Skip to main content
Log in

Future in biomolecular computation

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Large-scale computations for biomolecules are dominated by three levels of theory: rigorous quantum mechanical calculations for molecules with up to about 30 atoms, semi-empirical quantum mechanical calculations for systems with up to several hundred atoms, and force-field molecular dynamics studies of biomacromolecules with 10,000 atoms and more including surrounding solvent molecules. It can be anticipated that increased computational power will allow the treatment of larger systems of ever growing complexity. Due to the scaling of the computational requirements with increasing number of atoms, the force-field approaches will benefit the most from increased computational power. On the other hand, progress in methodologies such as density functional theory will enable us to treat larger systems on a fully quantum mechanical level and a combination of molecular dynamics and quantum mechanics can be envisioned. One of the greatest challenges in biomolecular computation is the protein folding problem. It is unclear at this point, if an approach with current methodologies will lead to a satisfactory answer or if unconventional, new approaches will be necessary. In any event, due to the complexity of biomolecular systems, a hierarchy of approaches will have to be established and used in order to capture the wide ranges of length-scales and time-scales involved in biological processes. In terms of hardware development, speed and power of computers will increase while the price/performance ratio will become more and more favorable. Parallelism can be anticipated to become an integral architectural feature in a range of computers. It is unclear at this point, how fast massively parallel systems will become easy enough to use so that new methodological developments can be pursued on such computers. Current trends show that distributed processing such as the combination of convenient graphics workstations and powerful general-purpose supercomputers will lead to a new style of computing in which the calculations are monitored and manipulated as they proceed. The combination of a numeric approach with artificial-intelligence approaches can be expected to open up entirely new possibilities. Ultimately, the most exciding aspect of the future in biomolecular computing will be the unexpected discoveries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Almhof, J. and Luthi, H.P., In Jensen, K.F. and Truhlar D.G., (Eds.) Supercomputer Research in Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, ACS Symposium Series 353, American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C., 1987, p. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Recently (Cray Research Inc. press release November 18, 1987), Seymour Cray projected the performance of his CRAY-4, which is now in its initial planning stage, to be 1000 times that of the CRAY-1 delivered in 1976. If we assume a typical development cycle of 5 years, a factor of 1000 in throughput performance would have then been achieved within about two decades.

  3. Hohenberg, P. and Kohn, W., Phys. Rev. B 136 (1964) 864–871.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kohn, W. and Sham, L.J., Phys. Rev. A, 140 (1965) 1133–1138.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wimmer, E., Freeman, A.J., Fu, C.-L., Cao, P.-L., Chou, S.-H. and Delley, B., In Jensen, K.F. and Truhlar, D.G. (Eds.) Supercomputer Research in Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, ACS Symposium Series 353, American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C., 1987, p. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  6. McCammon, J.A. and Harvey, S.C., Dynamics of Proteins and Nucleic Acids, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987 (and references therein).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wipke, W.T. and Hahn, M.A., Pierce T.H. and Hohne, B.A. (Eds.) Artificial Intelligence Applications in Chemistry. ACS Symposium Series 306, American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C., 1986, p. 136.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Klein, T.E., Huang, C., Ferrin, T.E., Langridge, R. and Hansch, C., ibid., p. 147.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Singh, U.C., QUEST 1.0 Users Manual, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Car, R. and Parrinello, M., Phys. Rev. Lett., 55 (1985) 2471–2474.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Allan, D.C. and Teter, M.P., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 (1987) 1136–1139.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Amdahl, G., American Federation of Information Processing Society Conference Proceedings, Spring Joint Computer Conference 3 (1967) 483.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wilson, K.G., In Matsen F.A. and Tajima, T. (Eds.) Supercomputers — Algorithms, Architectures, and Scientific Computing, University of Texas Press, Austin, 1986, p. 431.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wimmer, E. Future in biomolecular computation. J Computer-Aided Mol Des 1, 283–290 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01677277

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01677277

Key words

Navigation