Skip to main content
Log in

A model for pattern perception with musical applications part II: The information content of pitch structures

  • Published:
Mathematical systems theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This is the second paper of a series which begins by treating the perception of pitch relations in musical contexts and the perception of timbre and speech. The first paper discusses in some detail those properties of musical scales required in order for them to function as “reference frames” which provide for the “measurement” of intervals such that ([1], p. 270),Every melodic phrase, every chord, which can be executed at any pitch, can be also executed at any other pitch in such a way that we immediately perceive the characteristic marks of their similarity. Here we continue this discussion by developing quantitative measures of the degree to which different scales possess the above properties. Then that property of musical scales which permits a listener to code the pitches of which it is constituted into “degrees” is examined and a corresponding quantitative measure developed. Musical scales are shown to be optimal choices with respect to both the former and latter measures, and a theory limiting those scales which are musically useful to a small fraction of possible sets of pitches is proposed. Existing scales which have been examined fall within the theory, which links the techniques of composition which may be used (i.e., those which produce perceptible relations between musical segments) to the above properties of the scale structures. This paper is not self-contained—reading of the previous paper in this series is required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. L. F. Helmholtz,On the Sensations of Tone as a Physiological Basis for the Theory of Music, (translated by Alexander J. Ellis, 1885) Peter Smith, New York, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Boomsliter andW. Creel, The long pattern hypothesis in harmony and hearing,J. Music Theory, 19615, 2–31.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. C. R. Licklider, Three Auditory Theoreies, In: S. Koch (Ed.)Psychology: a study of a science, 41–144, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Kunst,Music in Java, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mantle Hood,The Nuclear Theme as a Determinant of Patet in Javanese Music. J. B. Wolters—Groningen, Djakarta, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mantle Hood, Slendro and Pelog Redefined,Selected Reports, Institute of Ethnomusicology, U.C.L.A. 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Rothenberg,A mathematical model for the perception of redundancy and stability in musical scales. Paper read at Acoustical Society of America, New York, May 1963. Also: Technical Reports to Air Force Office of Scientific Research 1963–1969 (Grants and Contracts AF-AFOSR 881-65, AF 49(638)-1738 and AF-AFOSR 68-1596).

  8. G. M. Stratton, Vision without inversion of the retinal image,Psych. Rev. 4 (1897), 341–60 and 463–81.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. H. Thouless, Phenonmenal regression to the real object,Brit. Jour. Psychol. 21 (1931), 339–59.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. von Senden,Raum-und Gestaltauffassung beioperierten Blindgeborenen vor und nach der Operation. Barth, Leipzig, 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Carrol C. Pratt, Comparison of tonal distance, also: Bisection of tonal intervals larger than an octave,Jour. of Experimental Psychol. 11 (1928), 77–87 and 17–36.

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. Munsterburg, Vergleichen der Tondistanzen,Beitrage zur Experimentelle Psychology,4 (1892), 147–177.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Poincaré,The Value of Science, Dover Publications, New York, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  14. P. Hindemith,The Craft of Musical Composition, Associated Music Publishers, New York, 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Olivier Messiaen,Technique de mon Langage Musical, Alphonse Leduc, Paris, 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. F. Schouten, R. J. Ritsma, andB. Lopez, Cardozo, Pitch of the Residue,Jour. of the Acoustical Society of America,34 (1962), 1418–1424.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. E. Evetts, The Subjective Pitch of a Complex Inharmonic Residue, unpublished report, Pembroke College, England, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported in part by grants and contracts AF-AFOSR 881-65, AF 49(638)-1738 and AF-AFOSR 68-1596.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rothenberg, D. A model for pattern perception with musical applications part II: The information content of pitch structures. Math. Systems Theory 11, 353–372 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01768486

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01768486

Keywords

Navigation