Skip to main content
Log in

New words from old: A formalism for word-formation

  • Published:
Computers and the Humanities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many languages make use of word-formation devices to allow speakers or writers to create new words when the existing vocabulary proves inadequate. In this paper we consider how these devices can be expressed formally, allowing them to be used in word- and sentence-generation, for dictionary expansion, and the like. The paper begins with some typical word-formation rules drawn mostly from French. Attention is drawn to some features of these rules which must be captured in any formal representation. The formal representation of a basic lexical transformation is presented in some detail, along with a number of examples. A computer implementation of the transformation system is described, together with a range of applications. A discussion of static and dynamic generation leads to the concept of an inverted transformation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aho, Alfred H., Brian Kernighan and P. J. Weinberger.The AWK Programming Language. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anshen, Frank and Mark Aronoff. “Producing Morphologically Complex Words”.Linguistics, 26 (1988), 641–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronoff, Mark.Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baayen, Harald and Rochelle Lieber. “Productivity and English Derivation: A Corpus-based Study”.Linguistics, 29 (1991), 801–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins.COBUILD English Language Dictionary. London: Collins, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, Danielle.Morphologie dérivationnelle et structuration du lexique. Tuebingen: Niemeyer, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, Jean.Etude sur la dérivation suffixale enfrançais moderne et contemporain: essai d'interprétation des mouvements observés dans le domaine de la morphologie des mots construits. Paris: Librairie Larousse, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabb, Nigel. “English Suffixation is Constrained Only by Selectional Restrictions”.Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 6 (1988), 527–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilbert, Louis.La formation du vocabulaire de l'aviation. Paris: Larousse, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, Michael. “CompLex: A Tool for the Development of L2 Vocabulary Knowledge”.Proceedings of the SCIAL (Science cognitives, informatique et apprentissage des langues). Clermont-Ferrand, France: Université Blaise-Pascal, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ide, Nancy and Jean Véronis. “Refining Taxonomies Extracted from Machine-Readable Dictionaries”.The New Medium. 17th International Conference of the ALLC. Siegen: Universität-Gesamthochschule, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, Ray. “Morphological and Semantic Regularities in the Lexicon”.Language, 51 (1975), 639–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langendoen, Terence. “The Generative Capacity of Word-Formation Components”.Linguistic Inquiry, 12 (1981), 320–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levison, Michael and Greg Lessard. “A System for Natural Language Generation”.Computers and the Humanities, 26 (1992), 43–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levison, Michael and Greg Lessard. “Experiments in Word Creation”.ACH/ALLC 1995 Joint International Conference. Santa Barbara: University of California, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieber, Rochelle.Deconstructing Morphology: Word Formation in Syntactic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchand, Hans.The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-Formation. (2nd edition). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitton, Roger.Computer-Usable Version of the Oxford Advanced Learners' Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford Text Archive, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, Jennifer.Strategic Competence in Second Language Performance: A Study of Four Advanced Learners. Trinity College: Centre for Language and Communication Studies, Occasional Paper No. 28, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, Graeme, Graham Russell, Alan Black and Stephen Pulman.Computational Morphology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scalise, Sergio. “Inflection and Derivation”.Linguistics, 26 (1988), 561–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleeman, D. and J. S. Brown, eds.Intelligent Tutoring Systems. New York: Academic Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, Andrew.Morphological Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sproat, Richard.Morphology and Computation. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wexler, Peter J.La formation du vocabulaire des chemins de fer en France (1778–1842). Genève: Droz, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Michael Levison is Professor and Head of the Department of Computing and Information Science at Queen's University at Kingston. His research interests currently centre on natural language generation and editing systems. He has written many articles on computer applications in literary and linguistic studies.

Greg Lessard is an Associate Professor in the Department of French Studies at Queen's University. A linguist, his research interests include computational modelling of natural language performance (including second language learner French and linguistic humour) and computer-aided textual analysis (including repeated string and complex textual structures.)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Levison, M., Lessard, G. New words from old: A formalism for word-formation. Comput Hum 29, 463–479 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01829877

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01829877

Key words

Navigation