Abstract
We define a languageL and show that its time and space complexitiesT andS must satisfyT 2 S ≥cn 3 even allowing machines with multiple (non random) access to the input.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. Cobham, The recognition problem for perfect squares,Proceedings 7th IEEE Symposium on SWAT, Berkeley, Calif., October 1966, 78–87.
A. B. Borodin, M. J. Fischer, D. G. Kirkpatrick, N. A. Lynch, and M. Tompa, A time-space tradeoff for sorting on non-oblivious machines.Proceedings 20th IEEE Symposium on FOCS, San Juan, Puerto Rico, October 1979, 319–327.
A. B. Borodin and S. A. Cook, A time-space tradeoff for sorting on a general sequential model of computation,Proceedings 12th ACM, STOC., Los Angeles, Calif., April 1980, 294–301.
Z. Galil and J. Seiferas, Time-space-optimal string matching,J. Computer Sys. Sciences 26 (1983), 280–294.
R. L. Rivest and A. C. C. Yao,k+1 heads are better thank, JACM 25, 2(1978), 337–340.
L. Janiga, Real-time computations of two-way multihead finite automata, inFundamentals of Computation Theory (FCT 79) (L. Budach ed.), Akademic Verlag, Berlin, 214–219.
P. Dúriś and Z. Galil, Fooling a two way automaton or One pushdown store is better than one counter for two way machines,Theoretical Computer Science 21 (1982), 39–53.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The second author was supported in part by the Israel Commission for Basic Research.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dúriś, P., Galil, Z. A time-space tradeoff for language recognition. Math. Systems Theory 17, 3–12 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01744430
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01744430