Abstract
In this paper we establish the efficiency estimates for two cutting plane methods based on the analytic barrier. We prove that the rate of convergence of the second method is optimal uniformly in the number of variables. We present a modification of the second method. In this modified version each test point satisfies an approximate centering condition. We also use the standard strategy for updating approximate Hessians of the logarithmic barrier function. We prove that the rate of convergence of the modified scheme remains optimal and demonstrate that the number of Newton steps in the auxiliary minimization processes is bounded by an absolute constant. We also show that the approximate Hessian strategy significantly improves the total arithmetical complexity of the method.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D.S. Atkinson and P.M. Vaidya, “A cutting plane algorithm for convex programming that uses analytic centers,”Mathematical Programming 69 (1) (1995) 1–43 (this issue).
J.L. Goffin, A. Haurie and J.P. Vial, “Decomposition and nondifferentiable optimization with the projective algorithm,”Management Science 38 (1992) 284–302.
N. Karmarkar, “A new polynomial-time algorithm for linear programming,”Combinatorica 4 (1984) 373–395.
C. Lemaréchal, “Nonsmooth optimization and descent methods,” Research Report 78-4, IIASA, Laxenburg, 1978.
C. Lemaréchal, A. Nemirovsky and Yu. Nesterov, “New variants of bundle methods,” Rapports de Recherche 1508, INRIA, 1991.
A. Levin, “An algorithm of minimization of convex functions,”Soviet Mathematics Doklady 160 (1965) 1244–1247.
A. Nemirovsky and D. Yudin,Problem Complexity and Method Efficiency in Optimization (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1983).
Yu. Nesterov and A. Nemirovsky,Interior-point Polynomial Algorithms in Convex Programming: Theory and Applications (SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 1994).
D.J. Newman, “Location of maximum on unimodal surfaces,”Journal of ACM 12 (1965) 395–398.
J. Renegar, “A polynomial-time algorithm, based on Newton's method for linear programming,”Mathematical Programming 40 (1988) 59–93.
N. Shor, “A cutting plane method for solving convex programming problem,”Cybernetics 1 (1977) 42–50.
G. Sonnevend, “New algorithm in convex programming based on a notion of “centre” (for a system of analytic inequalities) and on rational extrapolation,” in: K.H. Hoffman et al., eds.,Trends in Mathematical Optimization (Birkhäuser, Basel, 1988) 311–326.
S. Tarasov, L. Khachiyan and I. Erlich, “The method of inscribed ellipsoids,”Soviet Mathematics Doklady 298 (1988) 835–843.
P.M. Vaidya, “An algorithm for linear programming which requires O(((m+n)n 2+(m+n)1/5 n)L) arithmetic operations,”Mathematical Programming 47 (1990) 175–201.
P.M. Vaidya, “A new algorithm for minimizing convex functions over convex sets,”Mathematical Programming, to appear.
Y. Ye, “A potential reduction algorithm allowing column generation,”SIAM Journal of Optimization 2 (1992) 7–20.
D. Yudin and A. Nemirovsky, “Informational complexity and efficient methods for solving convex extremal problems,”Ekonomika i Matem. Metody 12 (1976) 357–369.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nesterov, Y. Complexity estimates of some cutting plane methods based on the analytic barrier. Mathematical Programming 69, 149–176 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01585556
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01585556