minimally infeasible subsystems of inequalities,”ORSA Journal on Computing 2 (1990) 61–64.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M.H. Karwan, V. Lotfi, J. Telgen and S. Zionts, eds.,Redundancy in Mathematical Programming (Springer, Berlin, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Telgen, “Redundancy and linear programs,” Ph.D. Thesis, Erasmus University (Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boneh, A., Boneh, S. & Caron, R.J. Constraint classification in mathematical programming. Mathematical Programming 61, 61–73 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01582139

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01582139

Key words

Navigation