Skip to main content
Log in

An additive bounding procedure for the asymmetric travelling salesman problem

  • Published:
Mathematical Programming Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, new lower bounds for the asymmetric travelling salesman problem are presented, based on spanning arborescences. The new bounds are combined in an additive procedure whose theoretical performance is compared with that of the Balas and Christofides procedure (1981). Both procedures have been imbedded in a simple branch and bound algorithm and experimentally evaluated on hard test problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • E. Balas and N. Christofides, “A restricted Lagrangean approach to the traveling salesman problem,”Mathematical Programming 21 (1981) 19–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Balas and P. Toth, “Branch and bound methods,” in: E.L. Lawler, J.K. Lenstra, A.H.G. Rinnooy Kan and D.B. Shmoys, eds.,The Traveling Salesman Problem: A Guided Tour of Combinatorial Optimization (Wiley, New York, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Bellmore and J.C. Malone, “Pathology of traveling salesman subtour elimination algorithms,”Operations Research 19 (1971) 278–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • P.M. Camerini, L. Fratta and F. Maffioli, “A note on finding optimum branchings,”Networks 9 (1979) 309–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • P.M. Camerini, L. Fratta and F. Maffioli, “Thek best spanning arborescences of a network,”Networks 10 (1980) 91–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Carpaneto, M. Dell'Amico, M. Fischetti and P. Toth, “A branch and bound algorithm for the multiple depot vehicle scheduling problem,”Networks 19 (1989) 531–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Carpaneto, M. Fischetti and P. Toth, “New lower bounds for the symmetric travelling salesman problem,”Mathematical Programming (Series B) 45 (1989) 233–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Carpaneto, S. Martello and P. Toth, “Algorithms and codes for the assignment problem,”Annals of Operations Research 7 (1988).

  • G. Carpaneto and P. Toth, “Some new branching and bounding criteria for the asymmetric travelling salesman problem,”Management Science 26 (1980) 736–743.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Christofides, “Bounds for the traveling salesman problem,”Operations Research 20 (1972) 1044–1056.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Edmonds, “Optimum branchings,”Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards-B. Mathematics and Mathematical Physics 71B (1967) 233–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Fischetti and P. Toth, “An efficient algorithm for the min-sum arborescence problem,” Technical Report OR/87/6, DEIS, University of Bologna (Bolonga, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Fischetti and P. Toth, “An additive approach for the optimal solution of the prize-collecting travelling salesman problem,” in: B.L. Golden and A.A. Assad, eds.,Vehicle Routing: Methods and Studies (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Fischetti and P. Toth, “An additive bounding procedure for combinatorial optimization problems,”Operations Research 37 (1989) 319–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • D.R. Fulkerson, “Packing rooted directed cuts in a weighted directed graph,”Mathematical Programming 6 (1974) 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Grötschel and M.W. Padberg, “Polyhedral theory,” in: E.L. Lawler, J.K. Lenstra, A.H.G. Rinnooy Kan and D.B. Shmoys, eds.,The Traveling Salesman Problem: A Guided Tour of Combinatorial Optimization (Wiley, New York, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Held and R.M. Karp, “The traveling-salesman problem and minimum spanning tress: Part II,”Mathematical Programming 1 (1971) 6–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • G.A.P. Kindervater, A. Volgenant, G. de Leve and V. van Gijlswijk, “On dual solutions of the linear assignment problem,”European Journal of Operational Research 19 (1985) 76–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • P.D. Krolak, W. Felts and G. Marble, “A man-machine approach toward solving the traveling salesman problem,”Communications of the Association on Computing Machinery 14 (1971) 327–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • E.L. Lawler,Combinatorial Optimization: Networks and Matroids (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • E.L. Lawler, J.K. Lenstra, A.H.G. Rinnooy Kan and D.B. Shmoys,The Traveling Salesman Problem: A Guided Tour of Combinatorial Optimization (Wiley, New York, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • M.W. Padberg and M. Grötschel, “Polyhedral computations,” in: E.L. Lawler, J.K. Lenstra, A.H.G. Rinnooy Kan and D.B. Shmoys, eds.,The Traveling Salesman Problem: A Guided Tour of Combinatorial Optimization (Wiley, New York, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Rinaldi and L.A. Yarrow, “Optimizing a 48-city traveling salesman problem: A case study in combinatorial problem solving,” Preprint R. 122, IASI-CNR (Rome, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • T.H.C. Smith, V. Srinivasan and G.L. Thompson, “Computational performance of three subtour elimination algorithms for solving asymmetric traveling salesman problems,”Annals of Discrete Mathematics 1 (1977) 479–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.E. Tarjan, “Depth-first search and linear algorithms,”SIAM Journal on Computing 1 (1972) 146–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.E. Tarjan, “Finding optimum branchings,”Networks 7 (1977) 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fischetti, M., Toth, P. An additive bounding procedure for the asymmetric travelling salesman problem. Mathematical Programming 53, 173–197 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01585701

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01585701

Key words

Navigation