Skip to main content
Log in

Bounded query classes and the difference hierarchy

  • Published:
Archive for Mathematical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

LetA be any nonrecursive set. We define a hierarchy of sets (and a corresponding hierarchy of degrees) that are reducible toA based on bounding the number of queries toA that an oracle machine can make. WhenA is the halting problemK our hierarchy of sets interleaves with the difference hierarchy on the r.e. sets in a logarithmic way; this follows from a tradeoff between the number of parallel queries and the number of serial queries needed to compute a function with oracleK.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amir, A., Beigel, R., Gasarch, W.I.: Cheatable P-Terse, and P-Superterse Sets. Tech. Rep. 2090, Dep. Comput. Sci., Univ. Md., 1988

  2. Addison, J.W.: The method of alternating chains. In: Theory of models, pp. 1–16. Amsterdam: North-Holland 1965

    Google Scholar 

  3. Amir, A., Gasarch, W.I.: Polynomial terse sets. Inf. Comput.77:37–56 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beigel, R.: Bi-immunity results for cheatable sets. Theor. Comput. Sci. (to appear)

  5. Beigel, R.: Bounded queries to SAT and the boolean hierarchy. Theor. Comput. Sci. (to appear)

  6. Beigel, R.: Query-limited reducibilities. PhD thesis, Stanford University, 1987

  7. Beigel, R.: NP-hard sets are P-superterse unless R=NP. Tech. Rep. 4, Dep. Comput. Sci., The Johns Hopkins University, 1988

  8. Beigel, R.: When arek+1 queries better thank? Tech. Rep. 6, Dep. Comput. Sci., The Johns Hopkins University, 1988

  9. Beigel, R., Gasarch, W.I., Gill, J.T., Owings, J.C., Jr.: Terse, superterse, and verbose sets. Tech. Rep. 1806, Dep. Comput. Sci., Univ. Md., 1987

  10. Buss, S.R., Hay, L.E.: On truth table reducibility to SAT and the difference hierarchy over NP. In: Proc. 3rd Annu. Conf. Structure in Complexity Theory, pp. 224–233. IEEE Computer Society Press, June 1988

  11. Cai, J., Gundermann, T., Hartmanis, J., Hemachandra, L.A., Sewelson, V., Wagner, K.W., Wechsung, G.: The Boolean hierarchy I: structural properties. SIAM J. Comput.17:1232–1252 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cooper, S.B.: Degrees of unsolvability. PhD thesis, Leicester University, 1971

  13. Cooper, S.B.: Enumeration reducibility using bounded information: counting minimal covers. Z. Math. Logik Grundlagen Math.,33:537–560 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Epstein, R.L., Haas, R., Kramer, R.L.: Hierarchies of sets and degrees below 0′. In: Logic Year 1979–80. (Lect. Notes Math., vol. 859, pp. 32–48) Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer 1981

    Google Scholar 

  15. Epstein, R.L.: Degrees of unsolvability: structure and theory. (Lect. Notes Math., vol. 759) Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer 1979

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ershov, Y.L.: A hierarchy of sets, I. Algebra i logika,7:47–74 (1968) (English translation, Consultants Bureau, NY, pp. 25–43)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gold, E.M.: Limiting recursion. J. Symb. Logic30:28–48 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hay, L.: Convex subsets of 2n and bounded truth-table reducibility. Discrete Math.21:31–46 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Köbler, J., Schöning, U., Wagner, K.W.: The difference and truth-table hierarchies for NP. RAIRO Theor. Inf. Appl.21:419–435 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lachlan, A.H.: Some notions of reducibility and productiveness. Z. Math. Logik Grundlagen Math.,11:17–44 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Polyakov, E.A., Rozinas, M.G.: Enumeration reducibilities. Sib. Math. J.18, 594–599 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Poljakov, E.A., Rozinas, M.G.: Relationships between different forms of relative computability. Math. USSR, Sb.,35:425–436 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Putnam, H.: Trial and error predicates and the solution to a problem of Mostowski. J. Symb. Logic,30:49–57 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rogers, H., Jr.: Theory of recursive functions and effective computability. New York: McGraw Hill 1967

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wagner, K.W.: Bound query computations. In: Proc. 3rd Annu. Conf. Structure in Complexity Theory, pp. 260–277. IEEE Computer Society Press, June 1988

  26. Wechsung, G., Wagner, K.: On the Boolean closure of NP. In: Proc. 1985 Int. Conf. Fundamentals of Computation Theory. (Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., vol. 199, pp. 485–493) Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo: Springer 1985

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported in part by NSF grant CCR-8808949. Part of this work was completed while this author was a student at Stanford University supported by fellowships from the National Science Foundation and from the Fannie and John Hertz Foundation

Supported in part by NSF grant CCR-8803641

Part of this work was completed while this author was on sabbatical leave at the University of California, Berkeley

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beigel, R., Gasarch, W.I. & Hay, L. Bounded query classes and the difference hierarchy. Arch Math Logic 29, 69–84 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01620618

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01620618

Keywords

Navigation