Skip to main content
Log in

On optimizing functions which are defined in part by an approximation process

  • Published:
Mathematical Programming Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies an optimization problem in which the objective function can not be completely given in closed form. In particular, we assume that some part of the objective function must be computed by an approximation process. This paper develops a technique for solving a class of such problems. Examples demonstrating the technique and problem areas in which it has been successfully applied are also given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G.L. Curry, R.W. Skeith and R.G. Harper, “A multi-product dependent inventory model”,AIIE Transactions II(3) (1970) 263–267.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D.J. Hartfiel and G.L. Curry, “An algorithm for optimal inventory policies for systems with joint setup costs”,Management Science 20 (1974) 1175–1177.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D.J. Hartfiel and G.L. Curry, “On optimizing certain nonlinear convex functions which are partially defined by a simulation process”Mathematical Programming 13 (1977) 88–93.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Edward A. Silver, “Some findings relative to a joint replenishment inventory control strategy”, Working Paper #55, Dept. of Management Sciences, University of Waterloo, Ontario (June, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  5. D.M. Simmons, “Optimal inventory policies under a hierarchy of setup costs”,Management Science 18 (1972) 291–299.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hartfiel, D.J., Curry, G.L. On optimizing functions which are defined in part by an approximation process. Mathematical Programming 20, 63–80 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01589333

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01589333

Key words

Navigation