Skip to main content
Log in

Proof-theoretic analysis of KPM

  • Published:
Archive for Mathematical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

KPM is a subsystem of set theory designed to formalize a recursively Mahlo universe of sets. In this paper we show that a certain ordinal notation system is sufficient to measure the proof-theoretic strength ofKPM. This involves a detour through an infinitary calculus RS(M), for which we prove several cutelimination theorems. Full cut-elimination is available for derivations of\(\Sigma (L_{\omega _1^c } )\) sentences, whereω c1 denotes the least nonrecursive ordinal. This paper is self-contained, at least from a technical point of view.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barwise, J.: Admissible sets and structures. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer 1975

    Google Scholar 

  2. Buchholz, W.: Ein Mengensystem ohne Kollabierungsfunktionen. Oberseminarvortrag, München 1984

    Google Scholar 

  3. Buchholz, W.: A new system of proof-theoretic ordinal functions. Arch. Math. Logik Grundlagenforsch.32, 195–207 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buchholz, W., Schütte, K.: Proof theory of impredicative subsystems of analysis. Naples: Bibliopolis 1988

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harrington, L.: The superjump and the first recursively Mahlo ordinal. In: Gandy, R.O., Yates, C.E.M. (eds.) Logic Colloquium '69, pp. 43–52. Amsterdam: North-Holland 1971

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jäger, G.:ϱ-inaccessible ordinals, collapsing functions and a recursive notation system. Arch. Math. Logik Grundlagenforsch.24, 49–62 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jäger, G.: Theories for admissible sets: a unifying approach to proof theory. Naples: Bibliopolis 1986

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jäger, G., Pohlers, W.: Eine beweistheoretische Untersuchung von (Δ1/2−CA)+(BI) und verwandter Systems. Sitzungsberichte der Bayerischen Akad. der Wissenschaften, Mathem.— Naturwiss. Klasse (1982), pp. 1–28

  9. Pohlers, W.: Ordinal notations based on a hierarchy of inaccessible cardinals. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic33, 157–179 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pohlers, W.: Proof Theory: an introduction. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer 1989

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pohlers, W.: Proof theory and ordinal analysis. (to appear)

  12. Rathjen, M.: Untersuchungen zu Teilsystemen der Zahlentheorie zweiter Stufe und der Mengenlehre mit einer zwischenΔ1/2−CA undA−CA+BI liegenden Beweisstärke. Dissertation Münster (1988)

  13. Rathjen, M.: Ordinal notations based on a weakly mahlo cardinal. Arch. Math. Logic29, 249–263 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rathjen, M.: Provable wellorderings ofKPM. (in preparation)

  15. Richter, W.H.: Recursively Mahlo ordinals and inductive definitions. In: Gandy, R.O., Yates, C.E.M.: Logic Colloquium '69, pp. 273–288. Amsterdam: North-Holland 1971

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schütte, K.: Proof theory. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  17. Simpson, S.G.: Nichtbeweisbarkeit von gewissen kombinatorischen Eigenschaften endlicher Bäume. Arch. Math. Logik Grundlagenforsch.25, 45–65 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Smorynski, C.: The incompleteness theorems. In: Barwise, J.: Handbook of mathematical logic, pp. 821–866. Amsterdam: North-Holland 1977

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dedicated to Kurt Schütte on the occasion of his 80th birthday

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rathjen, M. Proof-theoretic analysis of KPM. Arch Math Logic 30, 377–403 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01621475

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01621475

Keywords

Navigation