Skip to main content
Log in

Computational aspects of cutting-plane algorithms for geometric programming problems

  • Published:
Mathematical Programming Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents the results of computational studies of the properties of cutting plane algorithms as applied to posynomial geometric programs. The four cutting planes studied represent the gradient method of Kelley and an extension to develop tangential cuts; the geometric inequality of Duffin and an extension to generate several cuts at each iteration. As a result of over 200 problem solutions, we will draw conclusions regarding the effectiveness of acceleration procedures, feasible and infeasible starting point, and the effect of the initial bounds on the variables. As a result of these experiments, certain cutting plane methods are seen to be attractive means of solving large scale geometric programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Avriel, R. Dembo and U. Passy, “Solution of generalized geometric programs”,International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 9 (1975) 149–168. Also presented by R. Dembo at the 41st TIMS Meeting, Houston, Texas (April 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Avriel and A.C. Williams, “Complementary geometric programming”,SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 19 (1970) 125–146.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P.A. Beck and J.G. Ecker, “Some computational experience with a modified convex simplex algorithm for geometric programs”, Report ADTC-12-20, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, 1972; andJournal of Optimization Theory and Application 15 (1975) 189–202.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Ben-Tal and A. Ben-Israel, “Primal geometric programs treated by linear programming”, Research Report CCS187, Center for Cybernetic Studies, University of Texas (July 1974).

  5. A. Charnes and W.W. Cooper,Management models and industrial application of linear programming, Volume I, II (Wiley, New York, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  6. E.W. Cheney and A.A. Goldstein, “Newton's method of convex programming and Tchebycheff approximation”,Numerische Mathematik 1 (1959) 253–268.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R.J. Clasen, “Using linear programming as a simplex subroutine”, Rand Corp. Memo P-3267, November 1965 (SHARE Distribution Agency No. 3884).

  8. J.J. Dinkel, W.H. Elliott and G.A. Kochenberger, “A linear programming approach to geometric programs”,Naval Research Logistics Quarterly (to appear).

  9. J.J. Dinkel, G.A. Kochenberger and B. McCarl, “An approach to numerical solutions of geometric programs”,Mathematical Programming 7 (1974) 181–190.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R.J. Duffin, “Linearizing geometric programs”,SIAM Review 12 (1970) 211–227.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R.J. Duffin, E.L. Peterson and C. Zener,Geometric programming — theory and applications (Wiley, New York, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  12. B.C. Eaves and W.I. Zangwill, “Generalized cutting plane algorithms”,SIAM Journal on Control 9 (1971) 529–542.

    Google Scholar 

  13. W.H. Elliott, “Primal geometric programs treated by sequential linear programming”, Ph.D. Thesis, The Pennsylvania State University (1976).

  14. J. Elzinga and T.G. Moore, “A central cutting plane algorithm for the convex programming problem”,Mathematical Programming 8 (1975) 134–145.

    Google Scholar 

  15. C.J. Frank, “An algorithm for geometric programming”, in: A. Lani and T.P. Vogl, eds.,Recent advances in optimization techniques (Wiley, New York, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  16. A.M. Geoffrion, “Elements of large-scale mathematical programming”,Management Science 16 (1970) 652–691.

    Google Scholar 

  17. H.O. Hartley and R.R. Hocking, “Convex programming by tangential approximation”,Management Science 9 (1963) 600–612.

    Google Scholar 

  18. D.M. Himmelblau,Applied nonlinear programming (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  19. J.E. Kelley, “The cutting plane method for solving convex programs”,SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 8 (1960) 703–712.

    Google Scholar 

  20. D.G. Luenberger,Introduction to linear and nonlinear programming (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  21. D.M. Topkis, “Cutting plane methods without nested constraint sets”,Operations Research 18 (1970) 404–413.

    Google Scholar 

  22. D.M. Topkis, “A note on cutting plane methods without nested constraint sets”,Operations Research 18 (1970) 1216–1220.

    Google Scholar 

  23. A.F. Veinott, “The supporting hyperplane method for unimodal programming”,Operations Research 15 (1967) 147–152.

    Google Scholar 

  24. P. Wolfe, “Accelerating the cutting plane method for nonlinear programming”,SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 9 (1961) 481–488.

    Google Scholar 

  25. W.I. Zangwell,Nonlinear programming: a unified approach (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  26. J.G. Ecker and M.J. Zoracki, “An easy primal method for geometric programming”,Management Science 23 (1976) 71–77.

    Google Scholar 

  27. M.J. Rijckaert and X.M. Martens, “A condensation method for generalized geometric programming”,Mathematical Programming 11 (1976) 89–93.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This author's research was supported in part by the Center for the Study of Environmental Policy, The Pennsylvania State University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dinkel, J.J., Elliott, W.H. & Kochenberger, G.A. Computational aspects of cutting-plane algorithms for geometric programming problems. Mathematical Programming 13, 200–220 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01584337

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01584337

Key words

Navigation