Abstract
A variety of IP problems in location, logical design, and project selection contain collections of constraints of the form
or more generally
where all coefficients are nonnegative, and the setsS j ,j∈J i , are pairwise disjoint. We show how to solve the associated LP problem for these and other related structures (simultaneously including upper bound restrictions) while keeping the tableau the same size as if such constraints were absent. Our procedure not only reduces the effective size of such problems, but bypasses many of the calculations ordinarily required by the simplex method.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
G.B. Dantzig,Linear programming and extensions (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1963) chs. 22 and 24.
G.B. Dantzig and R.M van Slyke, “Generalized upper bounding techniques”,Journal of Computer and Systems Sciences 1 (1967) 213–226.
A.M. Geoffrion and R.D. McBride, “The capacitated facility location problem with additional constraints”, paper presented to the Joint National Meeting of AIIE, ORSA, and TIMS, Atlantic City, November 8–10, 1972.
Fred Glover, “Management decision and integer programming”,The Accounting Review (1969).
Fred Glover, “Reducing the size of some IP formulations by substitution”,Operational Research Quarterly 26 (2) (1975).
J. Hartman, and J.S. Lasdon, “A generalized upper bounding method for doubly coupled linear programs”,Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 17 (4) (1970) 411–429.
L.S. Lasdon,Optimization theory for large systems, (Macmillan, New York, 1970).
Linus Schrage, “Implicit representation of variable upper bounds in linear programming”, Rept. 7437, Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, (August 1974) (to appear inMathematical Programming).
H.P. Williams, “Experiments in the formulation of integer programming problems”,Mathematical Programming Study (2)(1974) 180–197.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Glover, F. Compact LP bases for a class of IP problems. Mathematical Programming 12, 102–109 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01593773
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01593773